It is argued that language plays an active role in the development of scientific thought. A research project is outlined which will investigate this hypothesis and, in addition, focus on such questions as the role of mathematics in science and the status of the genetic code.
“Nothing is more usual than for philosophers to encroach on the province of grammarians, and to engage in disputes of words, while they imagine they are handling controversies of the deepest importance and concern.”—David Hume.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
N. Bohr, in A. PetersonQuantum Physics and the Philosophical Tradition. (M.I.I. Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1968.)
D. Bohm and F. David Peat,Science, Order and Creativity (Bantam Books, New York, 1987).
D. Bohm,Wholeness and the Implicate Order (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, Boston, 1980.
D. Bohm, “Quantum theory as an indication of a new order in physics,” inFoundations of Quantum Mechanics, B d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, New York and London, 1971).
G. Fauconnier,Metal Spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language (Bradford/M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1985).
Alan Ford, “Category theory and family resemblances” inQuantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm. B. J. Hiley and F. David Peat, eds. (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1987).
C. K. Ogden and I. A. Richards,The Meaning of Meaning, 10th edn. (Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1966).
See, for example, L. Wittgenstein,Philosophical Investigations (Blackwell, Oxford, 1968).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ford, A., Peat, F.D. The role of language in science. Found Phys 18, 1233–1242 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01889434
- Active Role
- Genetic Code
- Scientific Thought
- Deep Importance