The Visual Computer

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 19–33 | Cite as

Efficient, complete radiosity ray tracing using a shadow-coherence method

  • Arjan J. F. Kok
  • Frederik W. Jansen
  • Charles Woodward
Original Articles

Abstract

Most two-pass rendering methods calculate a radiosity shading for each patch or element in a scene in the first pass. This shading contains two components: one for the light received directly from the main light sources and one representing the intensity of the light received indirectly by means of diffuse and specular interreflection between patches. However, it is very difficult to achieve accurate representation of the distribution of this radiosity shading over the patch, particularly where clearly visible shadow boundaries exist. A better approach is to store only the indirect reflection component in the form of radiosity shading, and to calculate the direct reflection component during the second pass by casting shadow rays. This approach normally requires that many shadow rays must be cast. However, the number of rays for shadow testing can be kept low by selecting only those light sources that substantially contribute to the shading of a patch and applying an adaptive image refinement technique in combination with a shadow coherence method.

Key words

Rendering Radiosity Ray tracing Source selection Shadow coherence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akimoto T, Mase K, Hashimoto A, Suenaga Y (1989) Pixel selected ray tracing. Proc Eurographics, pp 39–50Google Scholar
  2. Arvo J (1986) Backward ray tracing. Developments in ray tracing. Siggraph course notesGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouville C, Dubois JL, Marchal I, Viaud ML (1988) Monte-Carlo integration applied to an illumination model. Proc Eurographics, pp 483–497Google Scholar
  4. Campbell AT, Fussell DS (1990) Adaptive mesh generation for global diffuse illumination. Comput Graph 24(4):155–164Google Scholar
  5. Chen SE, Rushmeier HE, Miller G, Turner D (1991) A progressive multi-pass method for global illumination. Comput Graph 25(4):165–174Google Scholar
  6. Cohen MF, Greenberg DP (1985) The hemi-cube: a radiosity solution for complex environments. Comput Graph 19(3):31–40Google Scholar
  7. Cohen MF, Greenberg DP, Immel DS, Brock PJ (1986) An efficient radiosity approach for realistic image synthesis. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 6(3):26–35Google Scholar
  8. Cohen MT, Cheng SE, Wallace JR, Greenberg DP (1988) A progressive refinement approach to fast radiosity image generation. Comput Graph 22(4):75–84Google Scholar
  9. Cook RL (1986) Stochastic sampling in computer graphics. ACM Trans Graph 5(1):51–72Google Scholar
  10. Dippé MAZ, Wold EH (1985) Antialiasing through stochastic sampling. Comput Graph 19(3):69–78Google Scholar
  11. Goral CM, Torrance KE, Greenberg DP, Battaile B (1984) Modelling the interaction of light between diffuse surfaces. Comput Graph 18(3):212–222Google Scholar
  12. Haines EA, Greenberg DP (1986) The light buffer: a ray tracer shadow testing accelerator. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 6(9):6–16Google Scholar
  13. Hall RA (1988) Illumination and color in computer generated imagery. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Heckbert PS (1990) Adaptive radiosity textures for bidirectional ray tracing. Comput Graph 24(4):145–154Google Scholar
  15. Immel DS, Cohen MF, Greenberg DP (1986) A radiosity method for non-diffuse environments. Comput Graph 20(4):133–142Google Scholar
  16. Jansen FW, Wijk JJ van (1984) Previewing techniques in raster graphics. Comput and Graph 8(2):149–161Google Scholar
  17. Kajiya JT (1986) The rendering equation. Comput Graph 20(4):143–150Google Scholar
  18. Kok AJF, Jansen FW (1991) Source selection for the direct lighting computation in global illumination. Proc Eurographics Workshop on Rendering, Barcelona Spain, 13–15 May 1991Google Scholar
  19. Painter J, Sloan K (1989) Antialiased ray tracing by adaptive progressive refinement. Comput Graph 23(3):281–288Google Scholar
  20. Roth S (1982) Ray casting for modeling solids. Comput Graph Image Proc 18(2):109–144Google Scholar
  21. Rushmeier HE (1988) Realistic image synthesis for scenes with radiatively participating media. Thesis, Cornell UniversityGoogle Scholar
  22. Shen L, Deprettere E, Dewilde P (1992) A new space partitioning for mapping computations of the radiosity method onto a highly pipelined parallel architecture. Advances in Computer Graphics Hardware V, Springer BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Shirley P (1990) A ray tracing method for illumination calculation in diffuse specular scenes. Proc Graph Interface, pp 205–212Google Scholar
  24. Sillion F, Puech C (1989) A general two pass method integrating specular and diffuse reflection. Comput Graph 23(3):335–344Google Scholar
  25. Wallace JR, Cohen MF, Greenberg DP (1987) A two-pass solution to the rendering equation: a synthesis of ray tracing and radiosity methods. Comput Graph 24(4):311–320Google Scholar
  26. Ward GJ, Rubinstein FM, Clear RD (1988) A ray tracing solution for diffuse interreflection. Comput Graph 22(4):85–92Google Scholar
  27. Whitted T (1980) An improved illumination model for shaded display. ACM Commun 23(6):343–349Google Scholar
  28. Woo A, Amanatides J (1990) Voxel occlusion testing: a shadow determination accelerator for ray tracing. Proc Graphics Interface, pp 213–220Google Scholar
  29. Woodward C (1990) Methods for computer-aided design of free-form objects. Thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics and Computer Science Series No. 56, Finnish Academy, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arjan J. F. Kok
    • 1
  • Frederik W. Jansen
    • 1
  • Charles Woodward
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Technical Mathematics and InformaticsDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute of Industrial AutomationHelsinki University of TechnologyEspoo 15Finland

Personalised recommendations