Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

W(h)ither expert systems? — A view from outside

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper questions the expert system paradigm, both in terms of its range of application, and as a significant contribution to the understanding of artificial intelligence. The viewpoint is that of the systems designer who must judge the applicability of these methods in imminent and future systems. The expert system paradigm, (ESP for short), is criticised not because it is ubiquitously wrong, but because its range of application appears to be very limited, and much promise is made of its application in areas where its success is likely to be little more than a matter of luck. The paper considers the success in both academic and commercial settings. It is suggested that the contribution of the ESP to the wider ambitions of AI is modest, and to the practical user is still a considerable and largely unquantifiable risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alvey Programme (1987). Achievements Within the IKBS Programme,Alvey News. April.

  2. Anderson, I. (1984). AI Is Naked From the Waist Up,New Scientist. 15 November.

  3. Bell, M.Z. (1985). Why Expert Systems Fail,Journal of Operational Research Society (GB). 36, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bennett, C.H. (1982). The Thermodynamics of Computation — a review,International Journal of Theoretical Physics. 21, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bundy, A. (1987). Reliability of Expert Systems, inProc. ES '87 — The Seventh Annual Technical Conference of the BCS Specialist Group on Expert Systems, Brighton, England, 14–17 Dec 87, Cambridge University Press.

  6. d'Agapayeff, A. (1987). Report to the Alvey Directorate on the Second Short Survey of Expert Systems in UK Business. Alvey Directorate, Millbank Tower, London.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Deutsch, D. (1985). Quantum Theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer.Proceedings Royal Society, London, A400. 97–117.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dreyfus, H. (1972).What Computers Can't Do. Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dreyfus, H.L. and S.E. Dreyfus (1986).Mind Over Machine. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. (1987)Expert Systems in Business. 1, 1.

  11. Fahlman, S.E. and G.E. Hinton (1987). Connectionist Architectures for Artificial Intelligence,IEEE Transactions on Computers. 20, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gregory, D. (1986). Delimiting Expert Systems,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. SMC-16, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haugheland, J. (1985).Artificial Intelligence — the Very Idea. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hewett, J. (1986). Commercial Expert Systems in North America inECAI. Ovum Ltd., London. p96.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hammond, K.R. (1986). Generalization in Operational contexts: what does it mean? Can it be done?,IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. SMC-16, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ICL Information Sheet (1987).Adviser at Work. International Computers Limited, London. (Issued at the Alvey Conference UMIST, Manchester, UK, 1987).

  17. IEEE. (1987). Special Issue on Causal and Diagnostic Reasoning,IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics. SMC-17, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kelly, J. (1987). Intelligent Machines: what chance? in Hallam and Mellish (eds)Advances in Artificial Intelligence. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kidd, A. and W.P. Sharp (1987). Goals for Expert Systems Research — An Analysis of Tasks and Domains, inProc. ES '87 — The Seventh Annual Technical Conference of the BCS Specialist Group on Expert Systems, Brighton, England, 14–17 Dec 87,

  20. Lynch, F. et al. (1986). AI in Manufacturing at Digitial,The AI Magazine. Winter.

  21. Smith, B. (1985). Models in Expert systems. IJCAI.

  22. (1986).Spang-Robinson Report. Spang Robinson, Palo Alto, California. 2,10.

  23. (1987).Spang-Robinson Report. Spang Robinson, Palo Alto, California. 3,6

  24. Stefik, M. (1986). The AI Business Book Business,Artificial Intelligence. 28.

  25. Sutherland, J.W. (1986). Assessing the Artificial Intelligence Contribution to Decision Technology,IEEE Transactions on System, Man and Cybernetics. SMC-16, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  26. (1987)Ulrich's Periodicals Directory. (Literature search on Artificial Intelligence).

  27. van de Brug, A., J. Bachant and J. McDermott (1986). The Taming of R1,IEEE Expert. 1, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  28. van de Brug, A. (1987) Private communication, 1 July.

  29. Winograd. T. (1985). Expert Systems: How Far Can They Go?,Proceedings of the Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1985 (IJCAI-85), Los Altos. William Kaufmann Inc., Los Altos, California. p1306.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winston, P.H. and K.A. Prendergast (1984).The AI Business — The Commercial Uses of Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Admiralty Research Establishment, Portsdown, Cosham, Hants

    Ian White

Authors
  1. Ian White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

White, I. W(h)ither expert systems? — A view from outside. AI & Soc 2, 161–171 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891382

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891382

Keywords

Search

Navigation