Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The substitution of land for other inputs in urban areas

  • Published:
Papers of the Regional Science Association

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alexander, I. “Job Location and Journey to Work: Three Australian Cities, 1961–1971.”Australian Geographical Studies, Vol. 17 (1979), pp. 155–174.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alonso, W. “A Theory of the Urban Land Market.”Papers of the Regional Science Association, Vol. 6 (1960), pp. 149–157.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —.Location and Land Use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Berry, B. “The Economics of Land Use Intensities in Melbourne, Australia.”Geographical Reivew, Vol. 64 (1974), pp. 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brueckner, J. “Urban General Equilibrium Models with Non-Central Production.”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 18 (1978), pp. 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  6. —, “A Model of Non-Central Production in a Monocentric City.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 6 (1979), pp. 444–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Clapp, J. “The Substitution of Urban Land for Other Inputs.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 6 (1979), pp. 122–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. —. “Production with Land and Nonland Factors: Which Functional Form?”Journal Urban Economics, Vol. 8 (1980), pp. 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Couch, J. “Employment Density Functions: A Theory for E. S. Mills' Conundra.”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 18 (1978), pp. 293–301.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Czananski, S. “Effects of Public Investiments on Urban Land Values,”Journal of the American Institut of Planners, Vol. 22 (1966), pp. 204–217.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Downing, P. “Factors Affecting Commercial Land Values: An Empirical Study of Milwaukee, Wisconsin.”Land Economics, Vol. 49 (1973), pp. 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fairbairn, K.Melbourne: An Urban Profile Sydney: Angus and Robertson, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fales, R. and Moses, L. “Land Use Theory and the Spatial Structure of the Nineteenth-Century City.”Papers of the Regional Science Associaton, Vol. 28 (1971), pp. 49–80.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fallis, G. “Factor Substitution, Employment Density and Suburbanization.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 6 (1979), pp. 156–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fisch, O. “Spatial Equilibrium with Locatonal Interdependencies: The Case of Environmental Spillovers.”Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 10 (1980), pp. 201–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goldstein, G. and Moses, L. “Interdependence and the Location of Economic Activities.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 2 (1975), pp. 63–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchison, T.Knowledge and Ignorance in Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lowry, I.A.Model of Metropolis. Rand Corporation, RM-4035-RC (1964).

  19. Maher, C. “The Changing Residential Role of the Inner City: The Example of Inner Melbourne.”Australian Geographer, Vol. 14 (1978), pp. 112–122.

    Google Scholar 

  20. McDonald, J. “An Empirical Test of a Theory of the Urban Housing Market.”Urban Studies, Vol. 16 (1979), pp. 291–297.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McDonald, J. and Browman, H. “Land ValueFunctions: A Reevaluatin.”Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 6 (1979), pp. 25–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McDonald, J. “Capital-Land Substitution in Urban Housing: A Survery of Empirical Estimates.”Journal of Urban Economics (forthcoming).

  23. Mills, E. “An Aggregative Model of Resource Allocation in a Metropolitan Area.”American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings, Vol. 57 (1967), pp. 197–210.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —. “The Value of Urban Land,” in H. Perloff (ed.),The Quality of the Urban Environment Washington, D.C.: Rources for the Future, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —.Studies in the Structure of the Urban Economy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —. “Markets and Efficient Resource Allocaton in Urban Areas.”Swedish Journal of Economics, Vol. 74 (1972), pp. 100–113.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —. “Mathematical Models for Urban Planning,” in A. Brown, et al. (eds.),Urban and Economics in Market and Planned Economies, New York: Praeger, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  28. —. “Planning and Market Processes in urban Models,” in R. Grieson (ed.),Public and Urban Economics. Lexington, Mass.: D. C. Heath, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —Urban Economics. (2nd Ed.) Glenview, Illinois: Scott, Foresman and Co., 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moomaw, R., “An Econometric Analysis of Industrial Land-Use Intensity within an Urban Area.”Urban Studies, Vol. 15 (1978), pp. 321–326.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muth, R. “Economic Change and Rural-Urban of Land Conversios,”Econometrica, Vol. 29 (1961), pp. 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  32. —.Cities and Housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  33. —. “Recent Developments in the Theory of Urban Spatial Structure,” in M. Intriligator (ed.).Frontiers of Quantitative Economics, Vol. 111B. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Niedercorn, J. “A Negative Exponential Model of urban Land Use Densities and Its Implications for Metropolitan Development.”Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 11 (1971), pp. 317–326.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Olcott, G.Olcott's Land Values Blue Book of Chicago and Suburbs. Chicago: G. Olcott, 1907–1981.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Orr, L.Income, Employment, and Urban Residential Location. New York: Academic Press, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Polinsky, M. and Shavell, S. “Amenities and Property Values in a Model of an Urban Area.”Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 5 (1976), pp. 119–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pryor, R. “The Recent Growth of Melbourne.”Australian Geographical Studies, Vol. 6 (1968), pp. 120–138.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Theil, H.Principles of Econometrics. New York: Wiley, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Illinois at Chicago Circle, 60680, Chicago, Illinois

    John F. McDonald (Associate Professor of Economics)

Authors
  1. John F. McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDonald, J.F. The substitution of land for other inputs in urban areas. Papers of the Regional Science Association 48, 39–52 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01940987

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01940987

Keywords

Search

Navigation