Gastrointestinal Radiology

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 47–56 | Cite as

Complications of gastrointestinal radiologic procedures: II. Complications related to biliary tract studies

  • David J. Ott
  • David W. Gelfand
Article

Keywords

Public Health Biliary Tract Radiologic Procedure Tract Study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graham EA, Cole WH: Visualization of gallbladder by the sodium salt of tetrabromophthalein.JAMA 82:1777–1778, 1924Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoppe JO, Archer S: Observations on a series of aryl triiodo alkanoic acid derivatives with particular reference to a new cholecystographic medium, telepaque.Am J Roentgenol 69:631–637, 1953Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berk RN, Loeb PM, Goldberger LE, Sokodoff J: Oral cholecystography with iopanoic acid.N Engl J Med 290:204–210, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    White WW, Fischer HW: A double blind study of oragrafin and telepaque.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 87:745–748, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Juhl JH, Cooperman LR, Crummy AB: Oragrafin, a new cholecystographic medium.Radiology 80:87–91, 1963Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Russell JG, Frederick PR: Clinical comparison of tyropanoate sodium, ipodate sodium and iopanoic acid.Radiology 112:519–523, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parks RE: Double-blind study of four oral cholecystographic preparations.Radiology 112:525–528, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stanley RJ, Melson GL, Cubillo E, Hesker AE: A comparison of three cholecystographic agents.Radiology 112:513–517, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Krook PM, Bush Jr WH: Single dose oral cholecystography.Radiology 127:643–644, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McChesney EW, Banks Jr WF: Urinary excretion of three oral cholecystographic agents in man.Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 119:1027–1030, 1965.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shehadi WH: Clinical problems and toxicity of contrast agents.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 97:762–771, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teplick JG, Myerson RM, Sanen FJ: Acute renal failure following oral cholecystography.Acta Radiol 3:353–369, 1965Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanen FJ, Myerson RM, Teplick JG: Etiology of serious reactions to oral cholecystography.Arch Intern Med 113:241–247, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rene RM, Mellinkoff SM: Renal insufficiency after oral cholecystography of a double dose of a cholecystographic medium.N Engl J Med 261:589–592, 1959PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Setter JG, Maher JF, Schreiner GE: Acute renal failure following cholecystography.JAMA 184:102–110, 1963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Harrow BR, Sloane JA: Acute renal failure following oral cholecystography.Am J Med Sci 249:26–35, 1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harrow BR, Winslow OP: Renal toxicity following oral cholecystography with oragrafin (ipodate calcium).Radiology 87:721–724, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duggan Jr FJ, Rohner Jr TJ: Acute renal insufficiency following oral cholecystography.J Urol 109:156–159, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ansari Z, Baldwin DS: Acute renal failure due to radio-contrast agents.Nephron 17:28–40, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Malt RA, Olken HG, Goade Jr WJ: Renal tubular necrosis after oral cholecystography.Arch Surg 87:743–746, 1963PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fink Jr HE, Roenigk WJ, Wilson GP: An experimental investigation of the nephrotoxic effects of oral cholecystographic agents.Am J Med Sci 247:201–216, 1964PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Postlethwaite AE, Kelley WN: Uricosuric effect of radiocontrast agents.Ann Intern Med 74:845–852, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gelfand DW, Ott DJ, Klein A: Massive iopanoic acid (telepaque) overdose without ill effects.AJR 130:1174–1175, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sargent EN, Schulman A, Meyers HI, Gutler RB, Nicoloff JT, DiFazio LT: A new contrast medium for cholangiocholecystography: Meglumine iodoxamate.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 125:251–258, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Robbins AH, Earampamoorthy S, Koff RS, DiFazio LT, Wickis EA, Gertler AN: Successful intravenous cholecystocholangiography in the jaundiced patient using meglumine iodoxamate (cholovue).Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 126:70–76, 1976Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Loeb PM, Barnhart JL, Berk RN: Iotroxamide — A new intravenous cholangiographic agent.Radiology 125:323–329, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shehadi WH: Adverse reactions to intravascularly administered contrast media.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 124:145–152, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Johnson Jr JH, Wise RE: Intravenous cholangiography: A study of reactions to iodipamide methylglucamine.Lahey Clin Bull 13:245–250, 1964Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Peters GA, Hodgson JR, Donovan RJ: The effect of premedication with chlorpheniramine on reactions to methylglucamine iodipamide.J Allergy 38:74–83, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Scholz FJ, Johnston DO, Wise RE: Intravenous cholangiography. Optimum dosage and methodology.Radiology 114:513–518, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cogen FC, Zweiman B: Adverse radiographic contrast media reactions.Compr Ther 4:50–56, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ansell G: Adverse reactions to contrast agents.Invest Radiol 5:374–391, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Stillman AE: Hepatotoxic reaction to iodipamide meglumine injection.JAMA 228:1420–1421, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sutherland LR, Edwards LA, Medline A, Wilkinson RW, Connon JJ: Meglumine iodipamide (cholografin) hepatotoxicity.Ann Intern Med 86:431–439, 1977Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Craft IL, Swales JD: Renal failure after cholangiography.Br Med J 2:736–738, 1967PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sprent J, Spooner R, Powell LW: Acute renal failure complicating intravenous cholangiography in a patient with Dubin-Johnson syndrome.Med J Aust 2:446–448, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gold CH, Abrahams C, Cohen I: Acute renal failure following intravenous cholangiography.S Afr Med J 45:1400–1402, 1971PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brown RC, Cohen WN: Acute renal failure following intravenous cholangiography.South Med J 66:1142–1144, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sargent EN, Barbour BH, Espinosa N, Meyers HI: Evaluation of renal function following double dose infusion intravenous cholangiography.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 117:412–418, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McCune WS, Shorb PE, Moscovitz H: Endoscopic cannulation of the ampulla of Vater.Ann Surg 167:752–755, 1968PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nebel OT, Silvis SE, Rogers G, Sugawa C, Mandelstam P: Complications associated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastrointest Endosc 22:34–36, 1975Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bilbao MK, Dotter CT, Lee TG, Katon RM: Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Gastroenterology 70:314–320, 1976Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kessler RE, Falkenstein DB, Clemett AR, Zimmon DS: Indications, clinical value and complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Surg Gynecol Obstet 142:865–870, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seifert E: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Am J Gastroenterol 68:542–549, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ihre T, Hellers G: Complications and endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography.Acta Chir Scand 143:167–171, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Standerskjöld-Nordenstam CG, Fräki OI: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a surgical unit.Ann Clin Res 10:30–37, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Zimmon DS, Falkenstein DB, Riccobono C, Aaron B: Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastroenterology 69:303–309, 1975Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ammann RW, Deyhle P, Butikofer E: Fatal necrotizing pancreatitis after peroral cholangiopancreatography.Gastroenterology 64:320–323, 1973Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Tseng A, Sales DJ, Simonowitz DA, Enker WE: Pancreas abscess: A fatal complication of endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Endoscopy 9:250–253, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goldberg HI, Bilbao MK, Stewart ET, Rohrmann CA, Moss AA: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).Am J Dig Dis 21:270–278, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Cotton PB: Progress report ERCP.Gut 18:316–341, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    James EC, Collin DB: Sepsis complications in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Am Surg 42:229–232, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Wind GG, Rubin P, Waye JD, Bauer JJ: Pancreatic pseudocyst: Is endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography contraindicated?M Sinai J Med (NY) 43:558–564, 1976Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Davis JL, Milligan FD, Cameron JL: Septic complications following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Surg Gynecol Obstet 140:365–367, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Lam SK, Tsui JKC, Chan PKW, Wong KP, Ong GB: How often does bacteraemia occur following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)?Endoscopy 9:231–234, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kaufman B, Gambescia R, Maldonado A, Raskin JB: Systemic absorption of contrast agent during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Gastrointest Endosc 22:175–176, 1976Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Weizel A, Gelhaus-Klamant U: Renal excretion of contrast medium after endoscopic retrograde investigations.Endoscopy 10:30–32, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Joseph WL, Golding AL, Mulder DG: Complications of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Am Surg 31:679–682, 1965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Flemma RJ, Shingleton WW: Clinical experience with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Am J Surg 111:13–19, 1966PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mujahed Z, Evans JA: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Radiol Clin North Am 4:535–545, 1966Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Göthlin J, Tranberg K: Complications of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTC).Am J Roentgenol 117:426–431, 1973Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lank EK: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Radiology 112:283–290, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Burcharth F, Christiansen L, Efsen F, Nielbo N, Stage P: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography in diagnostic evaluation of 160 jaundiced patients.Am J Surg 133:559–561, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Cahow CE, Burrell M, Greco R: Hemobilia following percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Ann Surg 185:235–241, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Keighley MRB, Wilson G, Kelly JP: Fatal endotoxic shock of biliary tract origin complicating transhepatic cholangiography.Br Med J 3:147–148, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Koch RL, Gorder JL: Bile-blood fistula: A complication of percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Radiology 93:67–68, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Redman HC, Joseph RR: Hemobilia and pancreatitis as complications of a percutaneous transhepatic cholangiogram.Am J Dig Dis 20:691–698, 1975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Hines Jr C, Ferrante WA, Davis Jr WD, Tutton RA: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Am J Dig Dis 17:868–874, 1972PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Seldinger SI: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography.Acta Radiol (suppl) 253:1–134, 1966Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Nakayama T, Ikeda A, Okuda K: Percutaneous transhepatic drainage of the biliary tract.Gastroenterology 74:554–559, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ring EJ, Oleaga JA, Freiman DB, Husted JW, Lunderquist A: Therapeutic applications of catheter cholangiography.Radiology 128:333–338, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Fraser GM, Cruikshank JG, Sumerling MD, Buist TAS: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba needle.Clin Radiol 29:101–112, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ferrucci Jr JT, Wittenberg J: Refinements in Chiba needle transhepatic cholangiography.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 129:11–16, 1977Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Ariyama J, Shirakabe H, Ohashi K, Roberts GM: Experience with percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography using the Japanese needle.Gastrointest Radiol 2:359–365, 1978Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Goldstein LI, Kadell BM, Weiner M: Thin needle cholangiography.Ann Surg 186:602–606, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pereiras Jr R, Chiprut RO, Greenwald RA, Schiff ER: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the “skinny” needle.Ann Intern Med 86:562–568, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Jain S, Long RG, Scott J, Dick R, Sherlock S: Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography using the “Chiba” needle — 80 cases.Br J Radiol 50: 175–180, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Okuda K, Tanikawa K, Emura T, Kuratomi S, Jinnouchi S, Urabe K, Sumikoshi T, Kanda Y, Fukuyama Y, Musha H, Mori H, Shimokawa Y, Yakushiji F, Matsuura Y: Nonsurgical, percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography — Diagnostic significance in medical problems of the liver.Am J Dig Dis 19:21–35, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Juler GL, Conroy RM, Fuelleman RW: Bile leakage following percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography with the Chiba needle.Arch Surg 112:954–958, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Moskowitz H, Polivy C, Hackford AW, Mann N, Josel M: Complications of “Chiba” needle transhepatic cholangiography.Br J Radiol 51:541–543, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Okuda K, Musha H, Nakajima Y, Takayasu K, Suzuki Y, Morita M, Yamasaki T: Frequency of intrahepatic arteriovenous fistula as a sequela to percutaneous needle puncture of the liver.Gastroenterology 74:1204–1207, 1978Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Burhenne HJ: Direct cholangiography. In Miller RE Skucas J (eds):Radiographic Contrast Agents pp 251–259. University Park Press, Baltimore, 1977Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Weigen JF, Thomas SF: Complications of Diagnostic Radiology, p 325. Charles C Thomas, Springfield, Ill, 1973Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Schulenburg CAR: Operative cholangiography: 1000 cases.Surgery 65:723–739, 1969PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Way LW: Retained common duct stones.Surg Clin North Am 53:1139–1147, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Ho CS: Nonoperative removal of retained common-bile-duct stones.Can J Surg 21:244–247, 1978PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Mondet A: Técnica de la extracción incuenta de los cálculos en la lithiasis residual del colédoco.Bol Soc Cir B Air 46:278–290, 1962PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Mazzariello R: Removal of residual biliary tract calculi without reoperation.Surgery 67:566–573, 1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Fotopoulos JP, Caprini JA: Percutaneous forceps extraction of retained biliary tract calculi.Gastrointest Radiol 1:319–324, 1977Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mazzariello RM: Residual biliary tract stones: Nonoperative treatment of 570 patients.Surg Annu 8:113–144, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Burhenne HJ: Nonoperative retained biliary tract stone extraction.Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 117:388–399, 1973PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Burhenne HJ, Richards V, Mathewson Jr C, Westdahl PR: Nonoperative extraction of retained biliary tract stones requiring multiple sessions.Am J Surg 128:288–291, 1974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Burhenne HJ: Complications of nonoperative extraction of retained common duct stones.Am J Surg 131:260–262, 1976PubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Garrow DG: The removal of retained biliary tract stones: report of 105 cases.Br J Radiol 50:777–782, 1977PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • David J. Ott
    • 1
  • David W. Gelfand
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBowman Gray School of MedicineWinston-SalemUSA

Personalised recommendations