Experientia

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 352–363 | Cite as

Olfactory navigation in birds

Multi-Author Review

Summary

Many bird species rely on an osmotactic mechanism to find food sources even at a considerable distance. Pigeons also rely on local odours for homeward orientation, and they integrate those perceived during passive transportation with those at the release site. It is possible to design experiments in which birds are given false olfactory information, and predictions about the effects of this can be made and tested. Pigeons build up their olfactory map by associating wind-borne odours with the directions from which they come; this was shown by experiments which aimed at preventing, limiting or altering this association. Some objections have been made to this conclusion; namely that even anosmic pigeons are sometimes homeward oriented, that they may be demotivated in flying or disturbed in their general behaviour, and that olfactory cues may be only one component of pigeo's navigational repertoire. The most recent experiments, however, confirm that pigeons derive directional information from atmospheric odouts. The lack of any knowledge about the chemical nature and distribution of the odorants which allow pigeons to navigate hinders progress in this area of research.

Key words

Bird olfaction orientation navigation homing pigeon 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Able, K. P., Mechanisms of orientation, navigation and homing, in: Animal Migration, Orientation and Navigation, pp. 283–373. Ed. S. A. Gautreaux Jr. Academic Press, New York 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Adrian, E. D., Olfactory discrimination. Année psychol.50 (1975) 107–113.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alleva, E., Baldaccini, N. E., Foà, A., and Visalberghi, E., Homing behaviour of the rock pigeon. Monitore zool ital. (N.S.)9 (1975) 213–224.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Baker, R. R., The Evolutionary Ecology of Animal Migration. Hadder and Stanghton, London 1978.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baldaccini, N. E., Benvenuti, S., Fiaschi, V., Ioalè, P., and Papi, F., Investigation of pigeon homing by means of “deflector cages”, in: Animal Migration, Navigation and Homing, pp. 78–91. Eds K. Schmidt-Koenig and W. T. Keeton, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1978.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baldaccini, N. E., Benvenuti, S., Fiaschi, V., Ioalè, P., and Papi, F., Pigeon orientation: experiments on the role of olfactory stimuli perceived during the outward journey, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 160–169. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baldaccini, N. E., Benvenuti, S., Fiaschi, V., and Papi, F., Pigeon navigation: effects of wind deflection at home cage on homing behaviour. J. comp. Physiol.99 (1975) 177–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Balthazart, J., and Schoffeniels, E., Pheromones are involved in the control of sexual behavior in birds. Naturwissenschaften66 (1979) 55–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bang, B. G., Functional anatomy of the olfactory system in 23 orders of birds. Acta anat. suppl.58 (1971) 1–76.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bang, B. G., and Wenzel, B. M., Nasal cavity and olfactory system, in: Form and Function in Birds, vol. 3, pp. 195–225. Eds A. S. King and J. McLelland. Academic Press, New York 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Becker, J., and van Raden, H., Meteorologische Gesichtspunkte zur olfactorischen Navigationhypothese. J Orn.127 (1986) 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Benvenuti, S., and Brown, I. A., The influence of olfactory deprivation on experienced and inexperienced American pigeons. Behaviour, in press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Benvenuti, S., Fiaschi, V., Fiore, L., and Papi, F., Homing performances of inexperienced and directionally trained pigeons subjected to olfactory nerve section. J. comp. Physiol83 (1973) 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bevenuti, S., Fiaschi, V., Foà, A., Ioalè, P., and Pani, F., The acquisition of the olfactory map in homing pigeons, in: RIN 1989, Orientation and Navigation — Birds, Humans, and other Animals, paper No. 17. The Royal Institute of Navigation, London 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Benvenuti, S., and Wallraff, H. G., Pigeon navigation: site simulation by means of atmospheric odours. J. comp. Physiol. A.156 (1985) 737–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bingman, V. P., and Ioalè, P., Initial orientation of anosmic homing pigeons based on information gathered at familiar release sites remains homeward directed following clock-shift. Behaviour110 (1989) 205–218.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bingman, V. P., Ioalè, P., Casini, G., and Bagnoli, P., Pigeon homing and the avian hippocampal complex: a complementary spatial behavior paradigm. in: Cognitive Processes and Spatial Behavior in Animal and Man, pp. 273–283. Eds P. Ellen and C. Thinus-Blanc. Nijhof Press, The Nethetlands 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark, L., and Mason, J. R., Use of the nest material as insecticidal and anti-pathogenic agents by the European starling. Oecologia67 (1985) 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark, L., and Mason, J. R., Olfactory discrimination of plant volatiles by the European starling. Anim. Behav.35 (1987) 227–235.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fiaschi, V., Baldaccini, N. E., Ioalè, P., and Papi, F., Helicopter observations of homing pigeons with biased orientation because of deflected winds at the home loft. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)15 (1981) 139–153.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fiaschi, V., Farina, A., and Ioalè, P., Homing experiments on SwiftsApus apus (L.) deprived of olfactory perception. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)8 (1974) 235–244.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fink, V., Geruchsorgan und Riechvermögen bei Vögeln. Zool. Jb., allg. Zool. Physiol.71 (1965) 429–450.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foà, A., and Albonetti, E., Does familiarity with the release site influence the initial orientation of homing pigeons? Experiments with clock-shifted birds. Z. Tierpsychol.54 (1980) 327–338.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Foà, A., Bagnoli, P., and Giongo, F., Homing pigeons subjected to section of the anterior commissure can build up two olfactory maps in the deflector lofts. J. comp. Physiol.159 (1986) 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Foà, A., Benvenuti, S., Ioalè, P., and Wallraff, H. G., Geographical and temporal variability in pigeon homing. Parallel studies in Italy and Germany. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.15 (1984) 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Foà, A., Wallraff, H. G., Ioalè, P., and Benvenuti, S., Comparative investigations of pigeon homing in Germany and in Italy, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 232–238. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fuller, E., Kowalski, U., and Wiltschko, R., Orientation of homing pigeons: compass orientation vs piloting by familiar landmarks. J. comp. Physiol.153 (1983) 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Goldsmith, K. M., and Goldsmith, T. H., Sense of smell in the Black-chinned Hummingbird. Condor84 (1982) 237–238.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Graue, L. C., The effect of phase shifts in the day-night cycle on pigeon homing at distance of less than one mile. Ohio J. Sci.63 (1963) 214–217.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Grubb, T. C. Jr, Smell and foraging in Shearwaters and Petrels. Nature237 (1972) 404–405.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Grubb, T. C. Jr, Olfactory navigation to the nesting burrow in Leach's Petrel (Oceanodroma leucorrhoa). Anim. Behav.22 (1974) 192–202.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Haase, E., Otto, C., and Murbach, H., Brain weight in homing and ‘non-homing’ pigeons. Experientia33 (1977) 606–607.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hartwick, R. F., Foà, A., and Papi, F., The effect of olfactory deprivation by nasal tubes upon homing behaviour in pigeons. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.2 (1977) 81–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Henton, W. W., Smith, J. C., and Tucker, D., Odor discrimination in pigeons. Science153 (1966) 1138–1139.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hermayer, K. L., and Keeton, W. T., Homing behavior of pigeons subjected to bilateral olfactory nerve section. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)13 (1979) 303–313.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hutchinson, L. V., and Wenzel, B. M., Olfactory guidance in foraging by Procellariformes. Condor82 (1980) 314–319.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hutchinson, L. V., Wenzel, B. M., Stager, K. E., and Telford, B. L., Further evidence for olfactory foraging by Sooty Shearwaters and Northern Fulmars, in: Marine Birds: their Feeding Ecology and Commercial Fisheries Relationship, pp. 72–76. Eds D. W. Nettleship, G. A. Sanger and P. F. Springer. Spec. Publ. Canada Wildlife Service, 1984.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ioalè, P., Further investigations on the homing behaviour of pigeon subjected to reverse wind direction at the loft. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)14 (1980) 77–87.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ioalè, P., Pigeon homing: effects of differential shielding of home cages, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 170–178. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ioalè, P., and Benvenuti, S., Pigeon homing: further experiments on shielded lofts. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.76A (1983) 725–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ioalè, P., and Papi, F., Olfactory bulb size, odor discrimination and magnetic insensitivity in hummingbirds. Physiol. Behav.45 (1989) 995–999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ioalè, P., Papi, F., Fiaschi, V., and Baldaccini, N. E., Pigeon navigation: effects upon homing behaviour by reversing wind direction at the loft. J. comp. Physiol.128 (1978) 285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ioalè, P., Wallraff, H. G., Papi, F., and Foà, A., Long-distance releases to determine the spatial range of pigeon navigation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.76A (1983) 733–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Isack, H. A., and Reyer, H.-U., Honeyguides and honey gatherers: interspecific communication in a symbiotic relationship. Science243 (1989) 1343–1346.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jacob, J., Balthazart, J., and Schoffeniels, E., Sex differences in the chemical composition of uropygial gland waxes in domestic ducks. Biochem. Syst. Ecol.7 (1979) 149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jarvi, T., and Wiklund, C., A note on the use of olfactory cues by a great titParus major in food choice. Fauna Norv. SerC7 (1984) 139.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Jouventin, P., and Robin, P., Olfactory experiments on some antarctic birds. Emu 84 (1984) 46–48.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Keeton, W. T., Orientation by pigeons: is the sun necessary? Science165 (1969) 922–928.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keeton, W. T., Magnets interfere with pigeon homing. Proc. natl Acad. Sci.68 (1971) 102–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Keeton, W. T., Avian orientation and navigation: new developments in an old mistery, in: Acta XVII Congr. int. Ornith. 1978, pp. 137–157. Ed. E. Nohring, Dt. Ornithol. Ges., Berlin 1980.Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Keeton, W. T., Kreithen, M. L., and Hermayer, K. L., Orientation by pigeons deprived of olfaction by nasal tubes. J. comp. Physiol.114 (1977) 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Kennedy, R. J., Preen gland weights. Ibis113 (1971) 369–372.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Pigeon homing: a repetition of the deflector loft experiment. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.3 (1978) 393–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Pigeon homing: deprivation of olfactory information does not affect the deflector effect. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.6 (1979) 11–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Pigeon orientation: a preliminary evaluation of factors involved or not involved in the deflector loft effect, in. Avian Navigation, pp. 203–210. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Can pigeons be fooled about the actual release site position by presenting them information from another site? Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.18 (1985) 75–82.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Are site-specific airborne stimuli relevant for pigeon navigation only when matched by other release-site information? Naturwissenschaften73 (1986) 42–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kiepenheuer, J., Baldaccini, N. E., and Alleva, E., A comparison of orientational and homing performances of homing pigeons of Germany and Italy. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)13 (1979) 159–171.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kramer, G., Wird die Sonnenhöhe bei der Heimfindeorientierung verwertet?. J. Orn.94 (1953) 201–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kramer, G., Ueber die Heimfindeleistung unter Sichtbegrenzung aufgewachsener Brieftauben. Verh. dt. zool. Ges.52 (1959) 168–176.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kramer, G., Recent experiments on bird orientation. Ibis101 (1959) 399–416.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Macadar, A. W., Rausch, L. J., Wenzel, B. M., and Hutchinson, L. V., Electrophysiology of the olfactory pathway in the pigeon. J. comp. Physiol.137 (1980) 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Matthews, G. V. T., Bird Navigation, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, London 1968.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Merkel, F. W., Orientierung im Tierreich. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart 1980.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mueller, H., Drenckhahn, D., and Haase, E., Vergleichend quantitative und ultrastrukturelle Untersuchungen am Geruchsorgan von vier Haustaubenrassen. Z. mikrosk.-anat. Forsch.93(1979) 888–900.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Northcutt, R. G., Evolution of the telencephalon in nonmammals. A. Rev. Neurosci.4 (1981) 301–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Papi, F., The olfactory navigation system of the homing pigeon. Verh. dt zool. Ges.69 (1976) 184–205.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Papi, F., Olfaction and homing in pigeons: ten years of experiments, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 149–159. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Papi, F., Pigeon navigation: solved problems and open questions. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)20 (1986) 471–517.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Papi, F., Fiaschi, V., Benvenuti, S., and Baldaccini, N. E., Pigeon homing: outward journey detours influence the initial orientation. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)7 (1973) 129–133.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Papi, F., Fiore, L., Fiaschi, V., and Benvenuti, S., The influence of olfactory nerve section on the homing capacity of carrier pigeons. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)5 (1971) 265–267.Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Papi, F., Fiore, L., Fiaschi, V., and Benvenuti, S., Olfaction and homing in pigeons. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)6 (1972) 85–95.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Papi, F., Fiore, L., Fiaschi, V., and Benvenuti, S., An experiment for testing the hypothesis of olfactory navigation of homing pigeons. J. comp. Physiol.83 (1973) 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Papi, F., Gagliardo, A., Fiaschi, V., and Dall'Antonia, P., Pigeon homing: does early experience determine what cues are used to navigate? Ethology,82 (1989) 208–215.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Papi, F., Ioalè, P., Fiaschi, V., Benvenuti, S., and Baldaccini, N. E., Olfactory navigation of pigeons: the effect of treatment with odorous air currents. J. comp. Physiol.94 (1974) 187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Papi, F., Ioalè, P., Fiaschi, V., Benvenuti, S., and Baldaccini, N. E., Pigeon homing: cues detected during the outward journey influence initial orientation, in: Animal Migration, Navigation and Homing, pp. 65–77. Eds K. Schmidt-Koenig and W. T. Keeton. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1978.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Papi, F., Ioalè, P., Fiaschi, V., Benvenuti, S., and Baldaccini, N. E., Pigeon homing: the effect of outward-journey detours on orientation. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)18 (1984) 53–87.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Papi, F., Keeton, W. T., Brown, A. I., and Benvenuti, S., Do American and Italian pigeons rely on different homing mechanism?. J. comp. Physiol.128 (1978) 303–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Phillips, J. B., and Waldvogel, J. A., Reflected light cues generate the short-term deflector-loft effect, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 190–202. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Reiner, A., and Karten, H. J., Comparison of olfactory bulb projections in pigeons and turtles. Brain Behav. Evol.27 (1985) 11–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Schmidt-Koenig, K., Experimentelle Einflussnahme auf die 24-Stunden-Periodik bei Brieftauben und deren Auswirkungen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Heimfindevermögens. Z. Tierpsychol.15 (1958) 301–331.Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Schmidt-Koenig, K., Die Sonne als Kompass im Heim-Orientierungssystem der Brieftauben. Z. Tierpsychol.18 (1961) 211–244.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Schmidt-Koenig, K., Bird navigation: has olfactory orientation solved the problem? Quart. Rev. Biol.62 (1987) 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Shallenberger, R. J., Olfactory use in the Wedge-tailed Shearwater (Puffinus pacificus) on Manana Island, Haway, in: Olfaction and Taste V, pp. 355–360. Eds D. A. Denton and J. P. Coghlan. Academic Press, New York 1975.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Shibuya, T., and Tucker, D., Single unit responses of olfactory receptors in Vultures, in: Olfaction and Taste II, pp. 219–233. Ed. T. Hayashi. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1967.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Shumake, S. A., Smith, J. C., and Tucker, D., Olfactory intensity-difference thresholds in the pigeon. J. comp. Physiol. Psychol.67 (1969) 64–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Smith, J. C., Conditioned suppression as an animal psychophysical technique, in: Animal Psychophysics, pp. 125–159. Ed. W. C. Stebbins. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York 1970.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Smith, S. A., and Paselk, R. A., Olfactory sensitivity of the Turkey Vulture (Cathartes aura) to three carrion-associated odorants. Auk103 (1986) 586–592.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Snyder, G. K., and Peterson, T. T., Olfactory sensitivity in the blackbilled magpie and in the pigeon. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.62 (1979) 921–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Stager, K. E., Avian olfaction. Am. Zool.7 (1967) 415–420.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Stattelman, A. J., Talbot, R. B., and Coulter, D. B., Olfactory thresholds of pigeons (Columba livia), quail (Coturnix virginianus) and chickens (Gallus gallus). Comp. Biochem. Physiol.50A (1975) 807–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Staubli, V., Schottler, F., and Nejat-Bina, D., Role of dorsomedial thalamic nucleus and piriform cortex in processing olfactory information. Behav. Brain Res.25 (1987) 117–129.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Tucker, D., Electrophysiological evidence for olfactory function in brids. Nature207 (1965) 34–36.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Waldvogel, J. A., Olfactory navigation in homing pigeons: are the current models atmospherically realistic? Auk104 (1987) 369–379.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Waldvogel, J. A., Olfactory orientation by birds, in: Current Ornithology, vol. 6, pp. 269–321. Ed. D. M. Power. Plenum Press, New York 1989.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Waldvogel, J. A., Benvenuti, S., Keeton, W. T., and Papi, F., Homing pigeon orientation influenced by deflected winds at home loft. J. comp. Physiol.128 (1978) 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Waldvogel, J. A., and Phillips, J. B., Pigeon homing: new experiments involving permanent-resident deflector-loft birds, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 179–189. eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Walker, J. C., Walker, D. B., Tambiah, C. R., and Gilmore, K. S., Olfactory and non-olfactory odor detection in pigeons: elucidation by a cardiac accelerator paradigm. Physiol. Behav.38 (1986) 575–580.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Wallraff, H. G., Über die Heimfindeleistungen von Brieftauben nach Haltung in verschiedenartig abgeschirmten Volieren. Z. vergl. Physiol.52 (1966) 215–259.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wallraff, H. G., Weitere Volierenversuche mit Brieftauben: wahrscheinlicher Einfluss dynamischer Faktoren der Atmosphäre auf die Orientierung. Z. vergl. Physiol.68 (1970) 182–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Wallraff, H. G., Goal-oriented and compass-oriented movements of displaced homing pigeons after confinement in differentially shielded aviaries. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.5 (1979) 201–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wallraff, H. G., Does pigeon homing depend on stimuli perceived during displacement? I. Experiments in Germany. J. comp. Physiol.139 (1980) 193–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Wallraff, H. G., Olfaction and homing in pigeons: nerve-section experiments, critique hypotheses. J. comp. Physiol.139 (1980) 209–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Wallraff, H. G., The olfactory component of pigeon navigation: steps of analysis. J. comp. Physiol.143 (1981) 411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Wallraff, H. G., Relevance of atmospheric odours and geomagnetic field to pigeon navigation: what is the ‘map basis’?. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.76 A (1983) 643–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Wallraff, H. G., Directional components derived from initial-orientation data of inexperienced homing pigeons. J. comp. Physiol.159 (1986) 143–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Wallraff, H. G., Relevance of olfaction and atmospheric odours to pigeon homing, in: Orientation in Space, pp. 71–80. Ed. G. Beugnon. Privat, IEC, Toulouse 1986.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Wallraff, H. G., Navigation mit Duftkarte und Sonnenkompass: das Heimfindevermögen der Brieftauben. Naturwissenschaften75 (1988) 380–392.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Wallraff, H. G., The whereabouts of non-homing homing pigeons: recoveries of normal and anosmic birds. in: RIN ‘89’. Orientation and Navigation—Birds, Humans, and other Animals, paper No. 10. Royal Institute of Navigation, London 1989.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Wallraff, H. G., Olfactory deprivation in pigeons: examination of methods applied in homing experiments. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.89 A (1989) 621–629.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Wallraff, H. G., Conceptual approaches to avian navigation systems. Experientia46 (1990) 379–388.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wallraff, H. G., Benvenuti, S., and Foà, A., Pigeon navigation: time course of olfactory signal processing and dependence on access to fresh environmental air. J. comp. Physiol.A 155 (1984) 139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Wallraff, H. G., Benvenuti, S., and Foà, A., Attempts to reveal the nature of apparent residual of homeward orientation in anosmic pigeons: application of magnetic fields. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)20 (1986) 401–423.Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Wallraff, H. G., and Foà, A., Pigeon navigation: charcoal filter removes relevant information from environmental air. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.9 (1981) 67–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wallraff, H. G., Foà, A., and Ioalè, P., Does pigeon homing depend on stimuli perceived during displacement? II. Experiments in Italy. J. comp. Physiol.139 (1980) 203–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Wallraff, H. G., and Hund, K., Homing experiments with starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) subjected to olfactory nerve section. in: Avian Navigation, pp. 313–318. Eds F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Wallraff, H. G., and Neumann, M. F., Contribution of olfactory navigation and non-olfactory pilotage to pigeon homing. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.25 (1989) 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Wallraff, H. G., Papi, F., Ioalè, P., and Foà, A., On the spatial range of pigeon navigation. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)15 (1981) 155–161.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Wallraff, H. G., and Sinsch, U., The role of ‘outward-journey information’ in homing experiments with pigeons: new data on ontogeny of navigation and general survey. Ethology77 (1988) 10–27.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Walter, W. G., Some experiments on the sense of smell in birds. Archs néerl. Physiol.27 (1943) 1–72.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Wenzel, B. M., Olfactory perception in birds, in: Olfaction and Taste II, pp. 203–217. Ed. T. Hayashi. Pergamon Press, Oxford 1967.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Wenzel, B. M., Olfaction in birds, in: Handbook of Sensory Physiology, pp. 432–448. Ed. L. M. Beidler, Springer Verlag, Berlin 1971.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Wenzel, B. M., Functional status and credibility of avian olfaction, in: Avian Navigation, pp. 352–361. Eds. F. Papi and H. G. Wallraff. Springer Verlag, Berlin 1982.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Wenzel, B. M., Albritton, P. F., Salzman, A., and Oberjat, T. E., Behavioural changes in pigeons after olfactory nerve section or bulb ablation, in: Olfaction and Taste III, pp. 278–287. Ed. C. Pfaffman. Rockefeller University Press, New York 1969.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Wenzel, B. M., and Rausch, L. J., Does the olfactory system modulate affective behavior in the pigeon? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.290 (1977) 314–330.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Wenzel, B. M., and Salzman, A., Olfactory bulb ablation or nerve section and pigeons' behavior in non-olfactory learning. Exp. Neurol.22 (1968) 472–479.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Wenzel, B. M., and Siek, M. K., Olfactory perception and bulbar electrical activity in several avian species. Physiol. Behav.9 (1972) 287–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Wiltschko, R., and Wiltschko, W., Pigeon homing: does initial orientation include a ‘preferred compass direction’? J. comp. Physiol. A157 (1985) 469–476.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Wiltschko, R., and Wiltschko, W., Pigeon homing: can release site biases be explained by ‘preferred compass direction’? Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)19 (1985) 197–206.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    Wiltschko, R., and Wiltschko, W., Pigeon homing: olfactory orientation—a paradox. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.24 (1989) 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Wiltschko, R., Wiltschko, W., Foà, A., and Benvenuti, S., Orientation behaviour of pigeons deprived of olfactory information during the outward journey and at the release site. Monitore zool. ital. (N.S.)20 (1986) 183–193.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Wiltschko, W., Wiltschko, R., Gruter, M., and Kowalsky, U., Pigeon homing: early experience determines what factors are used for navigation. Naturwissenschaften74 (1987) 196–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Wiltschko, W., Wiltschko, R., and Walcott, C., Pigeon homing: different effects of olfactory deprivation in different countries. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol.21 (1987) 333–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Wuerdinger, I., Olfaction and feeding behavior in juvenile geese (Anser a. anser andAnser domesticus). Z. Tierpsychol.49 (1979) 132–135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Birkhäuser Verlag 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Papi
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Scienze del Comportamento animale dell'Università di PisaPisa(Italy)
  2. 2.Centro di Studio per la Faunistica ed Ecologia Tropicali del C.N.R.Firenze(Italy)

Personalised recommendations