Skip to main content
Log in

Nonvisualized gallbladder on oral cholecystography: Implications for lithotripsy

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Currently, most protocols evaluating the efficacy of gallstone lithotripsy require a visualized gallbladder on oral cholecystography (OCG). The primary purpose of the OCG is to establish that the cystic duct is patent. When the gallbladder is visualized on OCG, it can also be used to number and size gallstones accurately. Patients with nonvisualization of the gallbladder on OCG are excluded from consideration for lithotripsy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the ultrasonographic findings (i.e., number and sizes of stones in 32 patients with nonvisualization on the OCG). In 11 patients (34%) ultrasound (US) did not detect any stone, and it is presumed that the gallbladder failed to visualize for other reasons. Six patients (19%) had one or two stones and 15 (47%) patients had more than three stones. This suggests that 20% of patients with nonvisualization of the gallbladder on OCG would otherwise be eligible for lithotripsy provided that patency of the cystic duct can be demonstrated by other means, such as computed tomographic (CT) examination with oral biliary contrast or cholescintigraphy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mujahed Z, Evans JA, Whalen JP: The nonopacified gallbladder on oral cholecystography.Radiology 112:1–3, 1974

    Google Scholar 

  2. Berk RN: Radiology of the gallbladder. In Margulis AR Burhenne HJ (eds):Alimentary Tract Radiology 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: CV Mosby, 1983, pp 1434–1460

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stephenson GM, Freiherr G: Lithotripsy stirs passions as it moves to gallbladder.Diagn Imaging 10:98–103, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferrucci J: Gallstone lithotripsy: a preview.Radiology 168:333–338, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baker HL, Hodgson JR: Further studies on the accuracy of oral cholecystography.Radiology 74:239–245, 1960

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crade M, Taylor KJW, Rosenfield AT, Graaff CS, Minihan P: Surgical and pathologic correlation of cholecystosonography and cholecystography.AJR 131:227–229, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  7. Krook PM, Allen FH, Bush WH, Malmer G, McLean MD: Comparison of real-time cholecystosonography and oral cholecystography.Radiology 135:145–148, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  8. Toombs BD, Sandler CM, Conoley PM: Computed tomography of the nonvisualizing gallbladder.J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:164–168, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  9. Weissmann HS, Frank M, Rosenblatt R, Goldman M, Freeman LM: Cholescintigraphy, ultrasonography and computerized tomography in the evaluation of the biliary tract disorders.Semin Nucl Med 9:22–35, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berk RN (moderator): The radiological diagnosis of gallbladder disease — an imaging symposium.Radiology 141:49–56, 1981

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wong, K., Ekberg, O., Laufer, I. et al. Nonvisualized gallbladder on oral cholecystography: Implications for lithotripsy. Gastrointest Radiol 15, 126–128 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888754

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888754

Key words

Navigation