Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound in the diagnosis of a palpable abdominal mass

A prospective study of 107 patients

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In 107 consecutive patients referred to the ultrasound laboratory for investigation of a palpable abdominal mass, the examination was performed without knowledge of clinical history, laboratory findings, or the results of other examinations.

In 101 of the patients the correct diagnosis was subsequently verified, and 29 different ultrasonic diagnoses were reached. In 98 (97%) of the patients the ultrasonic diagnoses were correct. Two uterine leiomyomas were erroneously diagnosed as ovarian in origin, and a massive adrenal carcinoma was misdiagnosed as a hepatic tumor.

It is suggested that ultrasonic scanning is the method of choice in evaluating patients with a palpable abdominal mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooperberg PL, Cohen MM: Grey-scale ultrasound in the diagnosis of abdominal mass lesions.Can J Surg 20: 361–365, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yamaguchi M, Takeuchi S, Ahiyama H, Sawaguchi S: Ultrasonic evaluation of abdominal masses in the pediatric patient.Tokohu J Exp Med 130:25–39, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holm HH, Als O, Gammelgaard J: Percutaneous aspiration and biopsy procedures under ultrasound visualization. In KJW Taylor (ed):Diagnostic Ultrasound in Gastrointestinal Disease. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1979, pp 137–149

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holm, H.H., Gammelgaard, J., Jensen, F. et al. Ultrasound in the diagnosis of a palpable abdominal mass. Gastrointest Radiol 7, 149–151 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887629

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887629

Key words

Navigation