Skip to main content
Log in

Hazardous waste sites, stress, and neighborhood quality in USA

  • Papers
  • Published:
Environmentalist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Seven neighborhoods adjacent to hazardous waste were surveyed. The authors found that respondents did not rate their neighborhoods as highly as Americans as a whole, but, like most Americans, they did rate their present neighborhood better, or the same as, their previous one. The adjacent hazardous waste site was mentioned as distressing more often than any other neighborhood characteristic. Yet in four of the seven neighborhoods, dilapidated buildings and streets, odors and smoke from sewage treatment plants and factories, noise from trains and traffic congestion, or another neighborhood characteristic was mentioned as more stressful than the hazardous waste site. It is argued that govemment needs to be more aggressive about understanding community viewpoints before proposing multi-million dollar hazardous waste remediation plans that could be resisted by a community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown, M. 1981.Laying Waste, Washinton Square Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A. 1981.The Sense of Well-being in America. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. and Rodgers, W. 1976.The Quality of American Life: Preception, Evaluations and Satisfactions. Russel Sage Foundation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahmann, D. 1983. Subjective assessments of neighborhood quality of size by place.Urban Studies,20, 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drane, J. 1991. Imputing nonresponses to mail-back questionnaires.Am. J. Epidemiology,134, 908–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelstein, M. 1988.Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feudenberg, N. 1984. Citizen action for environmental health: report on a survey of communit organizations.Am. J. Public Health.,74, 444–448.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. and Anderson, R. 1984.Hazardous Waste Sites: The Credibility Gap. Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M., Krueckeberg, D., Kaltman, M., Metz, W. and Wilhelm, C. 1986. Local planning vs. national policy: urban growth near nuclear power stations in the United States.Town and Planning Review,57, 225–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. and Hughes, J. 1992. The impact of hazardous waste Superfund site on the value of houses sold in New Jersey.Ann. Regional Sciences,26, 147–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, M. and Hughes, J. 1993. Impact of hazardous waste sites on property value and land use: tax assessor's appraisal.The Appraisal Jurnal, January, 42–51.

  • Harris, Louis and Associates. 1980.The ABC-Harris Survey. The Harris Organization, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Louis and Associates. 1990. Public mood has hardened to advocate tougher, stricter laws on air pollution. The Harris Poll, 1st April.

  • Hoehn, J., Berger, M. and Blomquist, G. 1987. A hedonic model of interregional wages, rents, and amenity values.J. Regional Science,27, 605–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, A. 1989. Risk Perception in Communities on the Industrial Margin. PhD thesis. Department of Geography, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, G., Schulze, W. and Hurd, B. 1990. The effect of risk beliefs on property values: a case study of a hazardous waste site.Risk Analysis,10, 485–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machaels, G. and Smith, V. 1990. Market segmentation and valuing amenities with hedonic models: a case of hazardous waste sites.J. Urban Economics.28, 228–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • MMWR. 1992. Hazardous waste sites: priority health conditions and research stretegies-United States.MMWR (Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report,41, 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. 1991.Environmental Epidemiology: Public Health and Hazardous Waste. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. 1989. US EPA, National priorities lists and supporting materials. October. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, S. and Piltz, R. 1989.State of the States. Renew America, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogerson, R., Findlay, A., Morris, A. and Coombes, M. 1989. Indicators of quality of life: some methoddological issues.Environment and Planning,A, 21, 1655–1666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper Organization. 1987–1990.Roper Reports, The Roper Organization, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C., Colglazier, E. and English, M. 1991. Hazardous waste remediation: the task ahead. Waste Management Research and Education Institute, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaburskis, A. 1989. Impact attenuation in conflict situations?: The price effect of a nuisance land-use.Environmental and Planning,A, 21, 375–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Layman, M., Kraus, N., Flynn, J., Chalmers, J. and Gesell, G. 1991. Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada.Risk Analysis,11, 683–702.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. and Desvousges, W. 1986. Asymmetries in the valuation of risk and the siting of hazardous waste disposal facilities.American Economic Review, Papers and Proceedings.,76, 291–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, V. and Desousges, W. 1987. An empirical analysis of the economic value of risk changes.J. Political Economy,95, 89–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. 1992. Living happily near a nuclear trash heap.Time, 11th May. 53–54.

  • Van Lierre, K. and Dunlap, R. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hpotheses explanations, and empirical evidence.Public Opinion Quarterly,44, 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Commerce. 1983–1991.American Housing Survery for the United States. Volumes for 1981, 193, 1985, 1987, and 1989. US Government Princting Office, Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Commerce. 1990.American Housing Survey for the Northern New Jersey Metropolitan Area in 1987. US Bureau of the Census., Washington, DC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Allem, S., Greenwell, M., Hansen, H., Perdue, S., Price, P. and Schmidt, C. 1992.Quality of Life and ATSDR's Mission. ATSDR, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Professor Michael Greenberg and Dr Dona Schneider are regular contributors to this Journal. All three authors work in the Department of Urban Studies and Community Health, and support the New Jersey Graduate Program in Public Health at Rutgers University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greenberg, M., Schneider, D. & Martell, J. Hazardous waste sites, stress, and neighborhood quality in USA. Environmentalist 14, 93–105 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01901303

Keywords

Navigation