Skip to main content
Log in

Morphological variability and concealed deleterious effects inDrosophila melanogaster populations

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of brother-sister mating on viability of offspring were analyzed in relation to morphological variation of the individuals constituting the sib pairs.Drosophila melanogaster populations can be subdivided into 2 distinct groups of individuals that differ in the level of morphological variation and in their response to inbreeding. Genomes free of major deleterious factors appear to be favored by natural selection. A reduction in effective population size due to an environmental shift with consequent selection is thus not expected to be followed by inbreeding depression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Lewontin, R. C., The genetic basis of evolutionary changes. Columbia University Press, New York/London 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kidwell, M. G., Kidwell, J. F., and Nei, M., Genetics75, (1973) 133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bregliano, J. C., Picard, G., Bucheton, A., Pelisson, A., Lavige, J. M., and L'Heritier, P., Science207 (1980) 606.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Biémont, C., Mech. Ageing Dev.8 (1978) 21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Biémont, C., Doctoral thesis No. 7920. University of Lyon, Lyon 1979.

  6. Scheffe, H., The analysis of variance. John Wiley, New York 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Robertson, F. W., and Reeve, E. C. R., Nature170 (1952) 286.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe, T. K., Yamaguchi, O., and Mukai, T., Genetics82 (1976) 63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zouros, E., Singh, S. M., and Miles, H. E., Evolution34 (1980) 856.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mitton, J. B., Nature273 (1978) 661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Eanes, W. F., Nature276 (1978) 263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewontin, R. C., Am. Nat.90 (1956) 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Soulé, M., Evolution33 (1979) 396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lerner, I. M., Genetic homeostasis, John Wiley, New York 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thoday, J. M., Symp. Soc. exp. Biol.7 (1953) 96.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Valen, L., Evolution16 (1962) 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wright, S., Evolution and the genetics of populations, vol. 3. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago/London 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sved, J. A., and Ayala, F. J., Genetics66 (1970) 97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Noordwijk, A. J., and Scharloo, W., Evolution35 (1981) 674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We thank R.C. Lewontin in whose laboratory the American populations were studied, M.G. Kidwell for providing some isofemale lines and J. David, R. Grantham and especially R.C. Lewontin for their comments on the manuscript. Support was provided by a NATO grant for C.B. and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (associated laboratory No. 243).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Biémont, C., Bouclier, F. Morphological variability and concealed deleterious effects inDrosophila melanogaster populations. Experientia 39, 313–315 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955323

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01955323

Keywords

Navigation