Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 62, Issue 1, pp 9–18 | Cite as

A comprehensive alternative to residential treatment for adolescents and young adults

  • Barbara Lichner Ingram
  • Eli Katz
  • Ellen Katz
Articles

Abstract

This paper describes a treatment modality for adolescents and young adults who do not respond successfully to treatment within the family context. A comprehensive therapeutic program is implemented in the open community, providing benefits of residential care while avoiding many of the drawbacks. Five key components are discussed: creating individualized programs using community resources; effecting a complete separation from parents; maximizing autonomy and self-reliance; facilitating a corrective family experience; and capitalizing on transference in intensive individual psychotherapy, which is enhanced when a married couple functions as the treatment team. Suggestions for implementing this model are discussed and advantages and limitations are cited.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Farley JE: Preparing the family to make the decision about residential placement for an adolescent. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 36:662–664, 1985.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Feinstein SC, Uribe, V: Hospitalization of young people: rationale and criteria. Psychiatric Annals 15:602–605, 1985.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaufmann L: The rationale for the family approach with adolescents. Adolescent Psychiatry 13:493–509, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rossman PG, Freedman JA: Hospital treatment for disturbed adolescents: the role of parent counseling groups. Adolescent Psychiatry 10:391–406, 1982.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barker P: The Residential Psychiatric Treatment of Children. London, Crosby Lockwood Staples, 1974.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barker P: “The ‘impossible’ child”: some approaches to treatment. Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, (Spec Suppl) 23:SS-1–SS-21, 1978.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barker P: The future of residential treatment for children, in Children in Residential Care: Critical Issues in Treatment. Edited by Schaeffer CE, Swanson AJ. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bridgland M: Pioneer Work with Maladjusted Children. London, Crosby Lockwood Staples, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Noshpitz JD: Notes on the theory of residential treatment, in The Psychiatric Treatment of Adolescents. Edited by Esman AH. New York, International Universities Press, 1983.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rinsley DB: The Adolescent in residential treatment: some critical reflections. Adolescence 2:83–95, 1967.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rinsley DB: Theory and practice of intensive residential treatment of adolescents. Psychiatric Quarterly 42:611–638, 1968.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivlin LG, Wolfe M: Institutional Settings in Children's Lives. New York, John Wiley, 1985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schaefer CE, Swanson AJ: Children in Residential Care: Critical Issues in Treatment. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stone LA: Residential treatment, in Basic Handbook of Child Psychiatry, vol 3. Edited by Noshpitz JD. New York, Basic Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schneider S: A Model for an alternative educational treatment program for adolescents. Israel Annals of Psychiatry and Related Disciplines 16:1–20, 1978.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis WW: Ecological factors in successful residential treatment. Behavioral Disorders 7:149–156, 1982.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gwynn C, Meyer R, Schaefer C: The influence of the peer culture in residential treatment, in Children in Residential Care: Critical Issues in Treatment. Edited by Schaeffer CE, Swanson AJ. New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1988.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Adams DB: Adolescent residential treatment: An alternative to institutionalization. Adolescence 15:521–527, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Chedoke Child and Family Centre, Hamilton Ontario: Institutions without walls for emotionally disturbed children. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 28:849–851, 1977.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bachrach, LL, Talbott, JA, Meyerson, AT: The chronic psychiatric patient as a “difficult” patient: A conceptual analysis. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 33:35–50, 1987.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bassuk, E: Psychiatric emergency services: Can they cope as last-resort facilities? New Directions for Mental Health Services, 28:11–20, 1985.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baxter, E, Hopper, K: The new mendicancy: Homeless in New York City. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 53:393–408, 1982.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Frances, A, Goldfinger, SM: “Treating” a homeless mentally ill patient who cannot be managed in the shelter system. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 37:577–579, 1986.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Granet, RB, Talbott, JA: The continuity agent: Creating a new role to bridge the gaps in the mental health system. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 29:132–133, 1978.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lamb, HR, ed.: The Homeless Mentally Ill: A Task Force Report of the American Psychiatric Association. Washington, DC, American Psychiatric Association, 1984.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tessler, RC, Dennis, DL: A Synthesis of NIMH-funded Research Concerning Persons who are Homeless and Mentally Ill. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health, 1989.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Breton, M: A drop-in program for transient women: promoting competence through the environment. Social Work, 29:542–546, 1984.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Segal, SP, Baumohl, J: The community living room. Social Casework, 66:111–116, 1985.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Carling, PJ: Major mental illness, housing and supports: The promise of community integration. American Psychologist, 45: 969–975, 1990.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barbara Lichner Ingram
    • 1
  • Eli Katz
  • Ellen Katz
  1. 1.Pepperdine UniversityCulver City

Personalised recommendations