Skip to main content

IUD: Past - present - future

Advances in Contraception volume 5, pages 205–212 (1989)Cite this article

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. van Os, W.A.A. (1987). The Multiload intrauterine device: development and evaluation. Ph.D thesis, University of Utrecht

  2. ZipperJ., TatumH.J., PasteneL., MedelM. and RiveraM. (1969). Metallic copper as an intrauterine contraceptive adjunct to the ‘T’ device.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,109, 1274–1278

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (1987). Mechanisms of action, safety and efficacy of intrauterine devices. Technical Report Series 753

  4. Treiman, K. and Liskin, L. (1988). IUDs — a new look. Population Reports, series B, number 5.

  5. RhemrevP.E.R., vanOsW.A.A., EdelmanD.A. and BadrawiH.H. (1988). Medical removals of the Multiload IUD.Adv. Contracept.,4, 125

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. EdelmanD.A., BergerG.S. and KeithL. (1979).Intrauterine Devices and their Complications. G.K. Hall & Co., Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. vanOsW.A.A. and EdelmanD.A. (1988). Fifteen years' experience with the Multiload IUD.Adv. Contracept.,4, 165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. LeeN.C., RubinG.L., OryH.W. and BurkmanR.T. (1983). Type of intrauterine device and the risk of pelvic inflammatory disease.Obstet. Gynecol.,62, 1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. StadlB.V. and SchlesselmanS. (1984). Extent of surgery for pelvic inflammatory disease in relation to duration of intrauterine device use.Obstet. Gynecol.,63, 171–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. LedgerW. (1986). Micro-organisms that cause infection. In:Infection in the Female. W.Ledger, ed., Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, pp. 9–34

    Google Scholar 

  11. EdelmanD.A. (1988). The use of intrauterine contraceptive devices, pelvic inflammatory disease, andChlamydia trachomatis infection.Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.,158, 956–959

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. SandmireH.F. (1986). Fertility after intrauterine device discontinuation.Adv. Contracept.,2, 327–335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. DalingJ.R., WeissN.R., MetchB.J., ChowW.H., SoderstromR.M., MooreD.E., SpadoniL.R. and StadlB.V. (1985). Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device.N. Engl. J. Med.,312, 937–941

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. CramerD.W., SchiffI., SchoenbaumS.C., GibsonM., BelisleS., AlbrechtB., StillmanR.J., BergerM.J., WilsonE., StadlB.V. and SeibelM. (1985). Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device.N. Engl. J. Med.,312, 941–947

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Elisabeth Gasthuis, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000 AK, Haarlem, The Netherlands

    W. A. A. van Os

Authors
  1. W. A. A. van Os
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Os, W.A.A. IUD: Past - present - future. Adv Contracept 5, 205–212 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890890

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01890890