Summary
The object of study was the physicochemical properties and the penetration through the BBB (hematoencephalic barrier) in albino mice of atropine, amysil, and lachesine which were injected intravenously and into the lateral ventricle of the brain. The degree of penetration of these substances through the brain barrier was determined by the size of the dose (ED50) preventing arecoline tremor in mice.
Comparison of the degree of penetration of cholinolytics through the BBB with their physicochemical properties showed that the molecular weight, percentage of ionization, and solubility of cholinolytics in water did not have a substantial effect on their penetration through the BBB. The PKa and distribution coefficient were of certain significance for atropine, amysil, and lachesine penetration. As regards penetration through the BBB a difference was established not only between the tertiary and quaternary cholinolytics but also between tertiary compounds (amysil showed better penetration into the brain than atropine).
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
A. E. Aleksandrova, In book: The Pharmacology of Neurotropic Drugs [in Russian], Leningrad (1963), p. 9.
S. N. Golikov and V. A. Pechenkin Byull. Éksper. Biol. No. 11 (1963), p. 82.
É. V. Zeimal' and Z. Vatava, Activ. Nerv. Sup. Vol. 3, Praha (1961), p. 276.
É. V. Zeimal' and M. Ya. Mikhel'son, In book: Tissue-Blood Barriers [in Russian], Moscow (1961), p. 166.
B. B. Brodie, H. Kurz, and, L. S. Schanker, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., Vol. 130 (1960), p. 20.
T. J. Haley and W. G. McCormick, Brit. J. Pharmacol., Vol. 12 (1957), p. 12.
S. E. Mayer and R. P. Maickel Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., Vol. 119 (1957), p. 167.
L. C. Miller and M. L. Tainter, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., Vol. 57, New York (1944), p. 261.
L. S. Schanker, Pharmacol. Rev., Vol. 14 (1962), p. 501.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pechenkin, V.A. Differences in the permeability of the blood-brain barrier to cholinolytic substances. Bull Exp Biol Med 61, 545–547 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01892450
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01892450