Skip to main content
Log in

Time and site of theS-gene action, breeding systems and relationships in incompatibility

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In self-incompatible angiosperms correlations have been discovered between the genetic systems of compatibility control, floral morphology, pollen cytology, and site of pollen inhibition. The present paper critically reviews these relationships and their exceptions with particular reference to the time and site of theS-gene action. A hypothesis explaining these relationships and some of the exceptions has been proposed earlier. The major factor affecting these relationships is believed to be time of theS-gene action — late- or post-meiotic (not earlier than telophase I) in the gametophytic system and early (homomorphic) — or premeiotic (heteromorphic) in the sporophytic system. Recent work of Heslop-Harrison and his colleagues has provided additional evidence about the suggested timing of theS-gene action in the gametophytic species. In the sporophytic species, however, Heslop-Harrison suggests that theS-gene action occurs in the tapetum and not in the meiocytes. In the present discussion it is argued that tapetal action of certain elements of theS-gene complex is possible, but only in the heteromorphic species. It is suggested that major exceptions are by-products of secondary evolution of incompatibility after the primary incompatibility had been disturbed, or had broken down.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arasu, N. T., 1968. Self-incompatibility in angiosperms: A review. Genetica 39: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. G., 1966. The evolution, functioning, and breakdown of heteromorphic incompatibility systems. I. ThePlumbaginaceae. Evolution 20: 349–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J., 1954. The diversity of incompatibility systems in flowering plants. Proc. VIII Int. Bot. Congr., Paris, Sect. 10: 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, A. J., 1956. Cryptic self-incompatibility in the wallflower:Cheiranthus cheiri L. Heredity 10: 257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L., 1957. Pollen cytology and self-incompatibility systems in plants. J. Hered. 48: 271–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L. &Natrajan, A. T., 1960. Centric fragments and pollen-part mutation of incompatibility alleles inPetunia. Genetics 45: 699–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L. &Shapiro, N., 1959. Homozygosity andS gene mutation. Nature 183: 1209–1210.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bubar, J. S., 1959. Differences between self-incompatibility and self-sterility. Nature 183: 411–412.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cleland, R. E., 1950. Studies inOenothera cytogenetics and phylogeny. Indiana University Sci. Ser. 16: 1–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cope, F. W., 1958. Incompatibility inTheobroma cacao. Nature 181: 279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, L. K., 1954. Incompatibility inCosmos bipinnatus. Heredity 8: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, L. K., 1955. The evolution of incompatibility in species ofOenothera. Heredity 9: 293–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, W. F., 1949. The morphological aspects of self-sterility inLotus corniculatus. Ph. D. Thesis, University of Missouri, Columbia.

  • Hecht, A., 1964. Partial inactivation of an incompatibility substance in the stigmas and styles ofOenothera. In:H. F. Linskens (Ed.) Pollen physiology and fertilization. North-Holland, Amsterdam, p. 237–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., 1968a. Ribosome sites andS-gene action. Nature 218: 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, J., 1968b. Tapetal origin of pollen-coat substances inLilium. New Phytol. 67: 779–786.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroh, M., 1964. An electron microscopic study of the behavior ofCruciferae pollen after pollination. In:H. F. Linskens (Ed.), Pollen physiology and fertilization. North-Holland Publ. Co. Amsterdam, p. 221–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1949. Structure of the incompatibility gene. II. Induced mutation rate. Heredity 3: 339–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1954. Comparative incompatibility in angiosperms and fungi. Adv. Gent. 6: 235–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1956. Incompatibility and plant breeding. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 9: 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., 1961. Chromosome fragments and mutation of the incompatibility gene. Nature 190: 990–991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. &Crowe, L. K., 1958. Unilateral interspecific incompatibility in flowering plants. Heredity 12: 233–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linskens, H. F. &Heinen, W., 1962. Cutinase-Nachweizen Pollen. Z.Bot. 50: 338–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundquist, A., 1964. The genetics of incompatibility. In.S. J. Geerts (Ed.), Genetics Today. Pergamon, London, p. 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, A., Heslop-Harrison, J. &Dickinson, H. G., 1967. Elimination of ribosomes during meiotic prophase. Nature, 215: 997–999.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makinen, Y. L. A. &Lewis, D., 1962. Immunological analysis of incompatibility (S) proteins and of crossreacting material in a self-compatible mutant ofOenothera organensis. Genet. Res. 3: 352–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K., 1943. Specific differences inPetunia. I. Incompatibility. J. Genet. 45: 215–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. &De Winton, D., 1941. Adaptation and counteradaptation of the breeding system inPrimula. Ann. Bot. 5: 297–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1956a. Mutation of self-incompatibility alleles inTrifolium pratense andT. repens. Genetics 41: 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1956b. Incompatibility in autotetraploidTrifolium pratense. Genetics 41: 353–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1957. Genetics of self-incompatibility inPhysalis ixocarpa Brot. A new system. Am. J. Bot. 44: 879–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1959. Mutations of the self-incompatibility gene (S) and pseudocompatibility in angiosperms. Lloydia 22: 222–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1960. Evolution of gametophytic and sporophytic systems of self-incompatibility in angiosperms. Evolution 14: 98–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1965. Centric chromosome fragments and pollen-part mutation of the incompatibility gene inNicotiana alata. Nature 206: 792–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1967. Elements of theS-gene complex. II. Mutation and complementation at theS I locus inNicotiana alata. Heredity 22: 255–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1968. Compatibility relationships in flowering plants: Role of theS-gene complex. Am. Nat. 102: 475–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, K. K., 1969. Elements of theS-gene complex. V. Interspecific cross-compatibility relationships and theory of the evolution of theS complex. Genetica 40: 447–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panella, A. &Lorenzetti, F., 1966. Selfing and selection in alfalfa breeding programmes. Euphytica 15: 248–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, D. G., 1958. The nature of the breeding system in the field bean (V. faba L.) and its relationship to breeding for yield. Heredity 12: 113–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schürhoff, P. N., 1926. Die Zytologie der Blutenpflanzen. Ferdinand Ente, Stuttgart.

  • Steiner, E., 1961. Incompatibility in the complex-heterozygotes ofOenothera. Genetics 46: 301–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, W. L. &Davis, R. L., 1954. Self- and crosscompatibility in alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Agron. J. 46: 452–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. L. K., 1950. Multiple allelomorph incompatibility of pollen and style in the evolution of angiosperms. Ann. Bot. 14: 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pandey, K.K. Time and site of theS-gene action, breeding systems and relationships in incompatibility. Euphytica 19, 364–372 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904215

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01904215

Keywords

Navigation