Skip to main content
Log in

Nature in the laboratory — nature as a laboratory. Considerations about the ethics of release experiments

  • Multi-author Reviews
  • Gene Technology and Biodiversity
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Field tests with genetically modified organisms go beyond the boundaries of the politically and morally neutralized space that normally surrounds scientific experiments. They enter public areas. As a social process of shaping nature they are political in a fundamental sense. Consequences of this observation concern the legitimacy of decisions and the legitimacy of deciding procedures. The political rights of citizens and their human rights can only be respected if these procedures are democratic. Without a more serious exploration of the specific circumstances of release tests — for example, the precise ecological context, the consequences for the future development of the affected ecosystem, the social consequences, and the possible institutional ways of establishing gene technology in agriculture — we do not really know what we are doing when we release transgenic organisms. Moral judgements today can therefore only be prima facie, not free from shortcomings. As responsible judges we must confess that we are still morally blind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altmann, M., and Ammann, K., Gentechnologie im gesellschaftlichen Spannungsfeld: Züchtung transgener Kulturpflanzen. Gaia1 (1992) 204–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altner, G., Krauth, W., Lünzer, 1., and Vogtmann, H. (eds), Gentechnik und Landwirtschaft. C. F. Müller, Karlsruhe, 2nd ed. 1990.

  3. Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics (div. editions).

  4. Aquinas, Summa Theologia (div. editions).

  5. Bärlocher, Ch., Diethelm, H., Koechlin, F., and Ammann, D., Manipulierte Organismen in der Nutur? ökoscience. Zürich 1990.

  6. Böhme, G., The end of the Baconian age, in: Coping with Science, pp. 1–17. Ed. G. Böhme, Westview Press. Boulder 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diggelmann, H., Introducing the Guidelines of the Swiss Commission on Biological Security (SKBS/CSSB) for the Deliberate Release of Genetically Modified Organisms. lecture at SAGUF-Symposium. Basel 2 October 1992.

  8. Gasser, Ch. S., and Fraley, R., Genetically engineering plants for crop improvement. Science244 (1989) 1293–1299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gasser, Ch. S., and Fraley, R., Transgenic crops. Scient. Am.266/6 (1992) 34–39.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gen-Ethischer Informations Dienst GID, Journal published by Genethisches Netzwerk c.V., Berlin esp. vol. 73–80.

  11. Gill, B., Gentechnik ohne Politik. Campus, Frankfurt and New York 1991 (=Gentechnologie28).

  12. Ginzburg, L. R. (ed.), Assessing Ecological Risks of Biotechnology. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hodgeson, J., and Sugden, A. M. (eds), Planned Release of Genetically Engineered Organisms. Elsevier, Cambridge 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jonas, H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung. Versuch einer Ethik für die technologische Zivilisation. Insel. Frankfurt 1979.

  15. Jonsen, A. R., and Toulmin, S., The Abuse of Casuistry. A History of Moral Reasoning, Univ. of Calif. Press, Berkeley 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kant, I., Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hartknoch, Riga 1787.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kollek, R., Natur und Wissenschaft — von Finden zum Erfinden. Reflexionen über die Verluste der instrumentellen Vernunft. epd Dokumentation Frankfurt17 (1991) 26–34.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kowarik, I., and Sukopp, H., Oekologische Folgen der Einführung neuer Pflanzenarten. Gentechnologic10 (1986) 111–135.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kuhlmann, W., Diskursethik — Problem der Begründung und Anwendung, in: Prinzip und Applikation in der praktischen Philosophie, pp. 105–121. Ed. T. S. Seebohm. Frank Steiner, Stuttgart 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levy, S. B., and Miller, R. V. (eds), Gene Transfer in the Environment. McGraw-Hill, New York 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mooney, H. A., and Bernardi, G. (eds), Introduction of Genetically Modified Organisms into the Environment. Wiley, Chichester 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Naimon, J. S., Using expert panels to assess risks of environmental biotechnology applications: A case study of the 1986 Frostban risk assessments, in: Risk Assessment in Genetic Engineering, pp. 319–353. Eds M. A. Levin and H. S. Strauss. McGraw-Hill, New York 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popitz, H., Die normative Konstruktion von Gesellschaft. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Popper, K. R., Logik der Forschung. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen 9th ed. 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Macht über Gene und Menschen. Metakritisches zur Auseinandersetzung um die Gentechnologie und zu den Defiziten der Ethikdebatte. Widerspruch (Zürich)18 (1989) 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Biomedizinische Ethik als Diskurs über Politisches. Studia philosophica50 (1991) 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Technologieethik und die Gemeinschaft der Betroffenen. Bioethica Forum8 (1992) 6–8.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Gefährlichkeit unbekannter Gefahren. Transgene Pflanzen im Freiland? Eine Kontroverse mit Barbara Weber und Ingo Potrykus. Schweiz. Ges. für Biomedizin. Ethik, Genf 1992. (=Folia bioethica 11).

  29. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Mehr aufs Spiel setzen als das Leben. Zur Ethik technologischer Risiken, in: Leben mit Risiko. Christoph Merian Verlag, Basel 1993 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rehmann-Sutter, Ch., Welsen des Wahrnehmens. Aesth-Ethik, in: Sinnengegenwart. Essays zur Wahrnehmung. Eds Ch. Rehmann-Sutter, T. Lehmann, B. Lüem and D. Palestrina. R+R, Bottmingen 1993 (in press).

  31. Sagoff, M., On making nature safe for biotechnology, in: Assessing Ecological Risks of Biotechnology, pp. 341–365. Ed. L. R. Ginzburg. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston 1991.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Schmitt, C., Der Begriff des Politischen. Text from 1932 with foreword and three corollaries. Duncker & Humblot. Berlin 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Stiftung Gen Suisse, Die Gentechnik, eine Chance und Herausforderung. Bern 1991.

  34. Sukopp, H., Ecological long-term effects of cultivated plants returning to the wild state and of the introduction of nonnative species, Experientia49 (1993) 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Tiedje, J. M., Colwell, R. K., Grossman, Y. L., Hodson, R. E., Lenski, R. E., Mack, R. N., and Regal, P. S., The planned introduction of genetically engineered organisms: ecological considerations and recommendations. Ecology70 (1989) 298–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Walgate, R., Miracle or Menace? Biotechnology and the Third World. Panos, Budapest 1990.

  37. Weber, M., Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriß einer verstehenden Soziologie. J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen 5th ed. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Winner, L., The Whale and the Reactor. A Search for Limits in an Age of High Technology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago and London 1986.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rehmann-Sutter, C. Nature in the laboratory — nature as a laboratory. Considerations about the ethics of release experiments. Experientia 49, 190–200 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923526

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923526

Key words

Navigation