Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology

II. Barium enema examination

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A study of causes of error on barium enema examinations is reported. There were 144 patients with 189 inflammatory and neoplastic lesions of the large bowel examined endoscopically and with a preceding barium enema. Twelve lesions were not reported radiologically, a false negative error rate of 6.3%. Radiographic errors included 11 polyps and 1 sigmoid carcinoma. Causes for these errors were analyzed and classified into perceptive, technical, or combined categories. Ten lesions were visible in retrospect. Five lesions, clearly visible but not noted, were due to perceptive error. Five other lesions, poorly visible due to faulty studies, represented combined error. Two lesions could not be identified and represented purely technical failure. All unreported lesions were distal to the splenic flexure with the majority located in the sigmoid colon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Teague RH, Salmon PR, Read AE: Fibreoptic examination of the colon: a review of 255 cases.Gut 14:139–142, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sugarbaker PH, Vineyard GC, Lewicki AM, Pinkus GS, Warhol MJ, Moore FD: Colonoscopy in the management of diseases of the colon and rectum.Surg Gynecol Obstet 139:341–349, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Loose HWC, Williams CB: Barium enema versus colonoscopy.Proc R Soc Med 67:1033–1036, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams CB, Hunt RH, Loose H, Riddell RH, Sakai S, Swarbrick ET: Colonoscopy in the management of colon polyps.Br J Surg 61:673–682, 1974

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolff WI, Shinya H, Geffen A, Ozoktay S, DeBeer R: Comparison of colonoscopy and the contrast enema in five hundred patients with colorectal disease.Am J Surg 129:181–186, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kronborg O, Østergaard A: Evaluation of the barium-enema examination and colonoscopy in diagnosis of colonic cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 18:674–677, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Leinicke JL, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ, Stewart ET: A comparison of colonoscopy and roentgenography for detecting polypoid lesions of the colon.Gastrointest Radiol 2:125–128, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thoeni RF, Menuck L: Comparison of barium enema and colonoscopy in the detection of small colonic polyps.Radiology 124:631–635, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ott DJ, Gelfand DW: Colorectal tumors: pathology and detection.Am J Roentgenol 131:691–695, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  10. Yerushalmy J, Harkness JT, Cope JH, Kennedy BR: The role of dual reading in mass radiography.Am Rev Tuberculosis 61:443–464, 1950

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lusted LB: Perception of the roentgen image: applications of signal detectability theory.Radiol Clin North Am 7:435–445, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Herman PG, Hessel SJ: Accuracy and its relationship to experience in the interpretation of chest radiographs.Invest Radiol 10:62–67, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray JE, Taylor KW, Hobbs BB: Detection accuracy in chest radiography.Am J Roentgenol 131:247–253, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hessel SJ, Herman PG, Swensson RG: Improving performance by multiple interpretations of chest radiographs: effectiveness and cost.Radiology 127:589–594, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Laufer I, Mullens JE, Hamilton J: Correlation of endoscopy and double-contrast radiography in the early stages of ulcerative and granulomatous colitis.Radiology 118:1–5, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Laufer I: The double-contrast enema: myths and misconceptions.Gastrointest Radiol 1:19–31, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelvin FM, Oddson TA, Rice RP, Garbutt JT, Bradenham BP: Double contrast barium enema in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.Am J Roentgenol 131:207–213, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  18. Laufer I, Smith NCW, Mullens JE: The radiological demonstration of colorectal polyps undetected by endoscopy.Gastroenterology 70:167–170, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Hogan WJ: Role of colonoscopy and roentgenology in the detection of polypoid colonic lesions.Am J Dig Dis 22:646–649, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller RE, Lehman G: Polypoid colonic lesions undetected by endoscopy.Radiology 129:295–297, 1978

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maruyama M:Radiologic Diagnosis of Polyps and Carcinoma of the Large Bowel pp. 56–57. Igaku-Shoin, Tokyo, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gelfand DW, Wu WC, Ott DJ: The extent of successful colonoscopy: its implication for the radiologist.Gastrointest Radiol 4:75–78, 1979

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA

    David J. Ott M.D., David W. Gelfand & Neil A. Ramquist

Authors
  1. David J. Ott M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David W. Gelfand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Neil A. Ramquist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ott, D.J., Gelfand, D.W. & Ramquist, N.A. Causes of error in gastrointestinal radiology. Gastrointest Radiol 5, 99–105 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888611

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01888611

Key words

Search

Navigation