Skip to main content
Log in

Hierarchical trees can be perfectly scaled in one dimension

  • Published:
Journal of Classification Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Holman (1972) proved theorems which led him to suggest that there was a fundamental opposition between hierarchical clustering and non-metric Euclidean multidimensional scaling. Empirical experience has shown this to be untrue. Explanations of this apparent contradiction have been offered previously by Kruskal (1977) and Critchley (1986). In this paper we point out the feasibility of perfectly scaling a hierarchical tree in one dimension when the primary approach to ties (Kruskal 1964) is taken. Indeed, there is a whole polyhedral convex cone of solutions for which we obtain an explicit expression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • CRITCHLEY, F. (1985), “Ziggurats and Dendrograms: A Method of Ordering the Objects and An Alternative Visual Display,”Journal of Classification, submitted for publication.

  • CRITCHLEY, F. (1986), “Dimensionality Theorems in Multidimensional Scaling and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis,” inData Analysis and Informatics IV, eds. E. Diday, Y. Escoufier, L. Lebart, J.P. Pagès, Y. Schektman and R. Tomassone, Amsterdam: North Holland, 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEFAYS, D. (1978), “A Short Note on a Method of Seriation,”British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 31, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • HOLMAN, E. W. (1972), “The Relation Between Hierarchical and Euclidean Models for Psychological Distances,”Psychometrika, 37, 417–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • HUBERT, L., and ARABIE, P. (1986), “Unidimensional Scaling and Combinatorial Optimization,” inMultidimensional Data Analysis, eds. J. De Leeuw, W. Heiser, J. Meulman and F. Critchley, Leiden: DSWO Press, 181–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • KENDALL, D. G. (1969), “Some Problems and Methods in Statistical Archaeology,“World Archaeology, 1, 68–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUSKAL, J. B. (1964), “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing Goodness-of-fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis,”Psychometrika, 29, 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • KRUSKAL, J. B. (1977), “The Relationship Between Multidimensional Scaling and Clustering,” inClassification and Clustering, ed. J. Van Ryzin, New York: Academic Press, 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • SHEPARD, R. N. (1974), “Representation of Structure in Similarity Data: Problems and Prospects,”Psychometrika, 39, 373–422.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors wish to thank the editor and the reviewers for helpful comments on the manuscript.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Critchley, F., Heiser, W. Hierarchical trees can be perfectly scaled in one dimension. Journal of Classification 5, 5–20 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901668

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901668

Keywords

Navigation