Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Toward the design of intraregional infrastructure policy

  • Regional Analysis
  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bain, J. S. et al.Northern California's Water Industry. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartholomew, H.Land Uses in American Cities. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beckmann, M. et al.Studies in the Economics of Transportation. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boblett, R. P. “Factors in Industrial Location,”Appraisal Journal, Vol. 35 (1967), pp. 518–526.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Borchardt, K. “Die Bedeutung der Infrastruktur für sozialökonomische Entwicklung,” in H. Arndt and D. Swatek (Eds.),Grundfragen der Infrastrukturplanung für wachsende Wirtschaften. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, New Series, Vol. 58. Berlin: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boyce, D. E. et al.Metropolitan Plan Making. Monograph Series No. 4. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown and Caldwell, Consulting Engineers.City of Mountain View, Santa Clara County, California, A Report on Water Supply and Distribution. San Francisco, 1968.

  8. Buhr, W. “A Retrospective View of Criteria for Investment Planning in Developing Areas,” in R. Jochimsen and U. E. Simonis (Eds.),Theorie und Praxis der Infrastrukturpolitik. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, New Series, Vol. 54. Berlin: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  9. — “Die Abhängigkeit der räumlichen Entwicklung von der Infrastrukturausstattung,” in H. Arndt and D. Swatek (Eds.),Grundfragen der Infrastrukturplanung für wachsende Wirtschaften. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, New Series, Vol. 58, Berlin; Verlag von Duncker and Humblot, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  10. — “The Role of Material Infrastructure in Intraregional Development, Studies in Urban Infrastructure: The Case of Santa Clara County, California.” Unpublished manuscript, Institut für Regionalforschung der Universität Kiel, Kiel, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chinitz, B. Contribution at Panel Discussion on “Will Model Building and the Computer Solve our Economic Forecasting Problems?”Highway Research Record, No. 149 (1966), pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cottingham, P. H. “Decision Rules in a Public Bureaucracy: An Examination of Highway Planning.” Unpublished Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  13. County of Santa Clara.Transportation Planning Study. Environmental Attitudes Study: Summary of Findings. San Jose, California. 1967.

  14. County of Santa Clara.Interim Study Report: Governmental Influences on Growth. San Jose, California, 1967.

  15. County of Santa Clara Planning Department.Land Use Issues in Santa Clara County. San Jose, California, 1963.

  16. County of Santa Clara Planning Department.Commerical Land Needs, Part II, San Jose, California, 1964.

  17. County of Santa Clara Planning Department. Industrial Land Needs, Part II, San Jose, California, 1965.

  18. County of Santa Clara Planning Department.A Study of the Economy of Santa Clara County, California. San Jose, California, 1967.

  19. County of Santa Clara Planning Department.Directory of Industrial Parks and Industrial Districts in Santa Clara County. 1967. Info Commentary No. 5, San Jose, California, 1967.

  20. Downing, P. B.The Economics of Urban Sewage Disposal. New York: Frederick A. Praeger, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dubbink, D. T. “Estimating the Spatial Distribution of Industry within an Urban Region: The Santa Clara County Industrial Land Use Model,”Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 2 (1968), pp. 187–202.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dyckman, J. W. and R. R. Isaacs.Capital Requirements for Urban Development and Renewal. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frey, R. L.Infrastruktur, Grundlagen der Planung öffentlicher Investitionen. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Georgia Institute of Technology, Engineering Experiment Station. “Industrial Resources and Potentials of the Southeast River Basins.” Atlanta, 1960.

  25. Goldberg, M. “Intrametropolitan Industrial Location: Plant Size and the Theory of Production.” Technical Report No. 2, Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goldner, W. et al. “Economic and Spatial Impacts of Alternative Airport Sizes and Locations in the San Francisco Bay Region,” Vol. 1: Report, Institute of Transportation and Traffic Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harris, B. “Quantitative Models in Urban Development: Their Role in Metropolitan Policy-Making,” in H. S. Perloff and L. Wingo (Eds.),Issues in Urban Economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hirsch, W. Z. “The Supply of Urban Public Services,” in H. S. Perloff and L. Wingo (Eds.),Issues in Urban Economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hirschman, A. O.The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  30. International Housing Productivity Study Staff. “Housing in Regional Economic Development and Planning,”Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 3 (1969), pp. 100–110.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Isard, W.Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge, Mass.: The M.I.T. Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jochimsen, R.Theorie der Infrastruktur, Grundlagen der marktwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jorgenson, D. W. and S. S. Handel. “Investment Behavior in U.S. Regulated Industries,”The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2 (1971), pp. 213–264.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kain, J. F. “Urban Travel Behavior,” in L. F. Schnore and H. Fagin (Eds.),Urban Research and Policy Planning. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kinnard, W. N.Industrial Real Estate. Washington, D. C.: Society of Industrial Realtors of the National Association of Real Estate Boards, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Klaassen, L. H.Social Amenities in Area Economic Growth. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lessinger, J. “The Case for Scatteration: Some Reflections on the National Capital Region Plan for the Year 2000,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 28 (1962), pp. 159–169.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Little, A. D. Inc. “Potential Urban Growth: South Santa Clara County, Phase I Report: South Santa Clara County Sewage System Planning Study.” Summary report to Board of Supervisors, Santa Clara County, San Jose, California, June 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  39. — “Sewerage for Urban Growth: South Santa Clara County, Phase II: South Santa Clara County Sewage System Planning Study.” Summary report to Board of Supervisors, Santa Clara County, San Jose, California, November, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Loewenstein, L. K. “A Proposed Manufacturing Location Model,”Annals of Regional Science, Vol. 1 (1967), pp. 51–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Mace, R. L.Industry and City Government. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Institute of Government, University of North Carolina, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Margolis, J. “The Demand for Urban Public Services,” in H. S. Perloff and L. Wingo (Eds.),Issues in Urban Economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Siebert, H. “Zur Frage der Distributionswirkungen öffentlicher Infrastrukturinvestitionen,” in R. Jochimsen and U. E. Simonis (Eds.),Theorie und Praxis der Infrastrukturpolitik. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, New Series, Vol. 54. Berlin: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Spiegelman, R. G. “A Study of Industry Location Using Multiple Regression Techniques.” Agricultural Economic Report No. 40, Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, D. C., 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stanford Research Institute et al.Costs of Urban Infrastructure for Industry as Related to City Size in Developing Countries, India Case Study. Menlo Park, California: Agency of International Development, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Stevens, B. H. and C. A. Brackett.Industrial Location: A Review and Annotated Bibliography of Theoretical, Empirical, and Case Studies. Bibliography Series No. 3. Philadelphia: Regional Science Research Institute, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Stewart, C. T. “Santa Clara County, California: “A Study of the Local Impacts of Research and Research-Based Manufacturing.” Report prepared for the National Science Foundation, Washington, D. C., 1966.

  48. Stohler, J. “Zur rationalen Planung der Infrastruktur,”Konjunkturpolitik, Vol. 11 (1965), pp. 279–308.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Taebel, D. A. “The Trafficways Committee: An Experiment in Intergovernmental Cooperation in Santa Clara County.” Unpublished M. A. thesis, San Jose State College, San Jose, California, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Teitz, M. B. “Cost Effectiveness: A Systems Approach to Analysis of Urban Services,”Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 34 (1968), pp. 303–311.

    Google Scholar 

  51. — “Toward a Theory of Urban Public Facility Location,”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 21 (1968), pp. 35–51

    Google Scholar 

  52. Tinbergen, J.Economic Policy: Principles and Design. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company, 1967, 4th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Töpfer, K. “Überlegungen zur Quantifizierung qualitativer Standortfaktoren,” in Zentralinstitut für Raumplanung an der Universität Münster (Ed.)Zur Theorie der allgemeinen und der regionalen Planung. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Universitätsverlag, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Vosgerau, H. J. “Wachstumstheorie und reale langfristige Perspektiven der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung,” in R. Jochimsen and U. E. Simonis (Eds.),Theorie und Praxis der Infrastrukturpolitik. Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, New Series, Vol. 54. Berlin: Verlag von Duncker und Humblot, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Wallace, L. T. and V. W. Ruttan. “The Role of the Community as a Factor in Industrial Location,”Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 7 (1961), pp. 133–142.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Walsh, S. P. “Twelve Common Mistakes in Industrial Land Development,”Urban Land, Vol. 22 (1963), pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wingo, L.Transportation and Land Use. Washington, D. C.: Resources for the Future, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Zimmermann, H.Öffentliche Ausgaben und regionale Wirtschaftsentwicklung. Basel: Kyklos Verlag, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the Gesamthochschule Siegen, Hüttental-Weidenau, Federal Republic of Germany

    Walter Buhr

Authors
  1. Walter Buhr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buhr, W. Toward the design of intraregional infrastructure policy. Papers of the Regional Science Association 31, 213–240 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01943250

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01943250

Keywords

Search

Navigation