Abstract
TheChicago Area Transportation/Land-Use Analysis System (CATLAS) is a large scale urban simulation model which synthesizes “location rent analysis” from urban economics with “travel demand analysis” from transportation planning. This paper describes the theoretical formulation, empirical estimation and policy application of CATLAS to the evaluation of CBD-oriented rapid transit projects in Chicago.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adkins, W. G. 1959.Effect of the Dallas central expressway on land values and land use. Austin, Texas: Texas Transportation Institute.
Alonso, W. 1964.Location and land use. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Anas, A. 1981. The estimation of multinomial logit models of joint location and travel mode choice from aggregated data.Journal of Regional Sci. 21, 2: 223-242.
Anas, A. 1982.Residential location markets and urban transportation. New York: Academic Press.
Arnott, R. J. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1981. Aggregate land rents and aggregate transport cost.The Economic Journal 91: 331–347.
Ashley, R. N. 1965. Interchange development along 180 miles of I-94.Highway Research Record 96, Highway Research Board.
Beckmann, M. J. 1969. On the distribution of rent and residential density.Journal of Economic Theory 1: 60–68.
Boyce, D. E. and Allen, B. 1972. Impact of rapid transit on suburban residential property values and land development. Philadelphia, PA: Department of Regional Science, University of Pennsylvania.
Chicago Transit Authority. 1980. Estimates of heavy rail operating costs: southwest transit study. Chicago, Illinois: General Operations Division, Operations Planning Department.
Davis, J. L. 1965.The elevated system and the growth of northern Chicago. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University, Studies in Geography, No. 10.
deLeeuw, F. and Struyk, R. M. 1975. The web of urban housing: analyzing policy with a simulation model. Washington, D.C.: The Urban Institute.
Dewees, D. N. 1976. The effect of a subway on residential property values in Toronto.Journal of Urban Economics 3, 4: 357–369.
Domencich, T. and McFadden, D. 1975.Urban travel demand: a behavioral analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
Duann, L. S. 1982. A dynamic simulation model for residential location, travel mode choice and residential land development. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil Engineering, Northwestern University.
Golden, J. S. 1968.Land values in Chicago: before and after expressway construction. Chicago, Illinois: The Chicago Area Transportation Study.
Ingram, G., Kain, J., and Ginn, J. R., et al. 1972.The National Bureau of Economic Research, Detroit prototype, urban simulation model. New York: Columbia University Press and the NBER.
Krueger, C., heramb, C., Kunze, B., and Gallery, M. 1980. Southwest transit study, phase I report: preliminary alternatives analysis. Chicago: City of Chicago, Department of Public Works, Bureau of Transportation Planning and Programming.
Lemly, J. H. 1959. Changes in land use and value along Atlanta's expressways.Highway and Economic Development. Highway Research Board Bulletin 277.
Lerman, S. R. 1977. Location, housing and automobile ownership and mode to work: a joint choice model.Transportation Research Record. 610: 71–84.
Lerman, S. R., Damm, D., Lerner-Lam, E., and Young, J. 1977.The effect of the Washington METRO on urban property values. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Center for Transporation Studies Report No. 77-18.
McFadden, D. 1973. Conditional logit analysis and qualitative choice behavior. InFrontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105–40. New York: Academic Press.
McFadden, D. 1978. Modelling the choice of residential location. InSpatial Interaction Theory and Planning Models, A. Karlqvist et al., eds., pp. 75–96. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing.
Mills, E. S. 1967. An aggregative model of resource allocation in a metropolitan area.American Economic Review, 57: 197–210.
Mohring, H., and Harwitz, M. 1962.Highway benefits: an analytical framework. Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
Mudge, R. 1972. The impact of transportation savings on suburban residential property values. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Muth, R. F. 1969.Cities and housing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Permut, H. and Zimring, M. 1975.Capital and operating costs for the expansion of the Chicago rapid transit system. Chicago, Illinois: Technical Report, Regional Transportation Authority.
Quigley, J. 1976. Housing demand in the short run: an analysis of polytomous choice. InExplorations in Economic Research, ed. S. D. Winter. Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 76–102.
Sajovec, J. and Tahir, N. 1976. Development of disaggregate behavioral mode choice models for feeder bus access to transit stations. M.S. Thesis, Northwestern University.
Shelton, J. P. 1968. The cost of renting versus owning a home.Land Economics 1: 59–72.
Spengler, E. H. 1930.Land values in New York in relation to transit facilities. New York: AMS Press.
Wheaton, W. C. 1974. A comparative static analysis of urban spatial structure.Journal of Economic Theory 9: 223–237.
Wootan, W. and Haning, R. 1960.Changes in land values, land use and business activity along a section of the interstate highway system in Austin, Texas. Austin, Texas: Texas Transporation Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anas, A., Duann, L.S. Dynamic forecasting of travel demand, residential location and land development. Papers of the Regional Science Association 56, 37–58 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887902
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887902