Advertisement

Neophilologus

, Volume 67, Issue 1, pp 15–20 | Cite as

Wittgénstein, rules, and literary language

  • Charles Eric Reeves
Article

Keywords

Comparative Literature Historical Linguistic Literary Language 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Ludwig Wittgenstein,Philosophical Investigations, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe (New York: Macmillan, 1968). Citations will be included in the text; numbers refer to sections in Part I.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    On the Margins of Discourse: The Relation of Literature to Language (Chicago: U of Chigago Press, 1978), p. 31.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zettel, trans. and ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright (Berkeley: U of California Press, 1970), p. 28e.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    “Art as a Semiotic Fact,” inStructure, Sign, and Function, ed. and trans. John Burbank and Peter Steiner (New Haven: Yale U Press, 1978), p. 84.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    “Art as Technique,” inRussian Formalist Criticism, trans. and ed. Lee T. Lemon and Marion J. Reis (Lincoln: U of Nebraska Press, 1965), p. 18.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    On Certainty, ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and G. H. von Wright, trans. D. Paul and G. E. M. Anscombe (Oxford: Blackwell, 1969), p. 63.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morse Peckham argues this point at length inMan's Rage for Chaos (New York: Schocken, 1967), pp. 69–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Wolters-Noordhoff 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Charles Eric Reeves
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of EnglishSmith CollegeNorthamptonUSA

Personalised recommendations