# Realism, operationalism, and quantum mechanics

Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated to Günther Ludwig

Received:

- 137 Downloads
- 36 Citations

## Abstract

A comprehensive formal system is developed that amalgamates the operational and the realistic approaches to quantum mechanics. In this formalism, for example, a sharp distinction is made between events, operational propositions, and the properties of physical systems.

## Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Physical System Formal System Realistic Approach Sharp Distinction
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- 1.D. Aerts, “Description of many physical entities without the paradoxes encountered in quantum mechanics,”
*Found. Phys.***12**, 1131 (1982).Google Scholar - 2.E. Beltrametti and G. Cassinelli,
*The Logic of Quantum Mechanics*(Volume 15 of*Encyclopedia of Mathematics and its Applications*), G.-C. Rota, ed. (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1981).Google Scholar - 3.G. Birkhoff,
*Lattice Theory*(American Math. Society Colloquium Publication XXV), 3rd ed., 1967.Google Scholar - 4.A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, “Can the quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?”
*Phys. Review***47**, 777–780 (1935).Google Scholar - 5.H. Fischer and G. Rüttimann, “The geometry of the state space,” in
*Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory*, A. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 153–176.Google Scholar - 6.D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “Manuals, morphisms, and quantum mechanics,” in
*Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory*, A. Marlow, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1978), pp. 105–126.Google Scholar - 7.D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “What are quantum logics and what ought they to be?” in
*Current Issues in Quantum Logic*, E. Beltrametti and B. van Fraassen, eds. (Plenum Press, New York, 1981), pp. 35–52.Google Scholar - 8.D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “Empirical logic and tensor products,” in
*Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory*, H. Neumann, ed. (B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 9–20.Google Scholar - 9.D. J. Foulis and C. H. Randall, “The empirical logic approach to the physical sciences,” in
*Foundations of Quantum Mechanics and Ordered Linear Spaces*, A. Hartkämper and H. Neumann, eds. (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1974), pp. 230–249.Google Scholar - 10.A. M. Gleason, “Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space,”
*J. Math. Mech.***6**, 885–893 (1957).Google Scholar - 11.R. J. Greechie, “On the structure of orthomodular lattices satisfying the chain condition,”
*J. Combinatorial Theory***4**, 210–218 (1968).Google Scholar - 12.P. R. Halmos,
*Lectures on Boolean Algebras*(D. van Nostrand, Princeton, 1963).Google Scholar - 13.A. A. Lodkin, “Every measure on the projectors of a
*W**-algebra can be extended to a state,”*Functional Analysis and its Applications***8**, 318–321 (1974).Google Scholar - 14.
- 15.
- 16.B. Mielnik, “Quantum logic: Is it necessarily orthocomplemented?” in
*Quantum Mechanics, Determinism, Causality, and Particles*, M. Flato*et al.*, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976).Google Scholar - 17.C. Piron,
*Foundations of Quantum Physics*(W. A. Benjamin, Inc., Reading, Mass., 1976).Google Scholar - 18.C. Piron, “New quantum mechanics,” in
*Old and New Questions in Physics, Cosmology, Philosophy, and Theoretical Biology: Essays in Honor of Wolfgang Yourgrau*(Plenum Press, New York, 1983).Google Scholar - 19.C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “The operational approach to quantum mechanics,” in
*The Logico-Algebraic Approach to Quantum Mechanics*III:*Physical Theory as Logical-Operational Structure*, C. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1978), pp. 167–201.Google Scholar - 20.C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “Operational statistics and tensor products,” in
*Interpretations and Foundations of Quantum Theory*, H. Neumann, ed. (B. I. Wissenschaftsverlag, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim, 1981), pp. 21–28.Google Scholar - 21.C. H. Randall and D. J. Foulis, “A mathematical setting for inductive reasoning,” in
*Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science*III, C. Hooker, ed. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 169–205.Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1983