Advertisement

Die genetischen Grundlagen der Blütenfarben

(Sammelreferat)
  • Gerhard Benl
Abhandlungen

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturliste

  1. Afzal, M. & T. Trought., 1933. A note on a cross ofGossypium Stocksii M. Mast withGossypium indicum Gammie. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci.3, 334–338.Google Scholar
  2. Allard, H. A., 1919. Some studies in blossom color inheritance in tobacco, with special reference toN. sylvestris andN. tabacum. Amer. Nat.53, 79–84.Google Scholar
  3. Altenburg, E., 1916. Linkage inPrimula sinensis. Genetics1, 354–366.Google Scholar
  4. Anonymus, 1921. Genetic investigations in tobacco. Rept. Calif. Agric. Exper. Stat.92.Google Scholar
  5. Appl, J., 1928. Über einen Bastard vonOriganum majorana ♀ undOriganum vulgare ♂ und dessen Aufspaltung in der F2-Generation. Preslia6, 3–13.Google Scholar
  6. —, 1929. Weitere Mitteilungen über die Aufspaltungen eines Bastards zwischenOriganum majorana L. ♀ undO. vulgare L. ♂ in der F2- und F3-Generation. Genetica11, 519–558.Google Scholar
  7. Babcock, E. B. & H. M. Hall, 1924. Hemizonia congesta: A genetic, ecologic, and taxonomic study of the hayfield tarweeds. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.13, 15–100.Google Scholar
  8. Bach, S., 1919. Zur näheren Kenntnis der Faktoren der Anthozyanbildung beiPisum. Zeitschr. Pfl.-zücht.7, 64–66.Google Scholar
  9. Balls, W. L., 1907. Note on Mendelian heredity in cotton. Journ. Agric. Sci. Cambridge2, 216.Google Scholar
  10. —, 1908. Mendelian studies of Egyptian cotton. Journ. Agric. Sci. Cambridge2, 346–379.Google Scholar
  11. —, 1910. Some complications in Mendel cotton breeding. Bull. Inst. Egypt5 sér. 3, 120.Google Scholar
  12. —, 1911. Mendelian inheritance in hybrids of Upland and Egyptian cotton. Ann. Rept. Amer. Breed. Assoc.6, 254–267.Google Scholar
  13. Barker, E. E., 1917. Heredity studies in the morning-glory (Ipomoea purpurea [L.] Roth). Cornell Univ. Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull.392, 1–38.Google Scholar
  14. Bateson, W., 1902. Note on the resolution of compound characters by cross-breeding. Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc.12, 50–54.Google Scholar
  15. —, 1907. The progress of genetics since the rediscovery of Mendel's papers. Progr. Rei Bot.1, 368–418.Google Scholar
  16. -, 1909. Mendel's principles of heredity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. —, 1914. Address to the president of the British association for the advancement of science. Science n. s.40, 287–302.Google Scholar
  18. — & E. R. Saunders, 1902. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London,1, 1–160.Google Scholar
  19. —, — & R. C. Punnett, 1905. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London,2, 1–154.Google Scholar
  20. —, —, —, 1906a. Further experiments on inheritance in sweet peas and stocks. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B.77, 236–238.Google Scholar
  21. —, —, —, 1906b. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London,3, 1–53.Google Scholar
  22. —, —, —, 1908. Experimental studies in the physiology of heredity. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Coc. London,4, 1–60.Google Scholar
  23. Baur, E., 1908. Einige Ergebnisse der experimentellen Vererbungslehre. Beih. Med. Klinik4, 265–292.Google Scholar
  24. —, 1910. Vererbungs- und Bastardierungsversuche mitAntirrhinum. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.3, 34–98.Google Scholar
  25. -, 1911/14/19/22/30. Einführung in die experimentelle Vererbungslehre. Berlin.Google Scholar
  26. Baur, E., 1912. Vererbungs- und Bastardierungsversuche mitAntirrhinum. II. Faktorenkoppelung. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.6, 201–216.Google Scholar
  27. -, 1924. Untersuchungen über das Wesen, die Entstehung und Vererbung von Rassenunterschieden beiAntirrhinum majus. Biblioth. Gen.4.Google Scholar
  28. —, 1926. Untersuchungen über Faktorenmutationen. II und III. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.-u. Vererbgsl.41, 251–258.Google Scholar
  29. —, O. Herzberg-Fränkel, B. Husfeld, N. Saulescu & E. Schiemann, 1929. Koppelungserscheinungen beiAntirrhinum majus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.50, 314–343.Google Scholar
  30. Beatus, R., 1936. Genetische und zytologische Untersuchungen in derVeronica-GruppeFruticulosa der SektionVeronicastrum. Flora30, 153–175.Google Scholar
  31. Becker, J., 1918. Vererbung gewisser Blütenmerkmale beiPapaver Rhoeas L. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Zücht.6, 215–221.Google Scholar
  32. Beckmann, I., 1928. Kreuzungsuntersuchungen anDelphinium orientale. Hereditas11, 107–128.Google Scholar
  33. Bedell, B. S., 1927. The inheritance of certain characters inImpatiens balsamina. Linn. Gard. Chron.82, 349–351.Google Scholar
  34. Béguinot, A., 1925. Ricerche ibridologiche su alcune razze diPapaveri. Atti Soc. Nat. Mat. Modena. ser. 6,4 (56), 1–18.Google Scholar
  35. —, 1928. Ulteriori notizie sulla ibridologia delPapaver Rhoeas L. con speciole riguardo alla razza „Shirley“. Atti Soc. Nat. Mat. Modena, ser. 6,7 (59), 175–190.Google Scholar
  36. Belling, J., 1912. Second generation of the cross betweenVelvet andLyon beans. Univ. Florida Agric. Exper. Stat. Rept. 1911, 82–104.Google Scholar
  37. -, 1913. Third generation of the cross betweenVelvet andLyon beans. Univ. Florida Agric. Exper. Stat. Rept. 1912, 115–127.Google Scholar
  38. -, 1914. Inheritance of purple color and time of flowering in velvet bean crosses. Univ. Florida Agric. Exper. Stat. Rept. 1913, 108–131.Google Scholar
  39. Black, W., 1930. Notes on the progenies of various potato hybrids. Journ. Gen.22, 27–43.Google Scholar
  40. Blakeslee, A. F., 1921. A chemical method of distinguishing genetic types of yellow cones ofRudbeckia. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.25, 211–221.Google Scholar
  41. — & B. T. Avery, 1917. Adzuki beans and Jimson weeds. Journ. Her.8, 125–131.Google Scholar
  42. —, J. Belling & M. E. Farnham, 1923. Inheritance in tetraploid Daturas. Bot. Gaz.76, 329–373.Google Scholar
  43. Breslavetz (Breslavec), L. P., 1918. Sur l'hérédité de la coloration de la corolle et des feuilles chez leTropaeolum majus L. Journ. Soc. Bot. Russie,3, 23–39.Google Scholar
  44. —, 1920. Über die Erblichkeit der Farbe der Blumenkrone beiTropaeolum majus L. 2. Teil. Mitt. Gelehrten Inst. Lessgaft Petersb.3, 63–68.Google Scholar
  45. Brieger, F., 1929. Vererbung bei Artbastarden unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der GattungNicotiana. Züchter,1, 140–152.Google Scholar
  46. —, 1932. Faktorenanalyse bei Sippenbastarden vonAquilegia vulgaris. Biol. Zbl.52, 430–436.Google Scholar
  47. — & A. J. Mangelsdorf, 1926. Linkage between a flower color factor and self-sterility factors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.12, 248–255.Google Scholar
  48. Brožek, A., 1920. Mosaikový míšenecMimulus tigrinoides Hort., hybrid var.Paulina (var. nova). Biologické Listy. Praha,7, 8–12.Google Scholar
  49. —, 1921. Jednoduchý připad mendelovského dědění v. krebsě květů dvou rasMimulus quinquevulnerus Hort. Biologické Listy, Praha,8, 13–33.Google Scholar
  50. —, 1922. Polymerické dědění skorn květů reciproknich mišencůMimulus tigrinus-luteus × M. quinquevulnerus-rubinus. (Summary report in a case of cumulative factors in the inheritance of the spots of the flowers in the hybrids ofMimulus tigrinusluteus × M. quinquevulnerus-rubinus.) Preslia, Praha,2, 13–25.Google Scholar
  51. Brožek, A., 1923. Hauptresultate der Kreuzungsexperimente mitMimulus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.30, 319–323.Google Scholar
  52. —, 1926. Inheritance in monkey-flower. A genetic study in crosses betweenMimulus quinquevulnerus, M. tigrinus andM. tigrinoides. Journ. Her.17, 113–129.Google Scholar
  53. —, 1929. Preliminary report on the genetic constitution of flower colours in the garden population ofMimulus cardinalis Hort. Acta Bot. Bohemica8, 80–85.Google Scholar
  54. -, 1931a. Remarks on the genetic constitution of flower-colours inMimulus cardinalis Hort. Rept. Proc. V. Int. Bot. Congr. Cambridge, 251–252.Google Scholar
  55. —, 1931b. Further investigations on the genetics of flower colours inMimulus cardinalis Hort. Preslia, Praha,10, 42–46.Google Scholar
  56. —, 1932. Mendelian analysis of the ’red-orange-yellow‘ group of flower-colours inMimulus cardinalis hort. Preslia, Praha,11, 16–25.Google Scholar
  57. Burd, L. S., 1926. Sea Island cotton: Inheritance of corolla colour. Trop. Agric. Trinidad,3, 56–57.Google Scholar
  58. Burlingame, L., 1921. Variation and heredity inLupinus. Amer. Nat.55, 427–448.Google Scholar
  59. Buxton, B. H., 1926. Genetics of the Wisley Blueprimrose. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.51, 305–310.Google Scholar
  60. —, 1932. Genetics of theprimrose P. acaulis. Journ. Gen.25, 195–205.Google Scholar
  61. Capinpin, J. M., 1935. A genetic study of certain characters in varietal hybrids of cowpea. Philippine Journ. Sci.57, 149–165.Google Scholar
  62. Carver, W. A., 1929. The inheritance of certain seed, leaf and flower characters inGossypium hirsutum and some of their genetic interrelations. Journ. Amer. Soc. Agron.21, 467–480.Google Scholar
  63. Chittenden, R. J., 1928a. Notes on species crosses inPrimula, Godetia, Nemophila andPhacelia. Journ. Gen.19, 285–314.Google Scholar
  64. —, 1928b. Ever-sporting races ofMyosotis. Journ. Gen.20, 123–129.Google Scholar
  65. Christow, M., 1925. Inheritance studies with some tobacco varieties. God. Sofiisk. Univ. Agron. Fakult.3, 1–35.Google Scholar
  66. Clausen, J., 1927. Genetical and cytological investigations onViola tricolor L. andViola arvensis Murr. Hereditas8, 1–156.Google Scholar
  67. —, 1930. Inheritance of variegation and of black flower colour inViola tricolor L. Hereditas13, 342–356.Google Scholar
  68. —, 1931. Cyto-genetic and taxonomic investigations onMelanium Violets. Hereditas15, 219–308.Google Scholar
  69. Clausen, R. E., 1930. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. X. Carmine-coral variegation. Cytologia1, 358–368.Google Scholar
  70. — & T. H. Goodspeed, 1921. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. II. On the existence of genetically distinct red-flowering varieties. Amer. Nat.55, 328–334.Google Scholar
  71. Cockerell, T. D. A., 1914a. Suppression and loss of characters in sunflower. Science n. s.40, 283–285.Google Scholar
  72. —, 1914b. Sunflower problems. Science n. s.40, 708–709.Google Scholar
  73. —, 1915a. The marking factor in sunflowers. Journ. Her.6, 542–545.Google Scholar
  74. —, 1915b. An early observation on the red sunflower. Science n. s.41, 33–34.Google Scholar
  75. —, 1917. Adult characters in sunflower seedlings. Journ. Her.8, 361–362.Google Scholar
  76. —, 1918. The story of the red sunflower. Nat. Hist. Journ. Amer. Mus.18, 38–47.Google Scholar
  77. Connors, C. H., 1914. Heredity studies with the Carnation. Proc. Soc. Hort. Sci. 11. Ann. Meet. 95–100.Google Scholar
  78. Cook, O. F., 1913. Heredity and cotton breeding. U. S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Plant. Ind. Bull.256, 1–113.Google Scholar
  79. Correns, C., 1900a. Über Levkojenbastarde. Zur Kenntnis der Grenzen der Mendel'schen Regeln. Bot. Zbl.84, 97–113.Google Scholar
  80. —, 1900b. Gregor Mendels „Versuche über Pflanzenhybriden“ und die Bestätigung ihrer Ergebnisse durch die neuesten Untersuchungen. Bot. Zeitg.58, 229–235.Google Scholar
  81. —, 1901. Die Ergebnisse der neuesten Bastardforschungen für die Vererbungslehre. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.19, (71)-(94).Google Scholar
  82. —, 1902. Über Bastardierungsversuche mitMirabilis-Sippen. Erste Mitteilung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.20, 594–608.Google Scholar
  83. —, 1903a. Über die dominierenden Merkmale der Bastarde. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.21, 133–147.Google Scholar
  84. —, 1903b. Weitere Beiträge zur Kenntnis der dominierenden Merkmale und der Mosaikbildung der Bastarde. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.21, 195–201.Google Scholar
  85. —, 1904. Ein typisch spaltender Bastard zwischen einer einjährigen und einer zweijährigen Sippe desHyoscyamus niger. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.22, 517–524.Google Scholar
  86. —, 1905. Zur Kenntnis der scheinbar neuen Merkmale der Bastarde. (Zweite Mitteilung über Bastardierungsversuche mitMirabilis-Sippen.) Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.23, 70–85.Google Scholar
  87. -, 1912. Die neuen Vererbungsgesetze. Berlin.Google Scholar
  88. Crane, M. B. & W. J. C. Lawrence, 1934. The genetics of garden plants. London. (Macmillan.)Google Scholar
  89. Crebert, H., 1933. Beiträge zu einer genotypischen Analyse der Ackerbohne (Vicia Faba L.) nach M. J. Sirks. Züchter5, 105–114.Google Scholar
  90. Dahlgren, K. V. O., 1918. Über einige Kreuzungsversuche mitChelidonium majus L.,Polemonium coeruleum L. undLactuca muralis L. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.12, 103–110.Google Scholar
  91. —, 1923. Korsningsförsök medPolemonium coeruleum. Vortrag gehalten bei Sitzung in „Botaniska Sektionen av Naturvetenskapliga Studentsällskapet i Uppsala“ am 10. Okt. 1922. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.17, 119.Google Scholar
  92. —, 1924a. Vererbungsversuche mitPolemonium coeruleum. Hereditas5, 17–28.Google Scholar
  93. —, 1924b. Kreuzungskleinigkeiten. Versuche mitCapsella bursa pastoris, Lactuca muralis, Fagopyrum emarginatum, Geranium robertianum, Geum rivale, Dracocephalum thymiflorum u.Nicandra physaloides. Hereditas5, 222–230.Google Scholar
  94. Darlington, C. D., 1929. Variegation and albinism inVicia Faba. Journ. Gen.21, 161–168.Google Scholar
  95. Dave, B. B., 1934. Inheritance of characters inCajanus indicus. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci. Delhi4, 674–691.Google Scholar
  96. Davis, D. W., 1927. Inheritance of flower colors associated with green-stem color in the garden balsam. Anat. Rec.37, 179.Google Scholar
  97. — & L. A. Taylor, 1928. A survey of flower colors in the garden balsam and of the genes affecting them. Anat. Rec.41, 107.Google Scholar
  98. Demerec, M., 1926.Delphinium Ajacis. Yearb. Carnegie Inst. Washington25, 35–36.Google Scholar
  99. —, 1931. The behaviour of the mutable genes ofDelphinium ajacis. V. Int. Congr. Cambr. Rept. Proc. 196–197 (s. a. Journ. Gen.24, 179–193).Google Scholar
  100. Deshpande, R. B., 1933. Studies in Indian Chillies. 3. The inheritance of some characters inCapsicum annuum L. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci.3, 219–300.Google Scholar
  101. East, E. M., 1910. Inheritance in potatoes. Amer. Nat.44, 424–430.Google Scholar
  102. —, 1916. Inheritance in crosses betweenNicotiana Langsdorffii andNicotiana alata. Genetics1, 311–333.Google Scholar
  103. —, 1928. The genetics of the genusNicotiana. Bibliogr. Gen.4, 243–320.Google Scholar
  104. —, 1933. Genetic observations on the genusLinaria. Genetics18, 324–328.Google Scholar
  105. Emerson, R. A., 1902. Preliminary account of variation in bean hybrids. 15. Ann. Rept. Nebr. Agric. Exper. Stat. 30–49.Google Scholar
  106. Emme, E. K., 1931. Review of the literature on the genetics of the cotton plant. Bull. Appl. Bot., Genet. & Plant. Breed.26, 129–178.Google Scholar
  107. —, 1932a. Über Chromosomen der Baumwolle, Vererbung ihrer Blüten-, Frucht- und Samenmerkmale. (Sammelreferat.) Züchter4, 9–18.Google Scholar
  108. —, 1932b. Vererbung vegetativer und physiologischer Merkmale der Baumwolle und Besprechung weiterer Fragen über die Genetik der Baumwolle. (Sammelreferat.) Züchter4, 39–49.Google Scholar
  109. —, 1936. Genetik der Kartoffel. I. Vererbung der Blütenfärbung bei 24-chromosomigen Kartoffelarten. Biologicheskij Zhurnal. Moskwa. V.6, 977–1000.Google Scholar
  110. Enomoto, N., 1927. Further studies on the ever-segregating race inPortulaca grandiflora L., with special reference to a case of triple allelomorphism. Jap. Journ. Bot.3, 267–288.Google Scholar
  111. Erith, A. G., 1928. Some hybrids of varieties of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Journ. Gen.19, 351–355.Google Scholar
  112. —, 1930. The inheritance of colour, size and form of seeds, and of flower colour inVicia Faba L. Genetica12, 477–510.Google Scholar
  113. Fedotov, V. S., 1930. On the heredity factors of flower colour and of some other characters in the pea. Proc. U.S.S.R. Congr. Gen. Plant- & Animal-Breed.2, 523.Google Scholar
  114. —, 1930. On the heredity factors of flower colour and of some other characters inGossypium hirsutum and some of their genetic interrelations. Journ. Amer. Soc. Agron.21, 467–480.Google Scholar
  115. —, 1936. Genetica antotsianovoi pigmentatsii u gorokha. (The genetics of anthocyanin pigmentation in peas.) Trudy po Prikladuoi Botanike, Genetike i Selektsii, Ser. 2,9, 163–274.Google Scholar
  116. Feng, C. F., 1935. Genetical and cytological study of species hybrids of Asiatic and American cottons. Bot. Gaz.96, 485–504.Google Scholar
  117. Fleming, W. M., 1928. A case of natural crossing in sweet peas. Sci. Agric. Ottawa,8, 386–387.Google Scholar
  118. —, 1930. Inheritance of colour in asters. A preliminary report. Sci. Agric. Ottawa,10, 272–275.Google Scholar
  119. Fletcher, F., 1907. Mendelian heredity in cotton. Journ. Agric. Sci. Cambridge,2, 281 bis 282.Google Scholar
  120. Focke, W. O., 1881. Die Pflanzen-Mischlinge. Berlin.Google Scholar
  121. Frimmel, F., 1920. Über einen Versuch der Züchtung schwarzer Farbtöne an der Gartenprimel. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.7, 346–356.Google Scholar
  122. —, 1932. Die genetischen Grundlagen für die Farbenzüchtung der Gartenprimel. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.17, 173–185.Google Scholar
  123. Fruwirth, C., 1904. Beiträge zu den Grundlagen der Züchtung einiger landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen. II. Naturw. Zeitschr. Land- u. Forstwirtsch.2, 18–47.Google Scholar
  124. -, 1906a. Die Züchtung der landwirtschaftlichen Kulturpflanzen. 3. Bd. Berlin.Google Scholar
  125. —, 1906b. Beiträge zu den Grundlagen der Züchtung einiger landwirtschaftlicher Kulturpflanzen. IV. Naturw. Zeitschr. Land- u. Forstwirtsch.4, 50–55, 65–83.Google Scholar
  126. -, 1909a. Die Züchtung der landwirtschaftlichen Kulturpflanzen. Bd. 2 und 3 (1910). Berlin.Google Scholar
  127. —, 1909b. Spaltungen bei Folgen von Bastardierung und von spontaner Variabilität. Arch. Rass. u. Ges. Biol.6, 433–469.Google Scholar
  128. -, 1910. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenzüchtung. Bd. 3, 2. Aufl.Google Scholar
  129. —, 1912. Zur Züchtung der Kartoffel. Deutsche Landw. Presse39, 551–552; 565–567.Google Scholar
  130. -, 1919. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenzüchtung. Bd. 3, Berlin.Google Scholar
  131. —, 1920. Neunzehn Jahre Geschichte einer reinen Linie der Futtererbse. Fühlings landw. Zeitg.69, 1–28.Google Scholar
  132. Fruwirth, C., 1922. Handbuch der landwirtschaftlichen Pflanzenzüchtung. Bd. 2, Berlin.Google Scholar
  133. —, 1925. Die Genetik der Kartoffel. Bibliogr. Gen.1, 315–362.Google Scholar
  134. Fyson, P. F., 1908. Some experiments in the hybridising of Indian cottons. Mem. Dept. Agric. India. Pusa. Bot. Ser.2, Nr. 6, 1–29.Google Scholar
  135. Gairdner, A. E., 1936. The inheritance of factors inCheiranthus Cheiri. Journ. Gen.32, 479–486.Google Scholar
  136. Gilbert, A. W., 1915. Heredity of colour inPhlox Drummondii. Journ. Agric. Res.4, 293–302.Google Scholar
  137. Goddijn, W. A., 1926. Kweekproeven met eenjarige vormen binnen Linné's soortHyoscyamus niger. Genetica8, 161–328.Google Scholar
  138. Graham, R. J. D. & S. C. Roy, 1924. Linseed (Linum usitatissimum) hybrids. Agric. Journ. India19, 28–31.Google Scholar
  139. Gregory, R. P., 1907. On the inheritance of certain characters inPrimula sinensis. Rept. 77th Meet. Brit. Assoc. Leicester, 691–693.Google Scholar
  140. —, 1909. Note on the histology of the giant and ordinary forms ofPrimula sinensis. Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc.15 (1910), 239–246.Google Scholar
  141. —, 1911a. Experiments withPrimula sinensis. Journ. Gen.1, 73–132.Google Scholar
  142. —, 1911b. On gameting coupling and repulsion inPrimula sinensis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,84, 12–15.Google Scholar
  143. —, 1914. On the genetics of tetraploid plants inPrimula sinensis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,87, 484–492.Google Scholar
  144. —, D. de Winton & W. Bateson, 1923. Genetics ofPrimula sinensis. Journ. Gen.13, 219–253.Google Scholar
  145. Griffee, F. & J. A. Fairchild, 1928. A preliminary note on inheritance in cotton. Univ. Oklahoma Bull. (Proc. Oklahoma Acad. Sci.)8, 65–69.Google Scholar
  146. Haan, H. de, 1930. Contributions to the genetics ofPisum. Genetica12, 321–440.Google Scholar
  147. Haase-Bessell, G., 1916. Digitalisstudien. 1. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbungsl.16, 293–314.Google Scholar
  148. —, 1926. Digitalisstudien. 3. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.42, 1–46.Google Scholar
  149. Hagem, O., 1919. Einige F2- und F3-Generationen bei dem BastardMedicago sativa × M. falcata. Nyt Magazin. f. Naturvidenskaberne56, 149–165.Google Scholar
  150. Hagiwara, T., 1922a. The inheritance of the tube-characters in the morning glory. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,36, (63)-(79).Google Scholar
  151. —, 1922b. Genetic studies of corolla-design in the morning glory. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,36, (205)-(225). Rés. S. 157/8.Google Scholar
  152. —, 1923. Genetic studies of flower colour in the morning glory. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,37, (41)-(62), (71)–(84). Rés. S. 34/5.Google Scholar
  153. —, 1926a. Genetic studies of corolla pattern in the morning glory. II. On the six kinds of the corolla-pattern. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,40, 203–225.Google Scholar
  154. —, 1926b. Genetic studies in Balsam. I. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,40, 295–306.Google Scholar
  155. —, 1927. Genetic studies of leaf-characters of morning glories. VI. On the relation between „Tomby“ leaf and the pigmentation of tubes, and on the „Tobo“ linkage group. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,41, 648–664.Google Scholar
  156. —, 1928a. Genetico-physiological studies on the formation of pigments in several organs of Japanese morning glories. (Preliminary report.) Bot Mag. Tokyo,42, 137–154, 293–301.Google Scholar
  157. —, 1928b. Genetic studies of flower-colours in Japanese morning glories. II. On the complementary factors concerning the shade of flower-colours. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,42, 395–408.Google Scholar
  158. Hagiwara, T., 1929a. Genetic studies of flower-colours in Japanese morning glories. III. Inhibiting factors of the factor concerning the shade of flower-colour. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,43, 106–117.Google Scholar
  159. —, 1929b. Genetic studies on the dominant white flower inPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,43, 133–145.Google Scholar
  160. —, 1929c. On the rôle of the factors C and R in the production of flower colours inPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,43, 643–656.Google Scholar
  161. —, 1930a. Genetic studies of flower-colours in Japanese morning glories. IV. A factor for faint coloration and its linkage relation with other factors. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,44, 573–580.Google Scholar
  162. —, 1930b. Genetic studies of flower-colours in Japanese morning glories. V. A basic factor Ca to develop flower colour together with other basic ones C, R. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,44, 580–591.Google Scholar
  163. —, 1930c. Genetic studies of flower-colours in Japanese morning glories. VI. Two factors A1, A2 having a complemental relation with the basic factor R for the development of flower colours. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,44, 591–595.Google Scholar
  164. —, 1931. The genetics of flower-colours inPharbitis Nil. Journ. Coll. Agric. Imp. Univ. Tokyo,11, 241–262.Google Scholar
  165. —, 1932. On the genetico-physiological studies of the colour-development of flowers inPharbitis Nil. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo,8, 54–57.Google Scholar
  166. Hallquist, C., 1915. Brassicakreuzungen. Bot. Notis. 97–112.Google Scholar
  167. —, 1921. The inheritance of the flower colour and the seed colour inLupinus angustifolius. Hereditas2, 299–363.Google Scholar
  168. Harland, S. C., 1915. A study of inheritance on the cotton hybrid,Sea Island and nativeSt. Croix. St. Croix Agric. Exper. Stat. Rept. 1913–15, 50–60 (lt. H. Matsuura, 1933, S. 115.)Google Scholar
  169. —, 1919. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Journ. Gen.8, 101–132.Google Scholar
  170. —, 1920a. Inheritance of certain characters in the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). II. Journ. Gen.10, 193–205.Google Scholar
  171. -, 1920b. Inheritance inDolichos lablab L. 219–226.Google Scholar
  172. —, 1920c. Studies of inheritance in cotton. I. The inheritance of corolla colour. West. Ind. Bull.18, 13–19.Google Scholar
  173. —, 1922. Inheritance of certain characters of the cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Part III. The small-eye pattern of the seed-coat. Journ. Gen.12, 254.Google Scholar
  174. —, 1927. An account of the programme of work of the genetics department. Cotton Research Station, Trinidad. Empire Cotton Growing Review4, 325–329.Google Scholar
  175. —, 1928. Cotton notes. Trop. Agric. Trinidad5, 237–238.Google Scholar
  176. —, 1929a. The genetics of cotton I. The inheritance of petal spot in New World Cottons. Journ. Gen.20, 365–385.Google Scholar
  177. —, 1929b. The work of the genetics department of the Cotton Research Station, Trinidad. Empire Cotton Growing Review6, 304–314.Google Scholar
  178. —, 1929c. The genetics of cotton. Part III. The inheritance of corolla colour in New World Cotton. Journ. Gen.21, 95–111.Google Scholar
  179. —, 1930a. Recent work on the genetics of cotton. Trop. Agric. Trinidad,7, 16–18.Google Scholar
  180. —, 1930b. Cotton notes. Trop. Agric. Trinidad,7, 132–133.Google Scholar
  181. —, 1932. The genetics ofGossypium. Bibliogr. Gen.9, 107–178.Google Scholar
  182. —, 1935. The genetics of cotton. XII. Homologous genes for anthocyanin pigmentation in New and Old World Cottons. Journ. Gen.30, 465–476.Google Scholar
  183. Harland, S. C., 1936. Duplicate genes for corolla colour inGossypium barbadense L. andG. Darwinii Watt. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.71, 417–419.Google Scholar
  184. —, 1937. The genetics of cotton. XVII. Increased mutability of a gene inG. purpurascens as a consequence of hybridization withG. hirsutum. Journ. Her.34, 153–168.Google Scholar
  185. Heribert-Nilsson, N., 1912. Ärftlihgetsförsök med blomfärgen hosAnagallis arvensis. Bot. Notis. 229–235.Google Scholar
  186. -, 1913a. Et ärftlighetsexperiment med blomfärgen hosCentaurea scabiosa. Bot. Notis. 264–266.Google Scholar
  187. —, 1913b. Potatisvörädling och potatisbedömming. W. Weibulls Illustr. Årsbok. Landskrona,8, 4–31.Google Scholar
  188. Hertwig, P., 1927. Vererbungslehre. Tabulae Biologicae v. C. Oppenheimer u. L. Pincussen. Bd. 4, 114–215. V.Google Scholar
  189. Hildebrand, F., 1900. Über Bastardierungsexperimente zwischen einigenHepatica-Arten. Bot. Zbl.84, 65–73.Google Scholar
  190. Hiorth, G., 1930. Genetische Versuche mitCollinsia bicolor. I. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.55, 127–144.Google Scholar
  191. Honing, J. A., 1914. Kruisingsproeven metCanna indica. Versl. van de Gewone Vergaderingen Wiss. Nat. Afd.22, 2, 773–779.Google Scholar
  192. —, 1923.Canna crosses. Mededeel. Landbouwhoogeschool. Wageningen,26, II, 1–56.Google Scholar
  193. Howard, G. L. C., 1913. Studies inIndian tobaccos. No. 3. The inheritance of characters inNicotiana tabacum L. Mem. Dept. Agric. India. Pusa. Bot. Ser. 6, Nr. 3, 25–114.Google Scholar
  194. Howard, A. & G. L. C., 1924. Studies in Indian fibre Plants. No. 3. On the inheritance of characters inHibiscus Sabdariffa L. Mem. Dept. Agric. India Pusa. Bot. Ser. 13, Nr. 3, 47–85.Google Scholar
  195. Hurst, C. C., 1901/2. Mendel's „Law“ applied to orchid hybrids. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.26, 688–695.Google Scholar
  196. —, 1902/3. Mendel's principles applied to orchid hybrids. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.27, 614–624.Google Scholar
  197. -, 1906. Mendelian characters in plants and animals. Rept. III. Int. Conf. Gen. Roy. Hort. Soc. London, 114–129.Google Scholar
  198. —, 1909. Inheritance of albinism in orchids. Gard. Chron. London,45, 81–82.Google Scholar
  199. —, 1910/11. Mendel's Law of heredity and its application to horticulture. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.36, 22–52.Google Scholar
  200. —, 1911. Mendelian characters in plants, animals and man. Verh. Naturf. Ver. Brünn,49, 192–213.Google Scholar
  201. —, 1912. The application of genetics to orchid breeding. Gard. Chron.52, 373–375.Google Scholar
  202. —, 1913. The application of genetics to orchid breeding. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.38, 411 bis 429.Google Scholar
  203. -, 1925. Experiments in Genetics. Cambridge (Univ. Press).Google Scholar
  204. Hutchison, J. B., 1931. The genetics of cotton. IV. The inheritance of corolla colour and petal size in Asiatic cottons. Journ. Gen.24, 325–353.Google Scholar
  205. —, 1932a. Cotton notes: inheritance of corolla colour in some Indian cottons. Trop. Agric. Trinidad,9, 4, 126–127.Google Scholar
  206. —, 1932b. The genetics of cotton. VIII. The inheritance of anthocyanin pigmentation in Asiatic cottons. Journ. Gen.26, 317–339.Google Scholar
  207. Ikeno, S., 1913. Studien über die Bastarde von Paprika (Capsicum annuum). Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.10, 99–114.Google Scholar
  208. —, 1921. Studies on the genetics of flower-colours inPortulaca grandiflora. Journ. Coll. Agric. Japan. Univ. Tokyo,8, 93–133.Google Scholar
  209. Ikeno, S., 1922. Vererbungsversuche über die Blütenfarbe beiPortulaca grandiflora. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.29, 122–135.Google Scholar
  210. —, 1924. Studien über die Vererbung der Blütenfarbe beiPortulaca grandiflora. 2. Mitt. Jap. Journ. Bot.2, 45–62.Google Scholar
  211. —, 1928. Studien über die Vererbung der Blütenfarbe beiPortulaca grandiflora. 3. Mitt. Mosaikfarbe. Jap. Journ. Bot.4, 189–217.Google Scholar
  212. Imai, Y., 1919. Genetic studies in morning glory. I. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,33, (233)-(260), (273)–(283).Google Scholar
  213. —, 1920. Genetic studies in morning glories. III. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,34, (217)-(247).Google Scholar
  214. —, 1921a. Genetic studies in morning glories. IV. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,35, (49)-(60).Google Scholar
  215. —, 1921b. Genetic studies in morning glories. IV. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,35, (73)-(83).Google Scholar
  216. —, 1921c. Genetic studies in morning glories. V. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,35, (225)-(238).Google Scholar
  217. —, 1922. Genetic studies in morning glories. VI. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,36, (45)-(48).Google Scholar
  218. —, 1924a. Genetic studies in morning glories. VII. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,38, (9)-(16), 21.Google Scholar
  219. —, 1924b. Genetic studies in morning glories. XIII. On the behavior of the „Sasa“ leaf and the phenomena of mutation inPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,38, 185–220.Google Scholar
  220. —, 1925. Genetic studies in morning glories. XV. On the eversporting behavior of cream flowers inPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,39, (43)-(52).Google Scholar
  221. —, 1926. Genetic studies in morning glories. XVII. On the white margin ofPharbitis Nil. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,40, 496–498.Google Scholar
  222. —, 1927a. Genetic studies in morning glories. XIX. On the behavior of some factor for white margin. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,41, 389–398.Google Scholar
  223. —, 1927b. Further studies on the genetics of the white margined flower of the Japanese morning glory. Genetica9, 101–115.Google Scholar
  224. —, 1927c. A genetic analysis of white-margined flowers in the Japanese morning-glory. Genetics12, 199–241.Google Scholar
  225. —, 1927d. The genetics ofPharbitis purpurea. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,9, 199–222.Google Scholar
  226. —, 1929. Linkage groups of the Japanese morning glory. Genetics14, 223–255.Google Scholar
  227. —, 1930a. Description of the genes found inPharbitis Nil. Genetica12, 297–318.Google Scholar
  228. —, 1930b. Segregating data on the flower colour ofPharbitis Nil. Jap. Journ. Gen.6, 61–92.Google Scholar
  229. —, 1931a. Analysis of flower colour inPharbitis Nil. Journ. Gen.24, 203–224.Google Scholar
  230. —, 1931b. Linkage studies inPharbitis Nil. II. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.-u. Vererbgsl.58, 317–331.Google Scholar
  231. —, 1934a. On the mutable genes ofPharbitis, with special reference to their bearing on the mechanism of bud-variation. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,12, 479–523.Google Scholar
  232. —, 1934b. Ursprung und Entwicklung, Vererbung und Züchtung der japanischen Trichterwinde. Gartenbauwirtschaft9, 135–141.Google Scholar
  233. —, 1935a. Variegated flowers and their derivatives by bud variation. Journ. Gen.30, 1–13.Google Scholar
  234. —, 1935b. Reversions of white flowers inPharbitis Nil. Jap. Journ. Gen.11, 30.Google Scholar
  235. —, 1936. Sports of perpetual carnations. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,14, 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
  236. —, 1937. Bud variation in a flaked strain ofRhododendron obtusum. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,14, 2, 93–98.Google Scholar
  237. — & B. Kanna, 1934. Linkage studies inPharbitis Nil. IV. Genetica16, 467–475.Google Scholar
  238. — & —, 1935. A form afPortulaca grandiflora bearing creamish flowers with yellow and orange stripes. Genetica17, 27–31.Google Scholar
  239. — & K. Tabuchi, 1929. Dominant mutations of the Japanese morning glory. Amer. Nat.63, 362–366.Google Scholar
  240. Ishihara, M., R. Kôketsu & H. Kojima, 1922. Über die Vererbung der Blütenfarbe einiger Sippen vonPapaver somniferum. Jap. Journ. Gen.1, 185–193.Google Scholar
  241. Janczewski, E. de, 1889. Mięszańce Zawilców. Część II. (Les hybrides du genre Anemone.)} Bull. Intern. Acad. Sci. Cracovie,6, 56, 24–28.Google Scholar
  242. —, 1892. Mięszańce Zawilców. Część III. (Les hybrides du genre Anemone.)} Bull. Intern. Acad. Sci. Cracovie,6, 228–230.Google Scholar
  243. John, C. M., 1935. Inheritance studies inGingelly-Sesamum indicum. Proc. Assoc. Econ. Biol. Coimbatore. (1934),2, 33–40.Google Scholar
  244. Jones, W. N., 1913a. The formation of anthocyanin pigments. V. The chromogenes of white flowers. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,86, 318–323.Google Scholar
  245. —, 1913b. Species hybrids ofDigitalis. Journ. Gen.2, 71–88.Google Scholar
  246. —, 1929. Species hybrids inDigitalis. Journ. Gen.20, 217–218.Google Scholar
  247. Kaelberer, H., 1926. Recherches sur l'hérédité du pigment jaune des fleurs deTropaeolum majus L. Journ. Soc. Bot. Russie11, Nr. 3–4, 309–318.Google Scholar
  248. Kajanus, B., 1912a. Genetische Studien anBrassica. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.6, 217–237.Google Scholar
  249. —, 1912b. Über die Farben der Blüten und Samen vonTrifolium pratense. Fühlings. landw. Ztg.61, 763–776.Google Scholar
  250. —, 1913. Über die Vererbungsweise gewisser Merkmale derBeta- undBrassica-Rüben. II.Brassica. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.1, 419–463.Google Scholar
  251. —, 1914. Über die Vererbung der Blütenfarbe vonLupinus mutabilis Swt. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.12, 57–58.Google Scholar
  252. —, 1917. Über Bastardierungen zwischenBrassica Napus L. undBrassica rapa L. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.5, 265–322.Google Scholar
  253. —, 1919a. Genetische Studien über die Blüten vonPapaver somniferum L. Arkiv Bot. K. Svensk. Vetenskapsakad.15, Nr. 18, 1–87.Google Scholar
  254. -, 1919b. GenetischePapaver-Notizen. Bot. Notis. 99–102.Google Scholar
  255. —, 1923. Genetische Studien anPisum. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.9, 1–22.Google Scholar
  256. — & S. O. Berg, 1919.Pisum-Kreuzungen. Ark. Bot.15, Nr. 19, 1–18.Google Scholar
  257. Kakizaki, Y., 1930. A dominant white-flowered mutant ofBrassica oleracea L. Jap. Journ. Gen.6, 55–60.Google Scholar
  258. Kanna, B., 1926. On the inheritance of balsam. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,40, 599–619.Google Scholar
  259. —, 1929. On a mutable strain ofCelosia cristata L. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,43, 407–413.Google Scholar
  260. —, 1934. Genetic studies inImpatiens Balsamina L. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,12, 421–478.Google Scholar
  261. —, 1934/35. The genetics of some ornamental plants, with special reference to anthocyanin variegation. Jap. Journ. Gen.10, 29–77, 101–114, 175–199.Google Scholar
  262. Kappert, H., 1923. Über ein neues einfach mendelndes Merkmal bei der Erbse. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.41, 43–47.Google Scholar
  263. —, 1924. Erblichkeitsuntersuchungen an weißblühenden Leinsippen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.42, 434–441.Google Scholar
  264. —, 1925a. Über die Zahl der unabhängigen Merkmalsgruppen bei der Erbse. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.36, 1–32.Google Scholar
  265. —, 1925b. Über absolut gekoppelte Faktoren oder multiple Allelomorphe beiPisum. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.43, 582–589.Google Scholar
  266. —, 1929. Die Erblichkeitsverhältnisse der züchterisch wichtigen Eigenschaften der Gartenerbse. Züchter1, 79–86.Google Scholar
  267. —, 1930. Über den Rezessivenausfall in den Kreuzungen gewisser blau- und weißblühender Leinsippen. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.53, 38–66.Google Scholar
  268. —, 1935. Über den Rezessivenausfall in den Kreuzungen gewisser blau- und weißblühender Leinsippen. II. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.70, 73–95.Google Scholar
  269. Kappert, H., 1937. Die Genetik der immerspaltenden Levkojen (Matthiola incana). Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.73, 233–281.Google Scholar
  270. Karpechenko, G. D., 1928. Polyploid hybrids ofRaphanus sativus L. × Brassica oleracea L. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.48, 1–85.Google Scholar
  271. Kearney, T. H., 1923. Segregation and correlation of characters in an Upland-Egyptian cotton hybrid. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bull.1164, 1–57.Google Scholar
  272. —, 1924a. Inheritance of petal spot in Pima cotton. Journ. Agric. Res.27, Nr. 7, 491–512.Google Scholar
  273. —, 1924b. A hybrid between different species of cotton. Journ. Her.15, 309–320.Google Scholar
  274. —, 1930. Genetics of cotton. A survey of our present knowledge. Journ. Her.21, 325–336, 375–384, 409–415.Google Scholar
  275. Keeble, F. & C. Pellew, 1910. White flowered varieties ofPrimula sinensis. Journ. Gen.1, 1–5.Google Scholar
  276. —, — & W. N. Jones, 1910. The inheritance of peloria and flower colour in foxgloves (Digitalis purpurea). New Phytol.9, 68–77.Google Scholar
  277. Kelaney, M. A., 1925. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. IV. A mendelian analysis of certain flower form, flower and filament color and leafbase characters. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot.11, Nr. 2, 31–59.Google Scholar
  278. Kelly, J. P., 1920. A genetical study of flower form and flower color inPhlox Drummondii. Genetics5, 189–248.Google Scholar
  279. —, 1922a.Astylis Phlox. The relation of this variation inPhlox Drummondii to the large-eyed flower. Journ. Her.13, 338–342.Google Scholar
  280. —, 1922b. The synthesis of full coloration inPhlox. Science n. s.55, 245.Google Scholar
  281. —, 1929. The genetics of the genusPhlox. Pennsylv. Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull.243, 13.Google Scholar
  282. Khan, A. R., 1930/31. Report of the imperial economic botanist. Sci. Rept. Imp. Inst. Agric. Res. Pusa, 34–35.Google Scholar
  283. — & A. R. Akhtar, 1934. The inheritance of petal colour in Gram (Cicer arietinum Linn.). Agric. & Live-Stock. India.4, 127–155.Google Scholar
  284. Kiernan, F. P. & O. E. White, 1926. Inheritance in four o'clocks. Journ. Her.17, 383 bis 386.Google Scholar
  285. Kirk, L. E., 1929. Natural crossing between white flowered and yellow flowered sweet clover. Sci. Agric. Ottawa,9, 313–315.Google Scholar
  286. —, 1931. Inheritance of flower colour in a cross between white blossom and yellow blossom sweet clover (Melilotus albus Desr. ×M. officinalis [L.] Desr.). Sci. Agric. Ottawa,11, 265–273.Google Scholar
  287. Klemm, M., 1927. Vergleichend morphologische und entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchung einer Reihe multipler Allelomorphe beiAntirrhinum majus. Diss. Landw. Hochsch. Berlin,52; Bot. Arch.20, 423–474.Google Scholar
  288. Kojima, H., 1930. The inheritance of flower colour in a race ofCelosia cristata L., blooming in mosaic colour. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,44, 328–351.Google Scholar
  289. Kooiman, H. N., 1931. Monograph on the genetics ofPhaseolus. Bibliogr. Gen.8, 295–413.Google Scholar
  290. Kottur, G. L., 1923. Studies in inheritance in cotton. I. History of a cross betweenGossypium herbaceum andGossypium neglectum. Mem. Dept. Agric. India Bot. Ser. 12, Nr. 3, 71–133.Google Scholar
  291. —, B. B. Mundkur & S. S. Maralihalli, 1931. The inheritance of corolla colour in some Indian cottons. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci.1, 577–585.Google Scholar
  292. Krauss, F. G., 1927. Improvement of the pigeon pea. Genetic analysis ofCajanus indicus and the creation of new varieties through hybridization and selection. Journ. Her.18, 227–232.Google Scholar
  293. Kristofferson, K. B., 1922. Studies on mendelian factors inAquilegia rulgaris. Hereditas3, 178–190.Google Scholar
  294. Kristofferson, K. B., 1923. Crossings onMelanium-Violets. Hereditas4, 251–289.Google Scholar
  295. —, 1926. Species crossings inMalva. Hereditas7, 233–354.Google Scholar
  296. Kuckuck, H., 1936. Über vier neue Serien multipler Allele beiAntirrhinum majus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.71, 429–440.Google Scholar
  297. — & R. Schick, 1930. Die Erbfaktoren beiAntirrhinum majus und ihre Bezeichnung. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.56, 51–83.Google Scholar
  298. Kulkarni, R. K. & T. R. Khadilker, 1929. Studies in inheritance in cotton. The improvement ofDharwar American cotton by hybridization. Agric. Res. Inst. Pusa Bull.189, 1–83.Google Scholar
  299. Kutscher, L., 1935. Untersuchungen über Koppelungen beiAntirrhinum majus. V. Koppelungen zwischen Blatt- und Blütengenen. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.68, 454–485.Google Scholar
  300. Lamprecht, H., 1936. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. XII. Über die Vererbung der Blüten- und Stammfarbe. Hereditas21, 129–166.Google Scholar
  301. —, 1937. Zur Genetik vonPhaseolus vulgaris. XIII. Ein neues Grundgen für Testafarben, ein weiteres Testafarbengen sowie etwas über Blütenfarben. Hereditas22, 241–268.Google Scholar
  302. Lathouwers, M. V., 1922. Recherches expérimentales sur l'hérédité chezCampanula medium L. Mém. Acad. Roy. Belg. Brux. II. Sér. Tome IV, fasc. 8, 1–33.Google Scholar
  303. Lawrence, W. J. C., 1929. The genetics and cytology ofDahlia species. Journ. Gen.21, 125–159.Google Scholar
  304. —, 1931a. Mutation and segregation in the octoploidDahlia variabilis. Journ. Gen.24, 307–324.Google Scholar
  305. —, 1931b. The genetics and cytology ofDahlia variabilis. Journ. Gen.24, 257–306.Google Scholar
  306. — & R. Scott-Moncrieff, 1935. The genetics and chemistry of flower colour inDahlia. Journ. Gen.30, 155–226.Google Scholar
  307. Leake, H. M., 1908. Studies in the experimental breeding of the Indian cottons, an introductory note. Asiatic Soc. Bengal, Journ. & Proc. n. s.4, 13–20.Google Scholar
  308. —, 1911a. Experimental studies in Indian cottons. Proc Roy. Soc. Ser. B,83, 447–451.Google Scholar
  309. —, 1911b. Studies in Indian cotton. Journ. Gen.1, 205–272.Google Scholar
  310. — & B. Ram Pershad, 1920. A preliminary note on the flower colour and associated characters of opium poppy. Journ. Gen.10, 1–20.Google Scholar
  311. — & Ram Prasad, 1912. Notes on the incidence and effect of sterility and of crossfertilisation in the Indian cottons. Mem. Dept. Agric. India. Pusa. Bot. Ser.4, Nr. 3, 37–72.Google Scholar
  312. — & —, 1914. Studies in Indian cottons. Part I. The vegetative characters. Mem. Dept. Agric. India. Pusa. Bot. Ser.6, Nr. 4, 115–151.Google Scholar
  313. Lehmann, E., 1914. Über die Bastardierungsuntersuchungen in derVeronica-Gruppeagrestis. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.13, 88–175.Google Scholar
  314. —, 1917. Vererbungsversuche mitVeronica syriaca Roem. et Schultes. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.35, 611–619.Google Scholar
  315. Mc Lendon, C. A., 1912. Mendelian inheritance in cotton hybrids. Georgia Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull.99, 139–228.Google Scholar
  316. Lesley, M. M. & H. B. Frost, 1927. Mendelian inheritance of chromosome shape inMatthiola. Genetics12, 449–460.Google Scholar
  317. Lilienfeld, F. A., 1922. Vererbungsstudien anDianthus barbatus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.-u. Vererbgsl.28, 207–237.Google Scholar
  318. Lock, R. H., 1906. Studies in plant breeding in the tropics. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Peradeniya. III. 95–184.Google Scholar
  319. —, 1908. The present state of knowledge of heredity inPisum. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Peradeniya.4, 3, 93–111.Google Scholar
  320. Lock, R. H., 1909. A preliminary survey of species crosses in the genusNicotiana from the Mendelian standpoint. Ann. Roy. Bot. Gard. Peradeniya.4, 195–227.Google Scholar
  321. Lodewijks, J. A., 1911. Erblichkeitsversuche mit Tabak. II. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst. u. Vererbgsl.5, 285–323.Google Scholar
  322. Lotsy, J. P., 1913. Hybrides entre espèces d'Antirrhinum. IV. Conf. Inter. Génét. Paris (1911), 416–428.Google Scholar
  323. —, 1914. La théorie du croisement. Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Natur. Sér. III. B.2, 178–238.Google Scholar
  324. —, 1916.Antirrhinum rhinanthoides mihi. Arch. Néerl. Sci. Exact. Natur. Sér. III. B.3, 195–204.Google Scholar
  325. Lunden, A. P., 1929. Undersøkelser over nedarvning av faktorer som bestemmer knollfarve, blomsterfarve og stengelfarve hos poteter, samt litt om disse karakterers korrelasjonsforhold. Melding. fra Norges Landbrukshøiskole9, 293–308.Google Scholar
  326. —, 1932. Notes on the inheritance of flower and tuber colour in the potato. Journ. Gen.25, 339–358.Google Scholar
  327. Mahta, D. N. & B. B. Dave, 1931/33. Studies inCajanus indicus. Mem. Dept. Agric. India Bot. Ser.19. Nr. 1, 1–25.Google Scholar
  328. Malinowski, E., 1916. O wystepowanin nowych form w potomstwie mieszańcówNicotiana atropurpurea × Nicotiana silvestris. Spraw. pos. Tow. Nauk. Warszawskiego,9, 827–864.Google Scholar
  329. —, 1928. Variegation and chromosomes inPetunia. Journ. Her.19, 521–526.Google Scholar
  330. — & M. Sachsowa, 1916. O dziedziczeniu barw i ksztaltów kwiatu u Petunii. Spraw. pos. Tow. Nauk. Warszawskiego,9, 865–894.Google Scholar
  331. Mangelsdorf, A. J. & E. M. East, 1927. Studies on the genetics ofFragaria. Genetics12, 307–339.Google Scholar
  332. Marryat, D. C. E., 1909. Hybridisation experiments withMirabilis Jalapa. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London. V, 32–50.Google Scholar
  333. Marsden-Jones, E. M., 1930. The genetics ofGeum intermedium Willd. haud Ehrh. and its back-crosses. Journ. Gen.23, 377–396.Google Scholar
  334. — & W. B. Turrill, 1929. Studies inRanunculus. 1. Preliminary account of petal colour and sex inRanunculus acris andR. bulbosus. Journ. Gen.21, 169–181.Google Scholar
  335. — & —, 1937. Genetical studies inCentaurea scabiosa L. andCentaurea collina L. Journ. Gen.34, 487–495.Google Scholar
  336. Mayer Gmelin, H., 1914. Eerste reeks van onderzoekingen met betrekking tot de Roodeklaververedeling. Mededeel. Rijks Hoogere Land-, Tuin- en Boschbouwschool,7, 149–165.Google Scholar
  337. Matsuura, H., 1933. A bibliographical monograph on plant genetics (Genic Analysis). 1900–1929. Sapporo. (Hokk. Imp. Univ.)Google Scholar
  338. Meckel, J. C., 1935. Genetische Untersuchungen überCentaurea cyanus L. Genetica17, 377–384.Google Scholar
  339. Melchers, G., 1937. Die Wirkung von Genen, tiefen Temperaturen und blühenden Pfropfpartnern auf die Blühreife beiHyoscyamus niger L. Biol. Zbl.57, 568–614.Google Scholar
  340. Mendel, G., 1866. Versuche über Pflanzen-Hybriden. Verh. naturf. Ver. Brünn,4, 1–47.Google Scholar
  341. Meunissier, A., 1918. Expériences génétiques faites à Verrières. (Suite.) Bull. Soc. Nat. Acclim. France, Nr.4, 115–121.Google Scholar
  342. Miyake, K. & Y. Imai, 1920a. On the inheritance of flower color and other characters inDigitalis purpurea. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,6, Nr. 4, 391–402; Bot Mag. Tokyo, 1919,33, 115–186.Google Scholar
  343. — & —, 1920b. Genetic experiments with morning glories. I. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,34. (1)-(26).Google Scholar
  344. — & —, 1921a. Genetic experiments with morning glories. III. Bot. Mag. Tokyo.35. (1)-(9).Google Scholar
  345. Miyake, K. & Y. Imai, 1921b. Genetic experiments with morning glories. III. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,35, (101)-(115).Google Scholar
  346. — & —, 1921c. On the inheritance of flower-colour inSisyrinchium angustifolium. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,35, (261)-(265).Google Scholar
  347. — & —, 1923. Genetic studies in the Opium Poppy (Papaver somniferum L.). I. On the flower color. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,37, (1)-(13).Google Scholar
  348. — & —, 1927a. Inheritance inPapaver somniferum. Proc. Imp. Acad. Tokyo,3, 169–171.Google Scholar
  349. — & —, 1927b. Genetic studies onPapaver somniferum. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,9, 275–332.Google Scholar
  350. — & —, 1927c. On the inheritance of flower color inSisyrinchium angustifolium. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,9, 147–150.Google Scholar
  351. — & —, 1935. A chimerical strain with variegated flowers inChrysanthemum sinense. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.68, 300–302.Google Scholar
  352. —, — & K. Tabuchi, 1926. On the inheritance of Cosmos. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,40, 592–598.Google Scholar
  353. —, — & —, 1927. Genetic experiments with Cosmos. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,9, 139–146.Google Scholar
  354. —, — & —, 1930. Contributions to the genetics ofPhaseolus vulgaris. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,11, 1–20.Google Scholar
  355. Miyazawa, B., 1918. Studies of inheritance in the JapaneseConvolvulus. Journ. Gen.8, 59–82.Google Scholar
  356. —, 1921. Studies of inheritance in the JapaneseConvolvulus. Part III. Journ. Gen.11, 1–15.Google Scholar
  357. Moffet, A. A., 1936. The genetics ofTropaeolum majus. Journ. Gen.33, 151–161.Google Scholar
  358. Müntzing, A. 1930. Outlines to a genetic monograph of the genusGaleopsis. With special reference to the nature of inheritance of partial sterility. Hereditas13, 185–341.Google Scholar
  359. —, 1932. Disturbed segregation ratios inGaleopsis caused by intraspecific sterility. Hereditas16, 73–104.Google Scholar
  360. Nagai, I., 1921. A genetico-physiological study on the formation of anthocyanin and brown pigments in plants. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,8, 1–92.Google Scholar
  361. —, 1923. Notes on the species hybrids in the genus Mosla. Jap. Journ. Bot.1, 93–104.Google Scholar
  362. Neelekantham, J., R. H. Ramachandra Rao & T. R. Seshadri, 1935. Pigments of cotton flowers. Part I. Cambodia (Gossypium hirsutum). Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. I, Sect. A, 887–890.Google Scholar
  363. Negodi, G., 1932. Comportamento del cromatismo dei petali in incroci intraspecifici diPapaver Rhoeas L. e sua interpretazione. Ann. di Bot.19, 510–527.Google Scholar
  364. Newton, W. C. F., 1929. The inheritance of flower colour inPapaver Rhoeas and related forms. Journ. Gen.21, 389–404.Google Scholar
  365. — & C. Pellew, 1929.Primula Kewensis and its derivatives. Journ. Gen.20, 405–467.Google Scholar
  366. Nijdam, F. E., 1932. Kruisingen metTrifolium pratense L. Genetica14, 161–278.Google Scholar
  367. Nilsson, E., 1929. Eine monohybride Spaltung beiTetragonolobus. Hereditas12, 320–322.Google Scholar
  368. Nohara, S., 1915. Genetical studies anOxalis. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,6, 165–182.Google Scholar
  369. —, 1932. Genetic studies inPlatycodon. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,46, 192–201.Google Scholar
  370. —, 1933. Genetical studies inSesamum indicum L. Journ. Coll. Agric. Tokyo,12, 227–386.Google Scholar
  371. Onslow, M. W., 1925. The anthocyanin pigments of plants. 2nd edit. Cambridge (Univ. Press).Google Scholar
  372. —, 1931. Chemical effect of a mendelian factor for flower colour. Nature128, 373–374.Google Scholar
  373. —, 1932. Genetical and biochemical aspects of anthocyanin pigments. Nature129, 601–604.Google Scholar
  374. Oppenheimer, H. Ch., 1932. Neuere Daten zur Genetik der Pflanze. Tabulae Biolog. Period. v. C. Oppenheimer & C. Pincussen. Bd. II, Nr. 4, 201–238.Google Scholar
  375. Ostenfeld, C. H., 1923. Genetic studies inPolemonium coeruleum. (A preliminary report.) Hereditas4, 17–26.Google Scholar
  376. Owen, F. V., 1928. Inheritance studies in soybeans. III. Secdcoat colour and summary of all other Mendelian characters thus far reported. Genetics13, 50–79.Google Scholar
  377. Patel, S. J., 1933. The F1 generation of a hybrid between an American and an Asiatic cotton. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci.3, 127–130.Google Scholar
  378. Pearson, O. H., 1929. A dominant white flower colour inBrassica oleracea L. Amer. Nat.63, 561–565.Google Scholar
  379. Pellew, C., 1919. The genetics ofCampanula carpatica. Gard. Chron.66, 238.Google Scholar
  380. — & F. M. Durham, 1916. The genetic behaviour of the hybrid ofPrimula kewensis, and its allies. Journ. Gen.5, 159–182.Google Scholar
  381. Perkin, A. G., 1899/1909/1916. The colouring matter of cotton flowers. I. II. III. Journ. Chem. Soc. Trans.75, 825–829;95, 2181;109, 145–154.Google Scholar
  382. Philp, J., 1934a. The genetics ofPapaver commutatum and its hybrids withPapaver Rhoeas. Journ. Gen.28. 169–174.Google Scholar
  383. —, 1934b. The genetics ofPapaver Rhoeas and related forms. Journ. Gen.28, 175–203.Google Scholar
  384. Piper, C. V. & W. J. Morse, 1910. The soy bean: history, varieties and field studies. U.S. Dept. Agric. Bur. Plant Ind. Bull.197, 1–84.Google Scholar
  385. Prakken, R., 1934. Inheritance of colours and pod character inPhaseolus vulgaris. Genetica16, 177–296.Google Scholar
  386. Prywer, C., 1932. Genetische Studien über die Bastarde zwischenGeum urbanum L. undGeum rivale L. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniac9, 87–114.Google Scholar
  387. Przyborowski, J. v., 1922. Genetische Studien überPapaver somniferum L. I. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.8, 211–236.Google Scholar
  388. Punnett, R. C., 1913. Reduplication series in sweet peas. Journ. Gen.3, 77–103.Google Scholar
  389. —, 1922. On a case of patching in the flower colour of the sweet pea (Lathyrus odoratus). Journ. Gen.12, 255–281.Google Scholar
  390. -, 1923a. Note on the genetics of the African Marigold (Tagetes erectus). Studia Mendeliana, 187–191.Google Scholar
  391. —, 1923b. Linkage in sweet pea (Lathyrus odoratus). Journ. Gen.13, 101–123.Google Scholar
  392. —, 1925.Lathyrus odoratus. Bibliogr. Gen.1, 69–82.Google Scholar
  393. —, 1928. Linkage groups and chromosome number inLathyrus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,102, 236–238.Google Scholar
  394. —, 1932. Further studies of linkage in the sweet pea. Journ. Gen.26, 97–112.Google Scholar
  395. —, 1936. The flaked Sweet Pea. Journ. Gen.32, 171–177.Google Scholar
  396. Ranke, M., 1930. Faktorenkoppelung und Faktorenanalyse beiAntirrhinum majus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.53, 235–278.Google Scholar
  397. Rant, A., 1922. Einige Beobachtungen mitClitoria ternata L. Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenz.4, 241–246.Google Scholar
  398. Rasmuson, H., 1915. Zur Vererbung der Blütenfarben bei der Balsamine. Bot. Notis. 79–83.Google Scholar
  399. -, 1916. Zur Vererbung der Blütenfarben beiMalope trifida. Bot. Notis. 237–240.Google Scholar
  400. -, 1918a. Zur Genetik der Blütenfarben vonTropaeolum majus. Bot. Notis. 253–259.Google Scholar
  401. -, 1918b. Über einePetunia-Kreuzung. Bot. Notis. 287–294.Google Scholar
  402. —, 1919. Genetische Untersuchungen in der GattungGodetia. (Vorläuf. Mitt.) Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.37, 399–403.Google Scholar
  403. —, 1920a. Über einige genetische Versuche mitPapaver Rhoeas undPapaver laevigatum. Hereditas1, 107–115.Google Scholar
  404. —, 1920b. On some hybridisation experiments with varieties ofCollinisia species. Hereditas1, 178–185.Google Scholar
  405. —, 1920c. Die Hauptergebnisse von einigen genetischen Untersuchungen von verschiedenen Formen vonTropaeolum, Clarkia undImpatiens. (Vorläuf. Mitt.) Hereditas1, 270 bis 276.Google Scholar
  406. Rasmuson, H., 1921. Beiträge zu einer genetischen Analyse zweierGodetia-Arten und ihrer Bastarde. Hereditas2, 143–289.Google Scholar
  407. Rathlef, H. v., 1928. Vererbungsstudien an der Edelrose. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.13, 9–47.Google Scholar
  408. —, 1934. Über einige Kreuzungen Peruanischer Sorten vonSolanum Andigenum Juz. et Buk. mit Richters Jubel und die Genetik von Schalenfarbe, Knollenfarbe, Fleischfarbe, Blütenfarbe und Knollenform bei der Kartoffel. Unter der Mitarbeit von H. Siebeneick. Genetica26, 153–176.Google Scholar
  409. Raum, J., 1921. Weißblühender Rotklee eine „umschlagende Sippe“? Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.8, 73–77.Google Scholar
  410. Richardson, C. W., 1914. A preliminary note on the genetics ofFragaria. Journ. Gen.3, 171–177.Google Scholar
  411. —, 1918. A further note on the genetics ofFragaria. Journ. Gen.7, 167–170.Google Scholar
  412. —, 1920. Some notes onFragaria. Journ. Gen.10, 39–46.Google Scholar
  413. Roemer, Th., 1924. Vererbungsstudien mit Lupinen. I. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.9, 271–318.Google Scholar
  414. Rosén, D., 1915. Några korsningsförsök överAnemone Hepatica L. Bot. Notis. 33–34.Google Scholar
  415. -, 1916. KreuzungsversucheGeum urbanum L. ♀ ×rivale L. ♂. Bot. Notis. 163–172.Google Scholar
  416. —, 1924. Quelques remarques sur la couleur des sépales chez l'Anemone hepatica L. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris,178, 648–649.Google Scholar
  417. Rosenberg, V., 1924. Unregelmäßigkeiten und andere Beobachtungen bei Erbsenbastardierungen. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.10, 59–63.Google Scholar
  418. Sachs-Skaliáska, M., 1921a. Wielopostaciowasć w linjach czystych Petunii. Pam. Zakladu Genet. Szkoly Glownej Gospod. Wiejskiego,1, 15–33.Google Scholar
  419. —, 1921b. Krzyźowanie ras wielopostaciowych. Pam. Zakladu Genet. Szkoly Glownej Gospod, Wiejskiego,1, 34–46.Google Scholar
  420. —, 1921c. Bandania nad mieszańcami Tytunia. Pam. Zakladu Genet. Szkoly Glownej Gospod. Wiejskiego,1, 47–122.Google Scholar
  421. Salaman, R. N., 1910a. The inheritance of colour and other characters in the potato. Journ. Gen.1, 7–46.Google Scholar
  422. —, 1910b. Male sterility in potatoes, a dominant Mendelian character; with remarks on the shape of the pollen in wild and domestic varieties. Journ. Linn. Soc.39, 301–312.Google Scholar
  423. -, 1911. Studies in potato breeding. IV. Conf. Intern. Génét. Paris, 373–376.Google Scholar
  424. —, 1912. A lecture on the hereditary characters on the potato. Journ. Roy. Hort. Soc.38, 34–39.Google Scholar
  425. —, 1926. Potato varieties. Cambridge (Univ. Press).Google Scholar
  426. —, 1929. Genetic studies in potatoes: abnormal segregation in families arising from the crossS. utile × S. tuberosum. Journ. Gen.20, 311–343.Google Scholar
  427. Saunders, E. R., 1906. Certain complications arising in the cross-breeding of stocks. Rept. III. Conf. Genet. Roy. Hort. Soc. London, 143–147.Google Scholar
  428. —, 1911a. Further experiments on the inheritance of ’Doubleness‘ and other characters in stocks. Journ. Gen.1, 303–376.Google Scholar
  429. —, 1911b. On the inheritance of a mutation in the common foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). New Phytol.10, 47–63.Google Scholar
  430. —, 1912a. On the relation ofLinaria alpina type to its varieties concolor and rosea. New Phytol.11, 167–169.Google Scholar
  431. —, 1912b. Further contribution to the study of the inheritance of hoariness in stocks (Matthiola). Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,85, 540–545.Google Scholar
  432. —, 1913. On the mode of inheritance of certain characters in double-throwing stocks. A reply. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.10, 297–310.Google Scholar
  433. —, 1924. Further studies of inheritance inMatthiola incana. I. Sap colour and surface character. Journ. Gen.14, 101–114.Google Scholar
  434. Saunders, E. R., 1927. A study ofAntirrhinum Orontium. Hereditas9, 17–24.Google Scholar
  435. —, 1928a.Matthiola. Bibliogr. Gen.4, 141–170.Google Scholar
  436. —, 1928b. Further studies on inheritance inMatthiola incana. II. Plastid colour and doubling. Journ. Gen.20, 53–77.Google Scholar
  437. Schick, R. & H. Stubbe, 1932. Die Gene vonAntirrhinum majus. II. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.62, 249–290.Google Scholar
  438. — & —, 1934. Die Gene vonAntirrhinum majus. III. (Zugleich ein Beitrag zur genetischen Nomenklatur.) Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.66, 425–462.Google Scholar
  439. Scott-Moncrieff, R., 1930. The magenta flower pigment ofAntirrhinum majus. Biochem. Journ.24, Nr. 3, 753–766.Google Scholar
  440. —, 1931. The chemical effect of a Mendelian factor for flower colour. Nature127, 974–975.Google Scholar
  441. —, 1932. A note on the anthocyanin pigments of the PrimroseP. acaulis. Journ. Gen.25, 206–210.Google Scholar
  442. —, 1936. A biochemical survey of some Mendelian factors for flower colour. Journ. Gen.32, 117–170.Google Scholar
  443. Searle, G. O., 1926. A botanical study of the flax plant. — VII. A preliminary account of the genetics of flower colour and other related characters. Linen Ind. Res. Assoc., Res. Int. Mem.35, 115–134.Google Scholar
  444. Setchell, W. A., T. H. Goodspeed & R. E. Clausen, 1921. A preliminary note on the results of crossing certain varieties ofNicotiana tabacum. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.7, 50–56.Google Scholar
  445. —, — & —, 1922. Inheritance inNicotiana tabacum. I. A report on the results of crossing certain varieties. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. V, Nr. 17, 457–582.Google Scholar
  446. Shaw, F. J. F., 1936. Studies in Indian pulses. The inheritance of morphological characters and of wilt-resistance in Rahar (Cajanus indicus Spreng.). Indian Journ. Agric. Sci. Delhi,6, 139–187.Google Scholar
  447. —, A. R. Khan & Mahbub Alam, 1931. Studies in Indian oilseeds. V. The inheritance of characters in Indian Linseed. Indian Journ. Agric. Sci. Delhi,1, 1–57.Google Scholar
  448. Shaw, J. K., 1913. The inheritance of blossom color in beans. Massachusetts Agric. Exper. Stat. 25th Ann. Rep. 182–203.Google Scholar
  449. Showalter, H. M., 1934. Self flower-color inheritance and mutation inMirabilis Jalapa L. Genetics19, 568–580.Google Scholar
  450. Shull, G. H., 1908. Some new cases of Mendelian inheritance. Bot. Gaz.45, 103–116.Google Scholar
  451. —, 1910. Color inheritance inLychnis dioica L. Amer. Nat.44, 83–91.Google Scholar
  452. —, 1912. The primary color-factors ofLychnis and color-inhibitors ofPapaver Rhoeas. Bot. Gaz.54, 120–135.Google Scholar
  453. —, 1921. Three new mutations inOenothera Lamarckiana. Journ. Her.12, 354–363.Google Scholar
  454. —, 1923a. Linkage with lethal factors the solution of theOenothera problem. Eugenics, Genetics & the Family1, 86–99.Google Scholar
  455. —, 1923b. Further evidence of linkage with crossing over inOenothera. Genetics8, 154–167.Google Scholar
  456. —, 1925. The third linkage group inOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.11, 715–718.Google Scholar
  457. —, 1926. ’Old-Gold‘ flower color, the second case of indepedent inheritance inOenothera. Genetics11, 201–234.Google Scholar
  458. —, 1927a. Crossing over in the third linkage group inOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.13, 21–24.Google Scholar
  459. —, 1927b. Linkage with crossing over between rubricalyx buds and oldgold flower color inOenothera. Anat. Rec.37, 179.Google Scholar
  460. —, 1928a. The Outside-In‘Oenothera flower, a new morphological type, produced by the interaction of two recessive Mendelian factors. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.14, 142 bis 146.Google Scholar
  461. Shull, G. H., 1928b. Linkage with crossing-over between rubricalyx buds and old-gold flower color inOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.14, 147–149.Google Scholar
  462. —, 1930. The first two cases of crossing-over between old-gold and bullata factors in the third linkage group ofOenothera. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.16, 106–109.Google Scholar
  463. Sinskaia, E. N., 1927. Geno-systematical investigation of cultivatedBrassicas. Bull. Appl. Bot. & Plant Breed.17, 1, 3–166.Google Scholar
  464. Sirks, M. J., 1924. Die gynanthere Form des Goldlacks und ihre Vererbung. Genetica6, 537–548.Google Scholar
  465. —, 1926a. Mendelian factors inDatura. II. Certation. Genetica8, 485–500.Google Scholar
  466. —, 1926b. Mendelian factors inDatura. II. The bronze factor. Genetica8, 518–524.Google Scholar
  467. —, 1931a. Beiträge zu einer genotypischen Analyse der Ackerbohne,Vicia Faba L. Genetica13, 209–631.Google Scholar
  468. —, 1931b. Plasmatic influences upon the inheritance inVicia Faba. I. The elimination of a whole linkage-group in the plasm ofVicia Faba minor. Proc. Kon. Akad. Wet. Amst. Afd. Naturk.34, 1057–1062.Google Scholar
  469. Skalińska, M., 1924. Zagadnienie atrzymywania nowych odmian draga selekcji pedow swietle dos wiadczen nad rasa wielopolaciowaPetunia violaceae. Pam. Zakladu Gen. Szkoly Glownej Gospod. Wiejskiego,2, 69–121.Google Scholar
  470. —, 1928. Sur les causes d'une disjonction nontypique des hybrides du genreAquilegia. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae5, 141–173.Google Scholar
  471. Smith, H. H., 1937. Inheritance of corolla color in the crossNicotiana Langsdorffii byN. Sanderae. Genetics22, 347–360.Google Scholar
  472. Spillmann, W. J., 1913. Color correlation in cowpeas. Science n. s.38, 302.Google Scholar
  473. Stone, L. H. A., 1932. A somatic variation in the sweet pea. Journ. Gen.26, 113–114.Google Scholar
  474. Sturtevant, A. H., 1931. Genetic and cytological studies onOenothera. 1.Nobska, Oakesiana, Ostreae, Shulliana, and the inheritance of old-gold flower-color. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.59, 365–380.Google Scholar
  475. Suessenguth, K., 1936. Über den Farbwechsel von Blüten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.54, 7, 409–417.Google Scholar
  476. Sverdrup, A., 1927. Linkage and independent inheritance inPisum sativum. Journ. Gen.17, 221–251.Google Scholar
  477. Sverdrup-Sömme, A., 1930. Genetics and cytology of the tetraploid form ofPrimula sinensis. Journ. Gen.23, 447–509.Google Scholar
  478. Sylvén, N., 1926. Einige Spaltungszahlen bei Kreuzungen zwischen blau- und weißblühenden Varietäten vonLinum usitatissimum. Hereditas7, 75–101.Google Scholar
  479. —, 1927. Kreuzungsstudien beim Raps (Brassica Napus oleifera). I. Blütenfarben. Hereditas9, 380–390.Google Scholar
  480. -, 1929.Melilotus albus Desr. ×officinalis (L.) Desr. funnen i Sverige. Botan. Notis. 302–304.Google Scholar
  481. Sypniewski, J., 1925. O odmianach i rasachLupinus angustifolius L. Pamietnik pantowego inst. nauk. gospod. wieskiego w z Pulawach,6, 220–252.Google Scholar
  482. Takagi, F., 1929. On the inheritance of some characters in GlycineSoja, Bentham (Soybean). Sci. Rept. Tôhoku Imp. Univ.4. Ser., Biol.4, 577–589.Google Scholar
  483. Takahashi, Y. & J. Fukuyama, 1919. Morphological and genetic studies on the Soy Beans. Hokkaido Agric. Exper. Stat. Rept.10, 100.Google Scholar
  484. Tammes, T., 1911. Das Verhalten fluktuierend variierender Merkmale bei der Bastardierung. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. 201–288.Google Scholar
  485. —, 1914a. Eine Erklärung einer scheinbaren Ausnahme der Mendelschen Spaltungsregel. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.11, 54–69.Google Scholar
  486. Tammes, T., 1914b. The explanation of an apparent exception to Mendel's Law of segregation. Proc. Sci. K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam,16, 1021–1031.Google Scholar
  487. —, 1915. Die genotypische Zusammensetzung einiger Varietäten derselben Art und ihr genetischer Zusammenhang. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl.12, 217–277.Google Scholar
  488. —, 1916a. Die gegenseitige Wirkung genotypischer Faktoren. Rec. Trav. Bot. Néerl. Groningen,13, 44–62.Google Scholar
  489. —, 1916b. On the mutual effect of genotypic factors. Proc. Sci. K. Akad. Wet. Amsterdam,18, 1056–1067.Google Scholar
  490. —, 1922. Genetic analysis, schemes of co-operation and multiple allelomorphs ofLinum usitatissimum. Journ. Gen.12, 19–46.Google Scholar
  491. —, 1923. Das genotypische Verhältnis zwischen dem wildenLinum angustifolium und dem Kulturlein,Linum usitatissimum. Genetica5, 61–76.Google Scholar
  492. —, 1926. Dominanzwechsel beiDianthus barbatus. Genetica8, 513–517.Google Scholar
  493. —, 1928. The genetics of the genusLinum. Bibliogr. Gen.4, 1–36.Google Scholar
  494. —, 1930. Die Genetik des Leins. Züchter2, 245–257.Google Scholar
  495. Tedin, H., 1920. The inheritance of flower colour inPisum. Hereditas1, 68–97.Google Scholar
  496. Tedin, H. & O., 1926. Contributions to the genetics ofPisum. 4. Hereditas7, 102–108.Google Scholar
  497. Tedin, H. & O. & S. J. Wellensiek, 1925. Note on the symbolisation of flower-colour factors inPisum. Genetica7, 533–535.Google Scholar
  498. Thoday, M. G. & D. Thoday, 1912. On the inheritance of the yellow tinge in sweet pea colouring. Proc. Cambr. Phil. Soc.16, 71–84.Google Scholar
  499. Tjebbes, K., 1929. Species crosses in the genusLinaria Hill. Beretning om det 18. skand. Naturforskermøde. København, 529–534.Google Scholar
  500. — & H. N. Kooiman, 1921. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. IV. Over den strepingsfaktor. Een geval van volkomen afstooting tusschen twee factoren. V. Analyse eener spontane kruising van de stok-kievitsboon. Genetica3, 28–49.Google Scholar
  501. — & —, 1922a. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. VI. Vervolg van de proeven met kievitsboonen. Genetica4, 62–63.Google Scholar
  502. — & —, 1922b. Erfelijkheidsonderzoekingen bij boonen. VII. Bloemkleur en zaadhuidkleur. Genetica4, 447–453.Google Scholar
  503. Toxopeus, H. J., 1927. Erblichkeitsuntersuchungen anNigella Damascena L. Genetica9, 341–442.Google Scholar
  504. Trouard-Riolle, 1916. Hybridation entre une crucifére sauvage et une crucifère cultivée à racine tubérisée. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris,162, 511–513.Google Scholar
  505. Trow, A. H., 1912. On the inheritance of certain characters in the common groundsel —Senecio vulgaris Linn. — and its segregates. Journ. Gen.2, 239–276.Google Scholar
  506. Tschermak, E. v., 1901a. Weitere Beiträge zur Verschiedenwerthigkeit der Merkmale bei Kreuzung von Erbsen und Bohnen. Vorläufige Mittheilung. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.19, 35–51.Google Scholar
  507. —, 1901b. Weitere Beiträge über Verschiedenwerthigkeit der Merkmale bei Kreuzung von Erbsen und Bohnen. Zeitschr. Landw. Vers.wes. Österr.,4, 641–731.Google Scholar
  508. —, 1902a. Über die gesetzmäßige Gestaltungsweise der Mischlinge. (Fortgesetzte Studien an Erbsen und Bohnen.) Zeitschr. Landw. Vers.wes. Österr.,5, 781–861.Google Scholar
  509. —, 1902b. Der gegenwärtige Stand der Mendel'schen Lehre und die Arbeiten von W. Bateson. Zeitschr. Landw. Vers.wes. Österr.,5, 1365–1392.Google Scholar
  510. —, 1902c. Über Korrelation zwischen vegetativen und sexuellen Merkmalen an Erbsenmischlingen. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.20, 17–21.Google Scholar
  511. —, 1904a. Weitere Kreuzungsstudien an Erbsen, Levkojen und Bohnen. Zeitschr. Landw. Vers.wes. Österr.,7, 533–638.Google Scholar
  512. Tschermak, E. v., 1904b. Die Theorie der Kryptomerie und des Kryptohybridismus. 1. Mitt. Beih. Bot. Zbl.16, 1, 11–35.Google Scholar
  513. —, 1912. Bastardierungsversuche an Levkojen, Erbsen und Bohnen mit Rücksicht auf die Faktorenlehre. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.7, 81–234.Google Scholar
  514. —, 1916. Über den gegenwärtigen Stand der Gemüsezüchtung. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.4, 65–104.Google Scholar
  515. —, 1928. Einige Bastardierungsergebnisse an Linsen und Ackerbohnen. Sitz.ber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, mat.-naturw. Kl. 1,137, 171–181.Google Scholar
  516. Ubisch, G. v., 1925. Genetisch-physiologische Analyse der Heterostylie. Bibliogr. Gen.2, 287–342.Google Scholar
  517. —, 1926. Koppelung von Farbe und Heterostylie beiOxalis rosea. Biol. Zbl.46, 633–645.Google Scholar
  518. Uphof, J. C. Th., 1922. Die Farbenfaktoren vonEschscholtzia mexicana Greene. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.27, 227–229.Google Scholar
  519. Vargas Eyre, J. & G. Smith, 1916. Some notes on theLinaceae. The cross pollination of Flax. Journ. Gen.5, 189–197.Google Scholar
  520. Vestergaard, H. A. B., 1919. Iagttagalser vedrørende Arvelighedsforhold hos Lupin, Hvede og Byg. Tidsskr. Planteavl26, 491–510.Google Scholar
  521. —, 1922. Beobachtungen vom Zuchtgarten. Zeitschr. Pfl.-Züchtg.8, 192–195.Google Scholar
  522. Vries, H. de, 1900. Das Spaltungsgesetz der Bastarde. Vorl. Mitt. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges.18, 83–91.Google Scholar
  523. -, 1901/03. Die Mutationstheorie. I und II. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  524. —, 1905. Species and varieties. Their origin by mutation. Chicago & London.—Arten und Varietäten und ihre Entstehung durch Mutation. Deutsch v. H. Klebahn. Berlin 1906.Google Scholar
  525. Waldron, L. R., 1925. An alfalfa bud mutation. A white-flowered alfalfa branch found upon a lavender-flowered plant. Journ. Her.16, 423–424.Google Scholar
  526. —, 1929. Vererbung der Pflanzenfarbe in Hybriden vonMedicago sativa undMedicago falcata. Pflanzenbau6, 157–166.Google Scholar
  527. Ware, J. O., 1927. The inheritance of red plant color in cotton. Univ. Ark. Coll. Agric. Exper. Stat. Bull.220, 1–80.Google Scholar
  528. Warren, E., 1915. A preliminary report on some breeding experiments with foxgloves. Biometrika11, 4, 303–327.Google Scholar
  529. —, 1924. On an interspecific hybrid ofDigitalis. Biometrika16, 205–238.Google Scholar
  530. Weiss, F. E., 1910a. Colour inheritance inAnagallis arvensis L. Rept. Brit. Assoc. Sheffield, 779–781.Google Scholar
  531. —, 1910b. Note on the variability of the colour of the flowers of aTropaeolum hybrid. Mem. Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Manchester,54, 18, 1–6.Google Scholar
  532. —, 1912. Researches on heredity in plants. Mem. & Proc. Lit. Phil. Soc. Manchester,56, 1–12.Google Scholar
  533. — & D. Rosén, 1924. The supposed constancy of the hybrid between the common and the water Avens,Geum urbanum × rivale. Nature114, 500.Google Scholar
  534. Wellensiek, S. J., 1925a.Pisum crosses. I. Genetica7, 1–64.Google Scholar
  535. —, 1925b.Pisum crosses. II. Genetica7, 337–364.Google Scholar
  536. —, 1925c. Genetic monograph onPisum. Bibliogr. Gen.2, 343–476.Google Scholar
  537. Westgate, V. V., 1911. Color inheritance in the petunia. Amer. Breed. Assoc.6, 459–462.Google Scholar
  538. Wexelsen, H., 1932. Segregation in Red Clover (Trifolium pratense L.). Hereditas16, 219–240.Google Scholar
  539. Wheldale, M., 1907. The inheritance of flower colour inAntirrhinum majus. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,79, 288–305. Ref. E. Baur, 1908, Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.1, 137.Google Scholar
  540. Wheldale, M., 1909a. Note on the physiological interpretation of the Mendelian factors for colour in plants. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London,5, 26–31.Google Scholar
  541. —, 1909b. Further observations upon the inheritance of flower-colour inAntirrhinum majus. Repts. Evol. Comm. Roy. Soc. London,5, 1–26.Google Scholar
  542. —, 1909c. The colours and pigments of flowers with special reference to genetics. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,81, 44–60.Google Scholar
  543. —, 1910a. Die Vererbung der Blütenfarbe beiAntirrhinum majus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.3, 321–333.Google Scholar
  544. —, 1910b. Plant oxydases and the chemical inter-relationships of colour varieties. Progr. Rei Bot.3, 457–473.Google Scholar
  545. —, 1913. The flower pigments ofAntirrhinum majus. I. Method of preparation. Biochem. Journ.7, 87–91.Google Scholar
  546. —, 1915a. Our present knowledge of the chemistry of the Mendelian factors for flower-colour. Journ. Gen.4, 109–129.Google Scholar
  547. —, 1915b. Our present knowledge of the chemistry of the Mendelian factors for flower-colour. Part II. Journ. Gen.4, 369–376.Google Scholar
  548. - 1916. The anthocyanin pigments of plants. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  549. — & H. L. Bassett, 1913. The flower pigments ofAntirrhinum majus. II. The pale yellow or ivory pigment. Biochem. Journ.7, 441–444.Google Scholar
  550. — & —, 1914a. The chemical interpretation of some Mendelian factors for flower-colour. Proc. Roy. Soc. Ser. B,87, 300–311.Google Scholar
  551. — & —, 1914b. The flower pigments ofAntirrhinum majus. III. The red and magenta pigments. Biochem. Journ.8, 2, 204–208.Google Scholar
  552. White, O. E., 1917a. Inheritance studies inPisum. IV. Interrelation of genetic factors inPisum. Journ. Agric. Res.11, 167–190.Google Scholar
  553. —, 1917b. Studies of inheritance inPisum. II. The present state of knowledge of heredity and variation in peas. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc.56, 487–588.Google Scholar
  554. Wichler, G., 1913. Untersuchungen über den BastardDianthus Armeria × Dianthus deltoides nebst Bemerkungen über einige andere Kreuzungen der GattungDianthus. Zeitschr. f. ind. Abst.- u. Vererbgsl.10, 177–232.Google Scholar
  555. Williams, R. D., 1935. Genetics of flower colour inTrifolium pratense L. I. Basic white colour. Journ. Gen.31, 431–450.Google Scholar
  556. Wilson, J. H., 1906. Interfertile Hybrids. Rept. III. Intern. Conf. Gen. Roy. Hort. Soc. 183–209.Google Scholar
  557. Winton, D. de & J. B. S. Haldane, 1933. The genetics ofPrimula sinensis. II. Segregation and interaction of factors in the diploid. Journ. Gen.27, 1–44.Google Scholar
  558. Witte, H., 1921a. Luzernförädling, dess möjligheter och uppgifter i vårt land samt några iakttagelser öfver olika egenskapers förhållande hos bastarden emellan blåluzern (Medicago sativa) och gulluzern (M. falcata). Sveriges Utsädesförenings Tidskr.31, 185–200.Google Scholar
  559. —, 1921b. Några iakttagelser öfver fröfärgen hos rödklöfvern och des ärftlighetsförhållanden. Sveriges Utsädesfor. Tidskr.31, 257–265.Google Scholar
  560. Woodworth, C. M., 1923. Inheritance of growth habit, pod color, and flower color in soybeans. Journ. Amer. Soc. Agron.15, 481–494.Google Scholar
  561. Yamaguti, Y., 1935. On the C-group of multiple allelomorphs for the flower colour inPortulaca grandiflora. Jap. Journ. Gen.11, 109–112.Google Scholar
  562. Yasui, K., 1920. Genetical studies inPortulaca grandiflora. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,34, 55–65.Google Scholar
  563. —, 1927. Further studies on genetics and cytology of artificially raised interspecific hybrids ofPapaver. Bot. Mag. Tokyo,41, 235–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Verlag von Gebrüder Borntraeger 1938

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerhard Benl
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanischen Staatsanstalten München-NymphenburgGermany

Personalised recommendations