Summary
Seven neighborhoods adjacent to hazardous waste were surveyed. The authors found that respondents did not rate their neighborhoods as highly as Americans as a whole, but, like most Americans, they did rate their present neighborhood better, or the same as, their previous one. The adjacent hazardous waste site was mentioned as distressing more often than any other neighborhood characteristic. Yet in four of the seven neighborhoods, dilapidated buildings and streets, odors and smoke from sewage treatment plants and factories, noise from trains and traffic congestion, or another neighborhood characteristic was mentioned as more stressful than the hazardous waste site. It is argued that govemment needs to be more aggressive about understanding community viewpoints before proposing multi-million dollar hazardous waste remediation plans that could be resisted by a community.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Brown, M. 1981.Laying Waste, Washinton Square Press, New York.
Campbell, A. 1981.The Sense of Well-being in America. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. and Rodgers, W. 1976.The Quality of American Life: Preception, Evaluations and Satisfactions. Russel Sage Foundation, New York.
Dahmann, D. 1983. Subjective assessments of neighborhood quality of size by place.Urban Studies,20, 31–45.
Drane, J. 1991. Imputing nonresponses to mail-back questionnaires.Am. J. Epidemiology,134, 908–912.
Edelstein, M. 1988.Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Feudenberg, N. 1984. Citizen action for environmental health: report on a survey of communit organizations.Am. J. Public Health.,74, 444–448.
Greenberg, M. and Anderson, R. 1984.Hazardous Waste Sites: The Credibility Gap. Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Greenberg, M., Krueckeberg, D., Kaltman, M., Metz, W. and Wilhelm, C. 1986. Local planning vs. national policy: urban growth near nuclear power stations in the United States.Town and Planning Review,57, 225–238.
Greenberg, M. and Hughes, J. 1992. The impact of hazardous waste Superfund site on the value of houses sold in New Jersey.Ann. Regional Sciences,26, 147–153.
Greenberg, M. and Hughes, J. 1993. Impact of hazardous waste sites on property value and land use: tax assessor's appraisal.The Appraisal Jurnal, January, 42–51.
Harris, Louis and Associates. 1980.The ABC-Harris Survey. The Harris Organization, New York.
Harris, Louis and Associates. 1990. Public mood has hardened to advocate tougher, stricter laws on air pollution. The Harris Poll, 1st April.
Hoehn, J., Berger, M. and Blomquist, G. 1987. A hedonic model of interregional wages, rents, and amenity values.J. Regional Science,27, 605–620.
Mason, A. 1989. Risk Perception in Communities on the Industrial Margin. PhD thesis. Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
McClelland, G., Schulze, W. and Hurd, B. 1990. The effect of risk beliefs on property values: a case study of a hazardous waste site.Risk Analysis,10, 485–497.
Machaels, G. and Smith, V. 1990. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: a case of hazardous waste sites.J. Urban Economics.28, 228–242.
MMWR. 1992. Hazardous waste sites: priority health conditions and research stretegies-United States.MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,41, 72–74.
National Research Council. 1991.Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Waste. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1989. US EPA, National priorities lists and supporting materials. October. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.
Ridley, S. and Piltz, R. 1989.State of the States. Renew America, Washington, DC, USA.
Rogerson, R., Findlay, A., Morris, A. and Coombes, M. 1989. Indicators of quality of life: some methoddological issues.Environment and Planning,A, 21, 1655–1666.
Roper Organization. 1987–1990.Roper Reports, The Roper Organization, New York, USA.
Russell, C., Colglazier, E. and English, M. 1991. Hazardous waste remediation: the task ahead. Waste Management Research and Education Institute, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Skaburskis, A. 1989. Impact attenuation in conflict situations?: The price effect of a nuisance land-use.Environmental and Planning,A, 21, 375–383.
Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J. and Gesell, G. 1991. Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada.Risk Analysis,11, 683–702.
Smith, V. and Desvousges, W. 1986. Asymmetries in the valuation of risk and the siting of hazardous waste disposal facilities.American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings.,76, 291–294.
Smith, V. and Desousges, W. 1987. An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes.J. Political Economy,95, 89–113.
Thompson, D. 1992. Living happily near a nuclear trash heap.Time, 11th May. 53–54.
Van Lierre, K. and Dunlap, R. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hpotheses explanations, and empirical evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly,44, 181–197.
US Department of Commerce. 1983–1991.American Housing Survery for the United States. Volumes for 1981, 193, 1985, 1987, and 1989. US Government Princting Office, Washington, DC, USA.
US Department of Commerce. 1990.American Housing Survey for the Northern New Jersey Metropolitan Area in 1987. US Bureau of the Census., Washington, DC, USA.
Von Allem, S., Greenwell, M., Hansen, H., Perdue, S., Price, P. and Schmidt, C. 1992.Quality of Life and ATSDR's Mission. ATSDR, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Professor Michael Greenberg and Dr Dona Schneider are regular contributors to this Journal. All three authors work in the Department of Urban Studies and Community Health, and support the New Jersey Graduate Program in Public Health at Rutgers University.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenberg, M., Schneider, D. & Martell, J. Hazardous waste sites, stress, and neighborhood quality in USA. Environmentalist 14, 93–105 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901303
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901303