Advertisement

European Journal of Pediatrics

, Volume 155, Issue 7, pp 612–614 | Cite as

Chernobyl, low-dose radiation, and trisomy 21: Possibly something to worry about

  • K. E. von Mühlendahl
  • K. Muck
Environmental Aspects in Pediatrics

Keywords

Public Health 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Boice J, Linet M (1994) Chernobyl, childhood cancer, and chromosome 21. Probably nothing to worry about. BMJ 309: 139–140Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bound JP, Francis BJ, Harvey PW (1995) Down's syndrome: prevalence and ionising radiation in an area of North West England 1957–91. J Epidemiol Commun Health 49: 164–170Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Czeizel AE, Elek C, Gundy S, Metneki J, Nemes E, Reis A, Sperling K, Timar L, Tusnady G, Viragh Z (1993) Environmental trichlorofon and cluster of congenital abnormalities. Lancet 341:539–542Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    EUROCAT Working Group (1988) Prehminary evaluation of the impact of the Chernobyl radiological contamination on the freqency of central nervous system malformations in 18 regions of Europe. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2: 253–264Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harjulchto-Mervaala T, Salonen R, Aro T, Saxen L (1992) The accident at Chernobyl and trisomy 21 in Finland. Mutat Res 275: 81–86Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Introductory note (1994) Chernobyl and the “downwinders”. BMJ 309: 138Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kochupillai N, Verma IC, Grewal MS, Ramalingaswami V (1976) Down's syndrome and related abnormalities in an area of high background radiation in coastal Kerala. Nature 262: 60–61Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mühlendahl KE von (1995). The domestic use of pesticides and childhood cancer; thoughts on the importance of the abstracts in environmental publications. Eur J Pediatr 154: 991–992Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramsay CN, Ellis PM, Zealley H (1991) Down's syndrome in the Lothian region of Scotland-1978 to 1989. Biomed Pharmacother 45: 267–272Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sperling K, Pelz J, Wegner RD, Schulzke I, Struck R (1991) Frequency of trisomy 21 in Germany before and after the Chernobyl accident. Biomed Pharmacother 45: 255–262Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sperling K, Pelz, J, Wegner RD, Dörries A, Grüters A, Mikkelsen M (1994) Significant increase in trisomy 21 in Berlin nine months after the Chernobyl reactor accident: temporal correlation or causal relation? BMJ 309: 158–162Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sperling, K, Pelz J, Wegner RD, Dörrie A, Grüters A, Mikkelsen M (1994) Fallout from Chernobyl increased trisomy 21 in Berlin. BMJ 309: 1200Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sperling K, Pelz J, Wegner RD, Dörrie A, Grüters A, Mikkelsen M (1994) Bewertung eines Trisomie 21 Clusters. Med Genet 6: 378–385Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wals P de, Bertrand F, Mata I de la, Lechat MF (1988) Acta Paediatr Lat 42 [Suppl 3]: 846–854Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. E. von Mühlendahl
    • 1
  • K. Muck
    • 2
  1. 1.Doktimentations- und Informationszentrum für UmweltfragenAkademie für Kinderheilkunde und Jugendmedizin, KinderhospitalOsnabrückGermany
  2. 2.Kinderhospital OsnabrückOsnabrückGermany

Personalised recommendations