Abstract
Quality control of routine drug assays, like most immunoassays, should mainly be the responsibility of each individual laboratory: intra-laboratory quality control. External quality assessment should direct its efforts in particular to non-routine methods and to new assays. However, it may sometimes also be very useful to have laboratory results of routine assays studied in external programmes, since vague requests or difficult interpretations of drug concentrations need discussion outside the individual laboratory.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pippenger CE, Penry JK, White BG, Daly DD, Buddington R. Interlaboratory variability in determination of plasma antiepileptic drug concentrations. Arch Neurol 1978;33:351–5.
Dijkhuis IC. Interlaboratorium onderzoek naar de bepaling van antiepileptica in plasma en serum met behulp van gelyofiliseerd standaard plasma [Interlaboratory study of the determination of antiepileptic drugs in plasma and serum using lyophylized standard plasma]. Pharm Weekbl 1975;110:1177–99.
Dijkhuis IC, De Jong HJ, Richens A, Pippenger CE, Leskinen EEA, Nyberg AWP. Joint international quality control program on the determination of antiepileptic drugs. Pharm Weekbl [Sci] 1979;1:151–84.
Kenney ML. Laboratory performance and regulatory requirements. Clin Chem 1987;33:1087–102.
Wilson JF, Williams J, Dijkhuis IC, et al. A survey of caffeine measurements in routine samples submitted for theophylline assay. Clin Chem 1985;31:1089.
Uges DRA. Referentiewaarden van klinisch-farmaceutische en toxicologische bepalingen. Resultaten van een enquête onder Nederlandse ziekenhuisapotheken [Serum reference values in therapeutic drug monitoring and clinical toxicology. Results of a questionnaire in Dutch hospital pharmacies]. Pharm Weekbl 1987;122:163–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dijkhuis, I.C. Quality control in therapeutic drug monitoring. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition 10, 138–144 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01959421
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01959421