Skip to main content
Log in

Pheromone behavioral responses in unusual male European corn borer hybrid progeny not correlated to electrophysiological phenotypes of their pheromone-specific antennal neurons

  • Research Articles
  • Published:
Experientia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In genetic studies on the sex pheromone communication system of two races of European corn borer, which use opposite pheromone blends of the E and Z compounds, it was found that antennal olfactory cell response amplitudes to the two compounds were controlled by an autosomal factor, whereas behavioral responses to the blends were controlled by a sex-linked locus. Because of the difference in genetic controls, it was postulated that some unusual males would be produced in F2 crosses between these two races. These unusual males would have antennal olfactory cells that respond as the Z-race males, but would respond behaviorally to the E blend. The present studies combined behavioral studies in a flight tunnel and single cell electrophysiological studies to show that these unusual males do indeed exist. These findings show that the spike amplitude of peripheral olfactory cells is not important in regulating species- or race-specific pheromone responses, as compared to some central nervous system factor assesses the spike frequencies from different pheromone-component-specific cells on the antenna. This factor seems to be essential in governing the pheromone-blend specific behavioral responses of male moths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Klun, J. A., Chapman, O. L., Mattes, J. C., Wojkowshi, P. W., Beroza, M., and Sonnett, P. E., Science181 (1973) 661.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glover, T. J., Tang, X.-H., and Roelofs, W. L., J. chem. Ecol.13 (1987) 143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Roelofs, W. L., Du J.-W., Tang, X.-H., Robbins, P. S., and Eckenrode, C. J., J. chem. Ecol.11 (1985) 829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Roelofs, W. L., Glover, T. J., Tang, X.-H., Sreng, I., Robbins, P., Eckenrode, C. J., Löfstedt, C., Hansson, B. S., and Bengtsson B. O., Proc. natl Acad. Sci. USA84 (1987) 7585.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Glover, T. J., Campbell, M. G., Linn, J. C. E., and Roelofs, W. L., Experientia47 (1991) 980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hansson, B. S., Löfstedt C., and Roelofs, W. L., Naturwissenschaften74 (1987) 497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Glover, T. J., Perez, N., and Roelofs, W. L., J. chem. Ecol.15 (1989) 863.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Struble, D. L., Byers, J. R., McLeod, D. G. R., and Ayre, G. L., Can. Ent.119 (1987) 291.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klun, J. A., and Maini, S., Envir. Ent.8 (1979) 423.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glover, T. J., Campbell, M. G., Robbins, P. S., and Roelofs, W. L., Arch. Insect biochem. Physiol.15 (1990) 67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Löfstedt, C., Hansson, B. S., Roelofs, W. L., and Bengtsson, B. O., Genetics123 (1989) 553.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaissling, K.-E. in: Biochemistry of Sensory Functions, p. 243. Ed. L. Jaenicke, Springer, Berlin 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Van der Pers, J. N. C., J. Insect Physiol.24 (1978) 337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roelofs, W. L., and Comeau, A., Science165 (1969) 398.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Smith, J. J. B., Mitchell, B. K., Rolseth, B. M., Whitehead, A. T., and Albert, P. J., Chem. Senses15 (1990) 253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Todd, J. L., Haynes, K. F., and Baker, T. C., Physiol. Ent.17 (1992) 183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hansson, B. S., Löfstedt, C., and Foster, S. P., Ent. exp. appl.53 (1989) 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roelofs, W. L., in: Entomology Serving Society: Emerging Technologies, and Challenges, p. 179. Eds S. B. Uinson and R. Metcalf Entomological Society of America., Lanham 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Christensen, T. A., and Hildebrand, J. G., in: Arthropod Brain: Its Evolution, Development, Structure’ and Functions, p. 457. Eds. A. P. Gupta John Wiley & Son, New York 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kanzaki, R., Arbas, E. A., and Hildebrand, J. G., J. comp. Physiol. A168 (1991) 281.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kanzaki, R., Arbas, E. A., and Hildebrand, J. G., J. comp. Physiol. A169 (1991) 1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hansson, B. S., Löfstedt, C., and Foster, S. P., Ent. exp. appl.53 (1989) 137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akers, R. P., and O'Connell, R. J., J. comp. Physiol. A163 (1988) 641.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Baker, T. C., Experientia45 (1989) 248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hansson, B. S., Hallberg, E., Löfstedt, C., and Steinbrecht, R. A., Tissue, and Cell26 (1994) 503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rumbo, E. R., Chem. Senses.14 (1989) 361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J., Biometry. W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cossé, A.A., Campbell, M.G., Glover, T.J. et al. Pheromone behavioral responses in unusual male European corn borer hybrid progeny not correlated to electrophysiological phenotypes of their pheromone-specific antennal neurons. Experientia 51, 809–816 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922435

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01922435

Key words

Navigation