Papers of the Regional Science Association

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 33–45 | Cite as

Export services in postindustrial society

  • William B. Beyers
  • Michael J. Alvine
Article

Abstract

While it is evident that employment in services now dominates the U.S. economy, we still have relatively little understanding of the spatial structure of trade in services. This situation is in part a legacy of our historic tendency to focus on the markets of manufacturing and primary production sectors on the theory that they are “basic.” However, the great expansion of services employment in our economy in recent decades means this assumption needs reexamination. This paper reports the results of interviews with 2,200 service sector firms in the Central Puget Sound region, exploring their degree of export orientation. These interviews show a striking degree of export orientation within these sectors. This study suggests that interregional trade in services is probably extremely important in the economic base of all major metropolitan regions.

Keywords

Spatial Structure Service Sector Production Sector Metropolitan Region Service Employment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, J. W. 1954. The basic-nonbasic concept of urban economic functions.Economic Geography 30: 246–61.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. 1973.The coming of postindustrial society: a venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  3. Beyers, W. B. 1983. The interregional structure of the U.S. economy.International Regional Science Review 8: 213–31.Google Scholar
  4. Beyers, W. B., Alvine, M. J., and Johnsen, E. 1985.The service economy: export of services in the Central Puget Sound Region. Seattle: Central Puget Sound Economic Development District.Google Scholar
  5. Birch, D. 1984. The changing rules of the game, finding a niche in the thoughtware economy.Economic Development Commentary 8, 1: 12–16.Google Scholar
  6. Blumenfeld, H. 1955. The economic base of the metropolis.Journal of the American Institute of Planners 21: 114–32.Google Scholar
  7. Bourque, P.J. and Conway, R. S., Jr. 1976.The input-output structure of Washington state. Seattle: Graduate School of Business Administration, mimeographed.Google Scholar
  8. Carter, A. 1970.Structural change in the American economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emerson, M. J. and Hackmann, D. G. 1971.The 1969 Kansas input-output study Topeka: Kansas Department of Economic Development, Planning Division.Google Scholar
  10. Hawaii Department of Planning and Economic Development. 1972.Interindustry study of the Hawaiian economy.Google Scholar
  11. Miernyk, W. H., Shellhamer, K. L., Brown, D. M., Coccari, R. L., Gallagher, C. J., and Wineman, W. H. 1970.Simulating regional economic development. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath and Company.Google Scholar
  12. Molander, J. D. 1966. Geographic isolation and market area expansion; a study of small Washington state firms attempting to sell in the national market. D.B.A. dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, University of Washington.Google Scholar
  13. Mulligan, G. and Gibson, L. 1984. Regression estimates of economic base multipliers for small communities.Economic Geography 60: 225–37.Google Scholar
  14. Northwest Power Planning Council. 1983.Economic and Demographic Assumptions, mimeographed.Google Scholar
  15. Noyelle, T. J. 1983. The rise of advanced services.American Planning Association Journal 49, 3: 280–90.Google Scholar
  16. Noyelle, T. J. 1984. The service era, focussing public policy on people and places.Economic Development Commentary 8, 2. 12–17.Google Scholar
  17. Polese, M. 1982. Regional demand for business services and interregional service flows in a small Canadian region.Papers, Regional Science Association 50: 151–63.Google Scholar
  18. Pred, A. 1977.City-systems in advanced economies. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. Riefler, R. 1976. Implications of service industry growth for regional development strategies.Annals of Regional Science 10: 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schaffer, W. A., Laurent, E. A., and Sutter, E. M., Jr. 1972.Introducing the Georgia economic model. Atlanta: The Georgia Department of Industry and Trade.Google Scholar
  21. Stanback, T. M., Jr. and Noyelle, T. J.: 1982.Cities in transition. Totowa, NJ: Allenheld, Osmun.Google Scholar
  22. Tiebout, C. M. 1962.The community economic base study. New York: Committee on Economic Development.Google Scholar
  23. Ullman, E. L. and Dacey, M. J. 1960. The minimum requirements approach to the regional economic base.Papers, Regional Science Association. 6: 175–94.Google Scholar
  24. Washington State. 1983.Report of the emergency commission on economic development and job creation. Volume III.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Regional Science Association 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • William B. Beyers
    • 1
  • Michael J. Alvine
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of WashingtonSeattle
  2. 2.Central Puget Sound Economic Development DistrictSeattle

Personalised recommendations