Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 18, Issue 3, pp 357–371 | Cite as

The philosophy of Erwin Schrödinger: A diachronic view of Schrödinger's thoughts

  • Miguel Ferrero Melgar
Part V. Invited Papers Commemorating The Centenary Of The Birth Of Erwin Schrödinger

Abstract

There is no agreement within the scientific community about the philosophy of Schrödinger. Some people think that he was a realist, while others defend him as an idealist. In this paper we study a number of Schrödinger's works and we show that the epithets of realist and idealist do not do him justice. Toward the end we conclude that it would be more adequate to place him in the trend known as the philosophy of immanence.

Keywords

Scientific Community Defend Erwin Diachronic View 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    F. Selleri,Die Debatte um die Quantentheorie (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1983).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1982), pp. 102, 106, and 174.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    E. Bitsakis,A la recherche de la réalité microphysique (University of Ioannina, Greece), p. 200; inMicrofisica: Determinismo o Neo-misticismo (Paradigmi, Rivista di critica filosofica, Anno IV, No. 10) (Schena Editore, Italy, 1986), pp. 37–47.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    N. Herbert,Quantum Reality (Rider, London, 1985), pp. 23 and 120.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. R. Popper,Autobiography (inThe Library of Living Philosophers) (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. Shimony, “Reflexions sur la philosophie de Bohr, Heisenberg et Schrödinger,” inLes Implications Conceptuelles de la Physique Quantique, J. Phys.42, C-2 (Editions de Physique, Paris, 1981).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    B. d'Espagnat,Conceptions de la physique contemporaine (Hermann, Paris, 1965).Google Scholar
  8. 9.
    P. S. Epstein, “The Reality Problem in Quantum Mechanics,”Am. J. Phys. 13, 126–135 (1945).Google Scholar
  9. 10.
    M. Ferrero, “What kind of realism?,” inDeterminism in Physics, E. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis, eds. (Gutenberg, Athens, 1985).Google Scholar
  10. 11.
    J. Wheeler, in the book quoted in Ref. 8-VI, p. 184.Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    E. Schrödinger, in Ref. 8-XIV above, p. 237.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    This passage has been taken from D. Bohm inThe Ghost in the Atom, P. C. W. Davies and J. R. Brown, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986), p. 132.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    R. Feynman,La Nature de la Physique (Seuil, Paris, 1980), Chap. 5; original in English:The Character of Physical Law (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    A comprehensive study of the scientific and philosophical works of Schrödinger isErwin Schrödinger: An Introduction to His Writings, William T. Scott, ed. (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1967).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Miguel Ferrero Melgar
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de FísicaUniversidad de OviedoOviedoSpain

Personalised recommendations