, Volume 4, Supplement 7, pp 87–95 | Cite as

The impact of development on interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan: A comparison of two areas of Kenyah dayak settlement

  • K. Kartawinata
  • H. Soedjito
  • T. Jessup
  • A. P. Vayda
  • C. J. P. Colfer


The approach advocated and used in this study has produced some findings which are important for development planning in East Kalimantan and which may be relevant to other tropical forest areas. In the Apo Kayan, contrary to the popular image of shifting cultivators that is prevalent among government officials in East Kalimantan, the Dayak people are not reckless destroyers of the forest. Rather, they maintain and re-use sites, farming almost entirely in secondary forest with a long history of land use. Their migrations are not, in most instances, caused by a shortage of land but are mainly responses to economic problems brought about by their geographic isolation.

The Telen River lowland area is quite different. Despite the hopes of government planners that ‘resettled’ shifting cultivators could be induced to use more intensive agricultural methods, shifting cultivation there is more, not less, extensive than in the Apo Kayan, and it is being practiced mainly in primary rather than secondary forest. This is not due to any ‘backwardness’ on the part of Dayak farmers but is a result of inappropriate methods, such as irrigated rice cultivation, being promoted by extension workers and of economic circumstances that, on the one hand, encourage extensive agricultural production (access to markets) and, on the other, make the clearing of large areas of primary forest relatively easy because of the ready availability of chain-saws, outboard motors, and fuel. A related factor is the low inherent fertility of soils in the area which precludes intensive sedentary agriculture.

It is concluded that development planners should pay close attention to circumstances which may vary from one locality to another and which can have important influences on people's actual behaviour. Such circumstances are usually more important than generalities such as the ‘type’ of agriculture practiced or a group's ‘level of development’ or ‘culture’. The generalization that ‘shifting cultivation is destructive and therefore should be eliminated’ (or the reverse, that shifting cultivation is not destructive) is bound to be wrong some of the time because ‘shifting cultivation’ includes a great variety of actual practices, and these occur in a diversity of environments and under many different specific circumstances. Development plans that recognize this diversity and take account of local needs and circumstances will, we believe, be more successful both in benefitting people and in protecting their environment.


Secondary Forest Primary Forest Rice Cultivation Geographic Isolation Economic Circumstance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Colfer, C. J. P. (1981) Women, men and time in the forests of East Kalimantan,Borneo Research Bulletin, 13, pp. 75–85.Google Scholar
  2. Colfer, C. J. P. (1982) Kenyah Dayak tree cutting in context. Unpublished Final Report for IBPF.Google Scholar
  3. Colfer, C. J. P. (1983a) Change and indigenous agroforestry in East Kalimantan,Borneo Research Bulletin, 15(1), pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
  4. Colfer, C. J. P. (1983b) On circular migration ... from the distaff side: Women left behind in the forests of East Kalimantan. (In preparation forLabour Circulation, G. Standing (ed.) International Labour Organization, Geneva; Published as a Population and Labour Policies Programme Working Paper No. 132, ILO, Geneva.)Google Scholar
  5. Colfer, C. J. P., Soedjito, H. and Azier, A. (1980) On resetlement from the bottom up.Paper presented at the Lokakarya Nasional Respen (National Workshop on Population Resettlement), Samarinda, Indonesia, April, 1980.Google Scholar
  6. Daroesman, R. (1979) An economic survey of East Kalimantan,Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 15, pp. 43–82.Google Scholar
  7. Fearnside, P. M. (1981) Burn quality prediction for simulation of the agricultural system of Brazil's Transamazon Highway colonists for estimating human carrying capacity.Paper presented at the International Society for Tropical Ecology Symposium on Ecology and Resource Management in the Tropics, Bhopal, India, October 5–10, 1981.Google Scholar
  8. Jessup, T. C. (1981) Why do Apo Kayan shifting cultivators move?Borneo Research Bulletin, 13, pp. 16–32.Google Scholar
  9. Jessup, T. C. (1983) Interactions between people and forest in Apo Kayan. Unpublished Final Report for IBPF.Google Scholar
  10. Kartawinata, K. and Vayda, A. P. (1983) Forest conversion in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: the activities and impacts of timber companies, shifting cultivators, migrant pepper farmers, and others. In F. di Castra, F. W. G. Baker and M. Hadley (eds.),Ecology in Practice, Vol. 1, Tycooly, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 89–117.Google Scholar
  11. Kartawinata, K. Vayda, A. P. and Wirakusumah, R. S. (1978) East Kalimantan and the Man and the Biosphere Program,Borneo Research Bulletin, 10, pp. 28–40.Google Scholar
  12. Kartawinata, K., Adisoemarto, S., Riswan, S. and Vayda, A. P. (1981) The impact of man on a tropical forest in Indonesia,Ambio, 10 (2/3), pp. 115–119.Google Scholar
  13. Peluso, M. L. (1981) The trade in forest products in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Unpublished Final Report for IBPF.Google Scholar
  14. Peluso, M. L. (1983) Markets and merchants: the forest products trade of East Kalimantan in historical perspective,M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  15. Roemantyo, H. M. (1982) Use of wild plants by the people of Long Sungai Barang in the Apo Kayan. Unpublished Final Report for IBPF.Google Scholar
  16. Soedjito, H. (1982) Vegetation and ethnobotany in Long Sungai Barang and Long Segar. Unpublished Final Report for IBPF.Google Scholar
  17. Vayda, A. P. (1981) Research in East Kalimantan on interactions between people and forests: a preliminary report,Borneo Research Bulletin, 13(1), pp. 3–15.Google Scholar
  18. Vayda, A. P. (1982) Project on “Shifting Cultivation and Patch Dynamics in an Upland Forest in East Kalimantan, Indonesia” (US Forest Service Grant No. 59-PSW-81-003G). Interim Report, August, 1982. Typescript.Google Scholar
  19. Vayda, A. P. (1983) Progressive contextualization: methods for research in human ecology,Human Ecology, 11, in press.Google Scholar
  20. Vayda, A. P. and Jessup, T. C. (1980) Shifting cultivation and patch dynamics in an upland forest in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Research proposal submitted to the “Consortium for the Study of Man's Relationship with the Global Environment”. Typescript.Google Scholar
  21. Vayda, A. P., Colfer, C. J. P. and Brotokusumo, M. (1980) Interactions between people and forests in East Kalimantan,Impact of Science on Society, 33, pp. 179–190.Google Scholar
  22. Whittier, H. L. (1973) Social organization and symbol of social differentiation: An ethnographic study of the Kenyah Dayak of East Kalimantan (Borneo),Ph.D. Dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kartawinata
    • 1
  • H. Soedjito
    • 1
  • T. Jessup
    • 2
  • A. P. Vayda
    • 2
  • C. J. P. Colfer
    • 3
  1. 1.Herbarium, Bogoriense, Lembago Biologi NasionalL.I.P.I.BogorIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Human EcologyRutgers UniversityNew BrunswickUSA
  3. 3.College of Tropical Agriculture and Human ResourcesUniversity of HawaiiHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations