Skip to main content
Log in

Colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence in postmenopausal patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Urogynecology Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eighty-seven postmenopausal patients had a colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence. A significant postoperative reduction (p<0.001) of symptoms of frequency, nocturia, urgency and urge incontinence was obtained. The cure rate for urinary incontinence was 77%. Twenty patients were found to be wet postoperatively, 8 due to stress incontinence and 12 due to detrusor instability, 9 of whom had detrusor instability preoperatively.

No differences were found pre- and postoperatively in the cystometric and uroflowmetric values or in the urethral pressure profile measurements. The pressure transmission ratios were significantly improved postoperatively.

During operation and postoperatively, minor complications occurred in this group of patients. In 5 patients blood transfusion was needed. Urinary tract infection was diagnosed in 21 patients, wound infections in 4 patients and enterocele in 5 patients.

Colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence in postmenopausal patients is a safe procedure with a reasonable cure rate indicating that a surgical approach should be adopted in such patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burch J. Urethrovaginal fixation to Cooper's ligament for correction of stress incontinence, cystocele and prolapse.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1961; 120:613–621

    Google Scholar 

  2. Langer R, Golan A, Ron El R et al. Colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence in premenopausal and post menopausal women.Surg Obstet Gynecol 1990; 171:13–16

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hilton P, Stanton LS. Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer. The results in symptom free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1983; 90:919–933

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatia NN, Bergman A. Modified Burch versus pereyra retropubic urethropexy for stress urinary incontinence.Obstet Gynecol 1985; 66:255–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Stanton SL, Cardozo LD. Results of the colposuspension operation for incontinence and prolapse.Br J Urol 1981; 53:333–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Abrams PH, Blaivas JG, Stanton SL et al. The standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function.Int Urogynecol J 1990; 1:45–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stanton SL and Cardozo LD. Surgical treatment of incontinence in elderly women.Surg Obstet Gynecol 1980; 150:555–557

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kordu A, Ferry J, Hunter P. Colposuspension for the treatment of female urinary incontinence.Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 29:146–149

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stanton SL, Cordozo L, Williams JE, Ritchie D, Alan V. Clinical and urodynamic features of failed incontinence surgery in the female.Obstet Gynecol 1978; 51:515–520

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Langer R, Ron-el R, Neuman M, Herman A, Caspi E. Detrusor instability following colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1988; 95:607–610

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Langer R, Ron-el R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E. Colposuspension in patients with combined stress incontinence and detrusor instability.Eur Urol 1988; 14:437–439

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sand PK, Bowen LW, Panganibam R, Ostergard DR. The low pressure urethra as a factor in failed retropubic urethropexy.Obstet Gynecol 1987; 3:399–402

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hilton P, Stanton SL. Algorithmic method for assessing urinary incontinence in elderly women.Br Med J 1981; 282:940–942

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walters S, Wolf H, Bazleko, H, Jenson HK. Urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women treated with estrogens: a double blind chemical trial.Urol Int 1978; 33:135–143

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editorial Comments: This is an extension of the authors' previously published series in SGO [2] now dealing exclusively with postmenopausal patients. Although they state that their overall cure rate was 77%, in fact the cure rate for stress incontinence was 79/87 or 91%. Adding the patients with detrusor instability gives the lower cure rate of 77%. An important contribution of this article is the documentation of a decrease of symptoms of urgency, frequency and urge incontinence subsequent to a modified Burch colposuspension. In addition they document that the pressure-transmission ratios were less than 100% in all of their failed cases. Further studies are needed in the elderly to document success or failure in this group since we will be faced with an ever increasing elderly population in years to come.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Langer, R., Neuman, M., Panksy, M. et al. Colposuspension for urinary stress incontinence in postmenopausal patients. Int Urogynecol J 2, 208–211 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923386

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01923386

Keywords

Navigation