Abstract
In the interpretation of patients with primary and secondary tumors of the liver, different radiologic procedures play an important role. We discuss ultrasound, computerized tomography, and angiography; the advantages and drawbacks of these modalities; and how they should be used when surgery or infusion chemotherapy is planned.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yeh HC, Rabinowitz JG: Ultrasonography and computed tomography of the liver.Radiol Clin North Am 18:321–338, 1980
Marchal GJ, Baert AL, Wilms GE: CT of noncystic liver lesions: bolus enhancement.AJR 135:57–65, 1980
Lamarque JL, Bruel JM, Roumanet JP, Triby X, Bengana A, Levy P: Malignant liver tumors. A comparison of ultrasonography, computed tomography and arteriography.Acta Gastroenterol Belg 43:260, 1980
Berland, LL, Lawson TL, Foley WD, Melrose BL, Chintapalli KN, Taylor AJ: Comparison of pre- and postcontrast CT in hepatic masses.AJR 138:853–858, 1982
Blumgart LH, Allison DJ: Resection and embolization in the management of secondary hepatic tumors.World J Surg 6:32, 1982
Lunderquist A: Arterial segmental supply of the liver. An angiographic study.Acta Radiol Suppl 272:1967
Boijsen E, Redman HC: Effect of bradykinin on celiac and superior mesenteric angiography.Invest Radiol 1:422–430, 1966
Redman HC, Reuter SR, Miller WJ: Improvement of superior mesenteric and portal vein visualization with tolazoline.Invest Radiol 4:24–27, 1969
Jonsson K, Wallace S, Jacobson ED, Anderson JH, Zornoza J, Granmayeh M: The use of prostaglandin E1 for enhanced visualization of the splanchnic circulation.Radiology 125:373–378, 1977
Freeny PC, Antonovic A, Guttierrez OH, Rösch J: Diagnostic effectiveness of infusion hepatic angiography. A comparison with the conventional technique.Fortschr Röntgenstr 124:534–541, 1976
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lunderquist, A., Owman, T. Preoperative diagnosis and evaluation of hepatic tumor resectability. Gastrointest Radiol 8, 227–230 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01948124
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01948124