Advertisement

Foundations of Physics

, Volume 21, Issue 12, pp 1451–1477 | Cite as

Quantum propensities and the brain-mind connection

  • Henry P. Stapp
Part I. Invited Papers Dedicated To Sir Karl Popper

Abstract

It is argued that an adequate scientific treatment of biological systems requires the use of an ontological interpretation of quantum mechanics, and that the propensity interpretation proposed by Popper and others, when applied to the brain, leads to a natural representation of conscious process within the quantum-mechanical description of brain process. Thus quantum mechanics, unlike classical mechanics, has a natural place for consciousness and, moreover, in a sense to be discussed, even requires it.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Biological System Classical Mechanic Natural Representation Brain Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Karl Popper, “Quantum mechanics without ‘the observer’,” inQuantum Theory and Reality, M. Bunge, ed. (Springer, Heidelberg, 1967).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Karl Popper and J. C. Eccless,The Self and Its Brain (Springer, Berlin, 1981).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henry P. Stapp, “The Copenhagen interpretation,”Am. J. Phys. 40, 1098 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Murray Gell-Mann and James Hartle, “Quantum mechanics in the light of quantum cosmology,” inProceedings, 3rd International Symposium on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology, S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama, and S. Nomura, eds. (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1990); James B. Hartle, “The quantum mechanics of cosmology,” inQuantum Cosmology and Baby Universes (Jerusalem, 1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hugh Everett, III, “Relative-state formulation of quantum mechanics,”Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 454 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    David Bohm, “A suggested interpretation of quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden variables’,”Phys. Rev. 85, 166 (1952). See also, “The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory” (with Basil Hiley), to be published.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Werner Heisenberg,Physics and Philosophy (Harper & Row, New York, 1958), Chap. 3.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Niels Bohr,Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge (Wiley, New York, 1958), p. 20.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    David Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, New York, 1951), Secs. 6.9, 6.13, 8.14, 8.15, 23.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    John von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955), pp. 351, 481.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eugene Wigner, “Remarks on the mind-body question,” inSymmetries and Reflections (Indiana University Press, 1967); also inThe Scientist Speculates, I. J. Good, ed. (Heinemann, New York, 1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eugene Wigner, “Review of the quantum mechanical measurement problem,” inQuantum Optics, Experimental Gravity, and Measurement Theory, P. Meystre and M. O. Scully, eds. (NATO ASI Series, Physics, Serie B, Vol. 94, p. 58). See also, Eugene Wigner inNew Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory, D. Greenberger, ed.;Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 48, 5 (1986).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bernard Katz,Nerve, Muscle, and Synapse (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966), pp. 81, 48, and 88.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. Heitler,The Quantum Theory of Radiation, 2nd edn. (Oxford University Press, 1944), p. 26. See also James B. Hartle,The Quantum Mechanics of Cosmology in Quantum Cosmology and Body Universes, S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran, and S. Weinberg, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Henri Korn and Donald Faber, “Regulation and significance of probabilistic release mechanisms at central synapses,” inSynaptic Function, G. M. Edelman, W. E. Gall, and W. M. Gowan, eds. (Wiley, New York, 1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aaron Fogelson and Robert Zucker, “Presynaptic calcium diffusion from various arrays of single channels: Implications for transmitter release and synaptic facilitation,”Biophys. J 48, 1003–1017, 1985.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    William James,The Principles of Psychology, Vol. I (reprint of 1890 text) (Dover, New York, 1950), pp. 276 and 241.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ibid., p. 178.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    John von Neumann,Mathemetical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, 1955), Chap. VI.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henry P. Stapp, “A quantum theory of the mind-brain interface,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory Report LBL 28574 Expanded, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Henry P. Stapp, “Quantum measurement and the mind-brain connection,” inSymposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1971).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ref. 17, p. 146.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    William James,Psychology: Briefer Course (Henry Holt, New York, 1893), p. 468.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Daniel Dennett, “Toward a cognitive theory of consciousness,” inBrainstorms: Philosophical Essays on Mind and Psychology (Bradford Books, Montgomery, Vermont, 1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henry P. Stapp
    • 1
  1. 1.Theoretical Physics Group, Physics DivisionLawrence Berkeley LaboratoryBerkeley

Personalised recommendations