Advertisement

Papers of the Regional Science Association

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 185–195 | Cite as

A comparison of socioeconomic and structural determinants of trip tour length

  • Alan J. Horowitz
Article

Keywords

Structural Determinant Tour Length Trip Tour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Adler, Thomas and Moshe Ben-Akiva. “A theoretical and empirical model of trip chaining behavior.”Transportation Research B, 1979, Vol. 13B, pp. 243–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    Gilbert, Gorman, George L. Peterson and Joseph L. Schofer. “Markov renewal model of linked trip travel behavior.”Transportation Engineering Journal, Proceedings of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 1972, Vol. 98, TE3, pp. 691–704.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hanson, Susan. “The importance of the multi-purpose journey to work in urban travel behavior.”Transportation, 1980, Vol. 9, pp. 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    Horowitz, Alan. “A pure probabilisitic model of trip tours by automobile.”Transportation Planning and Technology, 1982, in press.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Horowitz, Joel. “A utility maximizing model of the demand for multidestination nonwork travel.”Transportation Research, 1980, Vol. 14B, pp. 307–318.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Hummon, Norman P., Reginald Baker and Linda Zemotel. “An analysis of time budgets of U.S. households: transportation energy conservation implications.” Institute for Research on Interactions of Technology and Society, University of Pittsburgh, September 1979.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Horton, Frank E. and William E. Wagner. “A Markovian analysis of urban travel behavior: pattern response by socio-occupation groups.”Highway Research Record, 1969, No. 283, pp. 19–29.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Lerman, Steven R. “The use of disaggregate choice models in semi-Markov process models of trip chaining behavior.”Transportation Science, 1979, Vol. 13, pp. 273–291.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Marble, Duane F. “A simple Markovian model of trip structures in a metropolitan region.”Papers, Regional Science Association, Western Section, 1964, pp. 150–156.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Sasaki, T. “Estimation of person trip patterns through Markov chains.” Theory of Traffic Flow and Transportation, Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium. New York: American Elsevier, 1972, pp. 119–130.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Vidakovic, Velibor S. “A distance parameter of the trip chain process.”Proceedings of the Seventh International Symposium on Transportation and Traffic Theory. Kyoto, Japan, August 1977, pp. 931–940.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Wigan, M. R. and J. M. Morris, “The transport implications of activity and time budget constraints.”Transportation Research, 1981, Vol. 15A, pp. 63–86.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Regional Science Association 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan J. Horowitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Civil Engineering DepartmentUniversity of WisconsinMilwaukee

Personalised recommendations