Summary
Both fluid secretion and transepithelial potential were stimulated by cAMP. Fluid secretion was unaffected by 5-HT over the concentration range 10−8–10−4 M. The presence of ouabain in the bathing medium effected a decrease in transepithelial potential.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
J.A. Ramsay, J. exp. Biol.30, 358 (1953).
S.H.P. Maddrell, Adv. Insect Physiol.8, 199 (1971).
S.H.P. Maddrell, D.E.M. Pilcher and B.O.C. Gardiner, J. exp. Biol.54, 779 (1971).
S.H.P. Maddrell and S. Klunsuwan, J. Insect Physiol.19, 1369 (1973).
J.H. Anstee and D.M. Bell, J. Insect Physiol.21, 1779 (1975).
J.H. Anstee, D.M. Bell and H. Fathpour, J. Insect Physiol.25, 373 (1979).
A.J. Peacock, K. Bowler and J.H. Anstee, Experientia28, 901 (1972).
A.J. Peacock, K. Bowler and J.H. Anstee, Insect Biochem.6, 281 (1976).
J.H. Anstee and D.M. Bell, Insect Biochem.8, 3 (1978).
S. Datta, Indian J. exp. Biol.9, 36 (1971).
A.M. O'Riordan, J. exp. Biol.51, 699 (1969).
H.B. Irvine and J.E. Phillips, J. Insect Physiol.17, 381 (1971).
R.D. Prusch, J. Insect Physiol.24, 81 (1978).
M.J. Berridge and W.R. Schlue, J. exp. Biol.72, 203 (1978).
J.H. Anstee and K. Bowler, Comp. Biochem. Physiol.62A, 763 (1979).
D.E.M. Pilcher, J. exp. Biol.53, 465 (1970).
M.J. Berridge, J. exp. Biol.53, 171 (1970).
W.F. Henion, E.W. Sutherland and T.H. Posternak, Biochim. biophys. Acta148, 106 (1967).
M.J. Berridge and W.T. Prince, J. exp. Biol.56, 139 (1972).
M.J. Berridge and W.T. Prince, Adv. cyclic Nucleotide Res.1, 137 (1972).
W. Mordue, Gen. Comp. Endocr.3, 289 (1972).
R.J. Aston, J. Insect Physiol.21, 1873 (1975).
P.A. Farquharson, J. exp. Biol.60, 13 (1974).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anstee, J.H., Bell, D.M. & Hyde, D. Some factors affecting Malpighian tubule fluid secretion and transepithelial potential inLocusta migratoria L.. Experientia 36, 198–199 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953730
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01953730