Skip to main content
Log in

Promotion of pistillate flowering inCucurbita by 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

All accessions tested of four cultivated species ofCucurbita responded to seedling treatment with 250 ppm 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid by developing only pistillate flowers for an extended period. This growth regulator is a promising means of facilitating hybrid seed production of squash. A similar treatment did not induce flowering of wild species ofCucurbita that were vegetative under the environmental conditions of the experiment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bushnell, J. W., 1922. Isolation of uniform types of Hubbard squash by inbreeding. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 19: 139–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. B. &Jenkins, E. W., 1928. Pure line studies with ten generations of Hubbard squash. Vt. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 280, 29 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, M. B. &Stone, W. C., 1921. Yield and quality in Hubbard squash. Vt. Agr. Expt. Sta. Bull. 222, 48 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L. C., 1939. Heterosis in summer squash (Cucurbita pepo) and the possibilities of producing. F1 hybrid seed for commercial planting. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 37: 827–828.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L. C., 1941. Comparative earliness and productiveness of first and second generation summer squash (Curcurbita pepo) and the possibilities of using the second generation for commercial planting. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38: 596–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, L. C., 1942. Yankee hybrid summer squash, an early productive first generation cross. Conn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Circ. 152: 61–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haber, E. S., 1928. Inbreeding in the Table Queen (Des Moines) squash. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 25: 111–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayase, H. &Ueda, T., 1956.Cucurbita crosses. IX. Hybrid vigor of reciprocal F1 crosses inCucurbita maxima. Hokkaido Natl. Agr. Sta. Res. Bull. 71: 119–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, A. E. &Croston, F. E., 1941. Productivity of F1 hybrids in squash (Cucurbita maxima). Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 39: 332–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. W., Shannon, S. &Guardia, M. de la, 1969. Regulation of sex expression in the cucumber. BioScience 19: 141–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G. W., 1934. Observations on some inbred lines of bush types ofCucurbita pepo. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 32: 480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, D., 1949. Inheritance of certain economic characters in the squash,Cucurbita maxima Duch. Minn. Agr. Expt. Sta. Tech. Bull. 186, 30 pp.

  • U.S. Dept. Agr. Statistical Reporting Service, 1969. Vegetable Seed Reports, 8 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Approved by the Director of the New York State Agricultural Experiment Station for publication as Journal Paper No. 1737.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, R.W., Whitaker, T.W. & Bohn, G.W. Promotion of pistillate flowering inCucurbita by 2-chloroethylphosphonic acid. Euphytica 19, 180–183 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902942

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01902942

Keywords

Navigation