Applied Mathematics and Mechanics

, Volume 5, Issue 3, pp 1345–1357

Mixed hybrid penalty finite element method and its application

• Liang Guo-ping
• Fu Zi-zhi
Article

Abstract

The penalty and hybrid methods are being much used in dealing with the general incompatible element. With the penalty method convergence can always be assured, but comparatively speaking its accuracy is lower, and the condition number and sparsity are not so good. With the hybrid method, convergence can be assured only when the rank condition is satisfied. So the construction of the element is extremely limited. This paper presents the mixed hybrid penalty element method, which combines the two methods together, And it is proved theoretically that this new method is convergent, and it has the same accuracy, condition number and sparsity as the compatible element. That is to say, they are optimal to each other.

Finally, a new triangle element for plate bending with nine freedom degrees is constructed with this method (three degrees of freedom are given on each corner—one displacement and two rotations), the calculating formula of the element stiffness matrix is almost the same as that of the old triangle element for plate bending with nine degrees of freedom. But it is converged to true solution with arbitrary irregrlar triangle subdivision. If the true solutionu∈H3 with this method the linear and quadratic rates of convergence are obtianed for three bending moments and for the displacement and two rotations respectively.

Keywords

Finite Element Method Assure Condition Number Stiffness Matrix Hybrid Method

Preview

References

1. (1).
Babuska, I. and M. Zlamal, Nonconforming elements in finite element method with penalty, SIAM J. Numer, Anal., Vol. 10, No. 5(1973).Google Scholar
2. (2).
Feng Kang, On the theory of discontinuous finite element method, Journal of Computing Mathematics, 1: 4 (1979). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
3. (3).
Fix. G.J., G. Liang and D.N. Lee, Penalty-hybrid finite element method. (to be published in Math. and Comp. With Appl.)Google Scholar
4. (4).
Brezzi,F., On the Existence, Uniqueness and Approximation of Saddle Point Problems Arising from Lagragian Multipliers, RAIRO Numer. Anal., 8, R 2, (1974).Google Scholar
5. (5).
Oden, J.T. and J.N. Reddy, Variational Methods in Theoretical Mechanics, Spring-Verlag, Heidelberg, (1976).Google Scholar
6. (6).
Ciarlet, P., The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North Holland Publisher, (1979).Google Scholar
7. (7).
Oden, J.T. and J.N. Reddy, Mathematical Theory of Finite Elements, John Wiley & Sons, New York, (1975).Google Scholar
8. (8).
Treves, F., Basic Linear Partial Differential Equations, Academic Press, New York, (1975).Google Scholar
9. (9).
Liang Guo-ping and Fu Zi-zhi, The construction of large elements in finite element method, Applied Math ematics and Mechanics, Vol. 4, No. 3, (1983).Google Scholar
10. (10).
Kordratev, V.A., Boundary Value Problems for Elliptic Equations in Domains with Conical or Singular Points, Trudy Moskov Mat. OBSC, 16(1967).Google Scholar