Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Belons „Phönix“ war kein Paradiesvogel

  • Kurze Mitteilungen
  • Published:
Journal für Ornithologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Belon, P. (1553). Les observations de plusieurs singularités et choses memorables, trouuées en Grece, Asie, Iudée ... Paris 1553 (p. 190 b).

  • Belon, P. (1555). L'histoire de la nature des oiseaux. Paris 1555 (p. 329–330).

  • Coomaraswamy, A. A. (1929). Les miniatures orientales de la collectionGoloubew. Bruxelles 1929 (Pl. LIV, LV; No. 97 a, 97 b).

  • Stresemann, E. (1914). Was wußten die Schriftsteller des 16. Jahrhunderts von den Paradiesvögeln? Novit. Zool. 21 (p. 14, 16, 17).

Download references

Authors
  1. E. Stresemann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stresemann, E. Belons „Phönix“ war kein Paradiesvogel. J. Ornithol 93, 361–362 (1952). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01950658

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01950658

Search

Navigation