Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 35–49 | Cite as

Quality of life in alternative residential settings

  • Anthony F. Lehman
  • Jean G. Slaughter
  • C. Patrick Myers
Articles

Abstract

Central to policy revisions over the past forty years toward persons with psychiatric disabilities has been a change in where they live. Whereas forty years ago those patients needing assistance were generally housed in large public mental hospitals, today a myriad of alternative community housing settings are offered. A major impetus for this shift in housing, at least as currently articulated in most public forums, has been to improve their quality of life. Here we examine the quality of life experiences of psychiatrically disabled persons living in alternative settings: a state hospital, large residential care facilities, small group homes, and supervised apartments. Our central hypothesis, only partly supported, is that a quality of life gradient exists across these living settings. The results lend support to the value of quality of life assessments and point to the importance of more focused notions about how our various interventions may affect the persons whom we serve.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Carling, PJ, & Ridgway, PA: Overview of a psychiatric rehabilitation approach to housing, in Psychiatric Rehabilitation: Turning Theory into Practice. Edited by Anthony, WA, Farkas, MA. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aiken, L, Somers, S, & Shore, M: Private foundations in health affairs: a case study of the development of a national initiative for the chronically mentally ill. American Psychologist 41: 1290–1295, 1987.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldman, HH, Lehman, AF, Morrissey, JP et al: Design for the National Evaluation of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Program on Chronic Mental Illness. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41:1217–1221, 1990.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braun, P, Kochansky, G, Shapiro, R, et al: Overview: Deinstitutionalization of psychiatric patients, a critical review of outcome studies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 138: 736–749, 1981.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Keisler, CA: Mental hospitals and alternative care: Noninstitutionalization as a potential public policy for mental patients, American Psychologist 37: 349–360, 1982.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Institute of Mental Health: National Plan of Research to Improve Care for Severe Mental Disorders. Draft 3/21/90.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lehman, AF, Ward, NC, & Linn, LS: Chronic mental patients: The quality of life issue. American Journal of Psychiatry 139: 1271–1276, 1982.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lehman, AF, Possidente, S, & Hawker, F: The quality of life of chronic patients in a state hospital and in community residences. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 37: 901–907, 1986.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lehman, AF, Slaughter, JG & Myers, CP: Quality of life experiences of the chronically mentally ill: gender and stages of life effects. In press.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lehman, AF: The effects of psychiatric symptoms on quality of life assessments among the chronic mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning 6: 143–151, 1983.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lehman, AF: A quality of life interview for the chronically mentally ill. Evaluation and Program Planning 11: 51–52, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Andrews, FM, & Withey, SB: Social Indicators of Well-Being: America's Perception of Life Quality, New York, Plenum Press, 1976.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Endicott, J, & Spitzer R: A diagnostic interview: the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35: 837–844, 1978.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ware, JE, Johnston, SA, Davies-Avery, A et al: Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the health insurance study, vol 3, Santa Monica, Rand Corporation, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allen, MJ & Yen, WM: Introduction to Measurement Theory, Belmont California, Wadsworth Inc.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Simpsom, CJ, Hyde, CE, & Faragher, EB: The chronically mentally ill in community facilities: a study of quality of life. British Journal of Psychiatry, 154: 77–82, 1989.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hargreaves, WA & Shumway, M: Effectiveness of services for the severely mentally ill, in The Future of Mental Health Services Research. Edited by Taube, CA, Mechanic, D, & Hohmann, AA. National Institute of Mental Health, DHHS Pub. No. (ADM)89-1600. Washington, D.C.: Supt. of Docs., U.S. Govt. Print. Office.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lehman, AF: Assessing Outcomes for the Severely Mentally Ill. Presented at the Association for Health Services Research Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C., 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Bureau of the Census. Current Housing Reports. Series H-150-(1989). General Housing Characteristics for the U.S. and regions: 1987. Annual Housing Survey: 1987. Washington, D.C., U.S. Govt. Print. Off.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lemke, S & Moos, RH: The suprapersonal environments of sheltered care settings. Journal of Gerontology 2: 233–243, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ridgway, P & Zipple, AM: The paradigm shift in residential services: from linear continuum to supported housing approaches. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 13: 11–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anthony F. Lehman
    • 1
  • Jean G. Slaughter
    • 1
  • C. Patrick Myers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of MarylandBaltimore

Personalised recommendations