Gastrointestinal Radiology

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 97–101 | Cite as

Computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of gastric carcinoma

  • Uriel Kleinhaus
  • Daniela Militianu
Article

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen was done in 49 patients with gastric carcinoma. These cases were retrospectively staged and evaluated as to operability. Various staging parameters were also evaluated separately. The results were correlated to findings on surgery, liver scan, and cytology. Overall accuracy of CT staging and operability assessment was 72 and 82%, respectively. Among the various CT parameters, perigastric fat invasion had a positive predictive value of 91%. The demonstration of local node involvement and invasion of adjacent organs was unreliable. Since surgery is currently the only treatment for gastric carcinoma, CT staging has limited clinical value. The principal role of CT is in the assessment of operability in patients with carcinoma of the stomach.

Key words

Stomach, carcinoma Computed tomography, gastric cancer staging 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dehn TCB, Reznek RH, Nockler IB, White FE: The preoperative assessment of advanced gastric cancer by computed tomography.Br J Surg 71:413–417, 1984PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moss AA, Schnyder P, Marks W, Margulis AR: Gastric adenocarcinoma: a comparison of the accuracy and economics of staging by computed tomography and surgery.Gastroenterology 80:45–50, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cook AO, Levine BA, Sirinek KR, Gaskill HV: Evaluation of gastric adenocarcinoma.Arch Surg 121:603–606, 1986PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fraser I, Nash R, James DC: Computed tomography in gastric cancer.Br J Surg 72:249, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Komaki S, Toyoshima S: CT's capability in detecting advanced gastric cancer.Gastrointest Radiol 8:307–313, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McFee AS, Aust JB: Gastric carcinoma and the CAT scan.Gastroenterology 80:196–198, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Moss AA, Margulis AR, Schnyder P, Thoeni RF: A uniform CT based staging system for malignant neoplasms of the alimentary tube.AJR 136:1251–1252, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Papachristou DN, Shiu MH: Management by en bloc multiple organ resection of carcinoma of the stomach invading adjacent organs.Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:483–487, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    ReMine WH: Indications and contraindications for surgery in gastric carcinoma.World J Surg 3:709–714, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wilson RE: Surgical considerations in gastric cancer.Semin Oncol 12 (Suppl 4):63–68, 1985PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Phillips WC, Scott JA, Blasczcynski G: Statistics for diagnostic procedures. 1. How sensitive is “sensitivity”; how specific is “specificity”?AJR 140:1265–1270, 1983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee KR, Levine E, Moffat RE, Bigongiari LR, Hermreck AS: Computed tomographic staging of malignant gastric neoplasms.Radiology 133:151–155, 1979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Balfe DM, Koehler RE, Karstaedt N, Stanley RJ, Sagel SS: Computed tomography of gastric neoplasms.Radiology 140:431–436, 1981PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith TJ, Kemeny MM, Sugarbaker PH, Jones AE, Vermess M, Shawker TH, Edwards BK: A prospective study of hepatic imaging in the detection of metastatic disease.Ann Surg 195:486–491, 1982PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc. 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uriel Kleinhaus
    • 1
  • Daniela Militianu
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Rambam Medical Center, Faculty of MedicineTechnion-Israel Institute of TechnologyHaifaIsrael

Personalised recommendations