Abstract
Computed tomographic detection of significantly large (greater than 1.5 cm) transcoelomic secondary malignant serosal deposits is discussed. Attention is drawn to the importance of the falciform ligament, ligamentum teres, and splenic hilus as sites of secondary deposits. An anatomical explanation is presented for the detection of these findings on computed tomography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Meyers MA: Distribution of intra-abdominal seeding: dependency on dynamics of flow of ascitic fluid.AJR 119:198–206, 1973
Amendola MA, Walsh JW, Amendola BE, Tisnado J, Hall DJ, Joplerud DR: Computed tomography in the evaluation of carcinoma of the ovary.J Comput Assist Tomogr 5:179–186, 1981
Solomon A, Brenner HJ, Rubinstein Z, Chaitchik S, Morag B: Computerised tomography in ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol 15:48–55, 1983
Meyers MA:Dynamic Radiology of the Abdomen 2nd Ed. New York: Springer Verlag, 1982, p 55
Jeffrey RB: CT demonstration of peritoneal implants.AJR 135:323–326, 1980
Romanes GJ (ed):Cunningham's Textbook of Anatomy, 12th edition. United Kindom: Oxford Medical Publication, Oxford: New York: Toronto 1981, p 444
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solomon, A., Rubinstein, Z. Importance of the falciform ligament, ligamentum teres and splenic hilus in the spread of malignancy as demonstrated by computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 9, 53–56 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887801
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887801