Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The philosophy of Erwin Schrödinger: A diachronic view of Schrödinger's thoughts

  • Part V. Invited Papers Commemorating The Centenary Of The Birth Of Erwin Schrödinger
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is no agreement within the scientific community about the philosophy of Schrödinger. Some people think that he was a realist, while others defend him as an idealist. In this paper we study a number of Schrödinger's works and we show that the epithets of realist and idealist do not do him justice. Toward the end we conclude that it would be more adequate to place him in the trend known as the philosophy of immanence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Selleri,Die Debatte um die Quantentheorie (Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. K. R. Popper,Quantum Theory and the Schism in Physics (Hutchinson, London, 1982), pp. 102, 106, and 174.

    Google Scholar 

  3. E. Bitsakis,A la recherche de la réalité microphysique (University of Ioannina, Greece), p. 200; inMicrofisica: Determinismo o Neo-misticismo (Paradigmi, Rivista di critica filosofica, Anno IV, No. 10) (Schena Editore, Italy, 1986), pp. 37–47.

  4. N. Herbert,Quantum Reality (Rider, London, 1985), pp. 23 and 120.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. R. Popper,Autobiography (inThe Library of Living Philosophers) (Open Court, La Salle, Illinois, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. Shimony, “Reflexions sur la philosophie de Bohr, Heisenberg et Schrödinger,” inLes Implications Conceptuelles de la Physique Quantique, J. Phys.42, C-2 (Editions de Physique, Paris, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. d'Espagnat,Conceptions de la physique contemporaine (Hermann, Paris, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. S. Epstein, “The Reality Problem in Quantum Mechanics,”Am. J. Phys. 13, 126–135 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Ferrero, “What kind of realism?,” inDeterminism in Physics, E. Bitsakis and N. Tambakis, eds. (Gutenberg, Athens, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. Wheeler, in the book quoted in Ref. 8-VI, p. 184.

  11. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  12. E. Schrödinger, in Ref. 8-XIV above, p. 237.

  13. This passage has been taken from D. Bohm inThe Ghost in the Atom, P. C. W. Davies and J. R. Brown, eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1986), p. 132.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Feynman,La Nature de la Physique (Seuil, Paris, 1980), Chap. 5; original in English:The Character of Physical Law (M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. A comprehensive study of the scientific and philosophical works of Schrödinger isErwin Schrödinger: An Introduction to His Writings, William T. Scott, ed. (University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst, Mass., 1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Departamento de Física, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007, Oviedo, Spain

    Miguel Ferrero Melgar

Authors
  1. Miguel Ferrero Melgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferrero Melgar, M. The philosophy of Erwin Schrödinger: A diachronic view of Schrödinger's thoughts. Found Phys 18, 357–371 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891496

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891496

Keywords

Search

Navigation