Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hamlet's testimony on Kiparsky's theory of meter

  • Published:
Neophilologus Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. George Gascoigne. “Certain notes of Instruction” (1575), inEnglish Reprints 10–12, ed. Edward Arber (London: 1868), 37.

  2. Morris Halle and Samuel Jay Keyser, “Iambic Pentameter,” inEnglish Stress: Its Form, Its Growth, and Its Role in Verse (New York: Harper and Row, 1971), pp. 164–80.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Paul Kiparsky, “Stress, Syntax, and Meter,”Language 51 (1975), 576–615, and “The Rhythmic Structure of English Verse,”Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1977), 189– 247.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gilbert Youmans, “Test Case for a Metrical Theory: ‘La Belle Dame sans Merci’, ”Language and Style 7 (1974), 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mervin Barnes and Helmut Esau, “English Prosody Reconsidered,”Language and Style 11 (1978), 212–22.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Barnes and Esau, “English Prosody Reconsidered.”

  7. Clayton Koelb, “The lambic Pentameter Revisited,”Neophilologus 63 (1979), 321–29.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Koelb, 321.

  9. Koelb, 328–29.

  10. Koelb, 326.

  11. Koelb, 327.

  12. Koelb, 328.

  13. Gascoigne, “Certain notes of Instruction,” p. 37.

  14. Sir Philip Sidney,The Defence of Poesie, inThe Prose Works, III, ed. Albert Feuillerat (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1962), p. 44.

    Google Scholar 

  15. George L. Dillon, “Kames and Kiparsky on Syntactic Boundaries,”Language and Style 10 (1977), 16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gascoigne, pp. 33–34.

  17. Gascoigne, p. 35.

  18. George Puttenham,The Arte of English Poesie (c. 1585), ed. Gladys Doidge Willcock and Alice Walker (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1970), p. 129.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Puttenham, p. 132.

  20. Puttenham, pp. 133–34.

  21. Donald C. Freeman, “On the Primes of Metrical Style,”Language and Style 1 (1968), 63–101. Rpt. inLinguistics and Literary Style, ed. Freeman (New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1970), P. 466.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neil Rudenstine,Sidney's Poetic Development (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press, 1967), pp. 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kiparsky (1975), p. 600.

  24. Kiparsky (1975), p. 580.

  25. Mark Liberman, “The Intonational System of English,” Diss. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT, 1975. Also, Mark Liberman and Alan Prince, “On Stress and Linguistic Rhythm,”Linguistic Inquiry 8 (1977), 249–336.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kiparsky (1977), 207.

  27. Halle and Keyser,English Stress, p. 169.

  28. Puttenham,The Arte of English Poesie, p. 131.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of English, 231 A & S Univ. of Missouri, 65211, Columbia, USA

    Gilbert Youmans

Authors
  1. Gilbert Youmans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Youmans, G. Hamlet's testimony on Kiparsky's theory of meter. Neophilologus 66, 490–503 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01956495

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01956495

Keywords

Search

Navigation