Skip to main content
Log in

Genome fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping to differentiatePseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 strains

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The performance of ribotyping and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis was compared in the differentiation of a collection of 44Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 strains isolated in seven hospitals in Singapore. Digestion of genomic DNA byEcoRI andSacI followed by Southern hybridization with thePseudomonas aeruginosa 16S and 23S rRNA gene revealed seven distinct ribotypes. Ribotyping using a combination of both enzymes revealed 11 ribotypes. In contrast, electrophoretic analysis differentiated 41 different strain types among the 44 clinical isolates using eitherSpeI orDraI. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis demonstrated greater sensitivity than ribotyping in the differentiation ofPseudomonas aeruginosa strains of the same ribotype and could thus be used alone in epidemiological investigations of hospital outbreaks ofPseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bennett JV Nosocomial infections due toPseudomonas. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1974, 230, Supplement: 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bodey GP, Bolivar R, Feinstein V, Jadeja L Infections caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa. Reviews of Infectious Diseases 1983, 5: 279–293.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conroy JV, Baltch AL, Smith RP, Hammer MC, Griffin PE Bacteremia due toPseudomonas aeruginosa: use of a combined typing system in an eight-year study. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1983, 148: 603.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Farmer JJ, Weinstein RA, Zierdt CH, Brokopp CD Hospital outbreaks caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa: importance of serogroup O11. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1982, 16: 266–270.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Poh CL, Yap EH, Tay L, Bergan T Plasmid profiles compared with serotyping and pyocin typing for epidemiological surveillance ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Medical Microbiology 1988, 25: 109–114.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mayo MS, Cook WL, Schlitzer RL, Ward MA, Wilson LA, Aheran DG Antibiograms, serotypes and plasmid profiles ofPseudomonas aeruginosa associated with corneal ulcers and contact lens wear. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986, 24: 372–376.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alcock SR Acute otitis externa in divers working in the North Sea: a microbiological survey of seven saturation divers. Journal of Hygiene 1977, 78: 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shekar R, Rice TW, Zierdt CH, Kalick CA Outbreak of endocarditis caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 among pentazocine and tripennamine abusers in Chicago. Journal of Infectious Diseases 1985, 151: 203–208.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rajashekaraiah KR, Rice TW, Kallick CA Recovery ofPseudomonas aeruginosa from syringes of drug addicts with endocarditis. Journal of Infectious Disease 1981, 144: 482.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobson JA, Hoadley AW, Farmer JJ Pseudomonas aeruginosa serogroup O11 and pool-associated skin rash. American Journal of Public Health 1976, 66: 1092–1093.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, 1982, NY, p. 383–386.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schleifer KH, Ludwig W, Kraus J, Frestl H Cloned ribosomal ribonucleic acid genes fromPseudomonas aeruginosa as probes for conserved deoxyribonucleic acid sequences. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology 1985, 36: 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Suwanto A, Kaplan S Physical and genetic mapping of theRhodobacter sphaeroides 2.4.1 genome:genome size, fragment identification, and gene localization. Journal of Bacteriology 1989, 171: 5840–5849.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grotheus D, Koopmann U, von der Hardt H, Tümmler B Genome fingerprinting ofPseudomonas aeruginosa indicates colonization of cystis fibrosis siblings with closely related strains. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1988, 26: 1973–1977.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ojeniyi B, Hoiby N, Rosdahl VT Prevalence of persistence of polyagglutinablePseudomonas aeruginosa in isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. APMIS 1991, 99: 187–195.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sherertz RJ, Sarubbi FA A three-year study of nosocomial infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1983, 18: 160–164.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pitt TL, Livermore DM, Pitcher D, Vatopoulos AC, Legakis NJ Multiresistant serotype O12Pseudomonas aeruginosa: evidence for a common strain in Europe. Epidemiology and Infection 1989, 103: 565–576.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Visca P, Chiarini F, Vetriani C, Mansi A, Serino L, Orsi N Epidemiological typing of uropathogenicPseudomonas aeruginosa strains from hospitalized patients. Journal of Hospital Infection 1991, 19: 153–165.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Poh, C.L., Yeo, C.C. & Tay, L. Genome fingerprinting by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and ribotyping to differentiatePseudomonas aeruginosa serotype O11 strains. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 11, 817–822 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01960881

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01960881

Keywords

Navigation