Skip to main content
Log in

Resistance of tomato cultivars and progenies to fruit hollowness

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In field experiments with fall and winter tomatoes, the incidence of fruit hollowness was found to range from 0 to more than 80%, depending both on the cultivar and the environment. The most resistant cultivars were Bonner Beste and Potentate; the most susceptible were Exhibiton, Moneymaker, E.S. 1, Berco, Cromco and Ailsa Craig. The rate of hollowness of F1 and F2 generations of crosses between resistant and susceptible parents suggests that resistance behaves as a partially dominant character governed by a small number of genes. Thus, commercial F1 hybrids resistant to the disorder are easy to produce. The heritability of the resistance character was found to be rather high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allard, R. W., 1960. Principles of plant breeding. Wiley, New York, N.Y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewbaker, J. L., 1964. Agricultural Genetics. Prentice-Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, L., 1941. The inheritance of fruit size in the tomato. Can. J. Res. Sec. C. 19: 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. R. &Smith, H. H., 1939. Distinguishing between two types of gene action in quantitative inheritance. Genetics 24: 34–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friend, W. H., 1931. Tomato varieties and fertilizers for the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas. Bull. Tex. agric. Exp. Stn. 438.

  • Harrison, D. J., 1961. Influence of tomato mosaic virus infection on the hollow fruit condition of tomatoes. Nature, Lond. 192: 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kedar, N. &Palevitch, D., 1968. Seed number, specific gravity and external appearance of hollow tomato fruits. J. hort. Sci 43: 401–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khambanonda, I., 1950. Quantitative inheritance of fruit size in red peppers. Genetics 35: 322–343.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. W., 1941. Size inheritance in tomato fruit. J. Hered. 32: 291–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur, J. W. &Butler, L., 1938. Size inheritance and geometric growth processes in the tomato fruit. Genetics 23: 254–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palevitch, D., 1967. Studies on the puffiness of tomato fruit. Ph. D. dissertation. The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. (Hebrew, with English summary).

  • Powers, L., 1941. Inheritance of quantitative characters in crosses involving two species ofLycopersicon. J. agric. Res. 63: 149–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinnot, E. W., 1937. The relation of gene to character in quantitative inheritance. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 23: 224–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarnell, S. H.,Friend, W. H. &Wood, J. F., 1937. Factors affecting the amount of puffing in tomatoes. Bull. Tex. agric. Exp. Stn. 541.

  • Young, P. A., 1957. Superpuffed locules in tomato fruits. Rep. Tomato Genet. Coop. no. 7: 16.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Contribution from The Volcani Institute of Agricultural Research, Bet Dagan, Israel. 1969 Series, No. 1558-E.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palevitch, D., Kedar, N. Resistance of tomato cultivars and progenies to fruit hollowness. Euphytica 19, 253–260 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902953

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902953

Keywords

Navigation