Advertisement

Papers of the Regional Science Association

, Volume 69, Issue 1, pp 21–30 | Cite as

Dynamic regional multipliers and the economic base: An application of applied econometric techniques

  • Derek Bond
Applied Time Series Analysis

Abstract

This paper considers recent developments in econometrics that have helped to resolve the apparent dichotomy between time-series analysis and dynamic econometrics. In particular, the paper shows how the concepts of cointegration and error-correction models can be used in the estimation of dynamic regional multipliers. Using the results of a pilot study for Northern Ireland it is shown how the techniques provide a new method for estimating the economic base, and an encompassing approach to early conflicting results.

Keywords

Pilot Study Conflicting Result Economic Base Econometric Technique Encompassing Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J., Hendry, D. G., and Smith, G. W. 1986. Exploring equilibrium relationships in econometrics through static models: some monte-carlo evidence.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48: 253–77.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, J., Hendry, D. F., Sbra, F., and Yeo, S. 1978. Econometric modelling of aggregate timeseries relationships between consumers' expenditure and income in the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 88: 661–92.Google Scholar
  3. Engle, R. F. and Granger, C. W. J. 1988. Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing.Econometrica 55: 251–76.Google Scholar
  4. Gerking, S. D. and Isserman, A. M. 1981. Bifurcation and the time pattern of impacts in the economic base model.Journal of Regional Science 21: 451–67.Google Scholar
  5. Granger, C. W. J. 1983.Co-integrated variables and error correction models. University of California: UCSD Discussion Paper No. 83-13.Google Scholar
  6. Granger, C. W. J. and Newbold, P. 1973. Spurious regression in econometrics.Journal of Econometrics 2: 1045–66.Google Scholar
  7. Granger, C. W. J. and Wiess, A. A. 1983. Time-series analysis of error correction models. InStudies in Econometric Time-series and Multivariate Statistics, eds. S. Karlin, T. Amemiya, and L. A. Goodmens, New York: Academic Press, pp. 255–78.Google Scholar
  8. Hendry, D. F. 1986. Econometric modelling with cointegrated variables: an overivew.Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 48: 201–12.Google Scholar
  9. Isserman, A. M. 1977. A bracketing approach for estimating regional economic impact multipliers and a procedure for assessing their accuracy.Environment and Planning A 9: 1003–11.Google Scholar
  10. Moody, H. T. and Puffer, F. W. 1970. The empirical verification of the urban base multiplier: traditional and adjustment processes models.Land Economics 46: 91–8.Google Scholar
  11. Morishima, M. and Saito, M. 1972. A dynamic analysis of the American Economy 1902–1952. InThe Working of Econometric Models, eds. M. Morishima, Y. Murata, T. Nosse, and M. Saito, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–69.Google Scholar
  12. Naylor, T. H., Seaks, T. G., and Wichern, D. W. 1972. Box-Jenkins methods: an alternative to econometric models.International Statistical Review 40: 123–37.Google Scholar
  13. Park, J. Y. and Phillips, P. C. B. 1988. Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes: Part 1.Econometric Theory 4: 468–97.Google Scholar
  14. Park, J. Y. and Phillips, P. C. B. 1989. Statistical inference in regressions with integrated processes: Part 2.Econometric Theory 5: 95–131.Google Scholar
  15. Phillips, A. W. 1954. Stabilisation policy in a closed economy.Economic Journal 64: 290–323.Google Scholar
  16. Richardson, M. V. 1985. Input-output and economic base multipliers: looking backwards and forwards.Journal of Regional Science 25: 607–62.Google Scholar
  17. Sasaki, K. 1963. Military expenditure and the employment multiplier in Hawaii.Review of Economics and Statistics 45: 298–304.Google Scholar
  18. Sargan, J. D. 1964. Wages and prices in the United Kingdom: a study of econometric methodology. InEconometric Analysis for National Planning, eds. P. E. Hart, G. Mills and J. K. Whittakers, London: Butterworths, pp. 25–54.Google Scholar
  19. Sargan, J. D. and Bhargava, A. 1983. Testing residuals from least squares regressions for being generated by gausian random walk.Econometrica 51: 153–74.Google Scholar
  20. Sinclair, M. T. and Sutcliffe, C. M. S. 1983. Injection leakages, trade repercussions and the regional income multiplier: an extension.Scottish Journal of Political Economy 30: 275–86.Google Scholar
  21. Steele, D. B. 1972. A numbers game (or the return of regional multipliers).Regional Studies 6: 115–30.Google Scholar
  22. Stock, J. H. 1988. Asymptotic properties of a least squares estimator of co-integrating vectors.Econometric 55: 1035–56.Google Scholar
  23. Weiss, S. J. and Gooding, E. C. 1968. Estimation of differential employment multipliers in a small region.Land Economics 44: 235–44.Google Scholar
  24. Wickens, M. R. and Breusch, T. S. 1988. Dynamic specification, the long-run and the estimation of transformed regression models.Economic Journal, Conference Supplement 98: 189–205.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Regional Science Association 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Derek Bond
    • 1
  1. 1.ESRC Northern Ireland Regional Research LaboratoryBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations