Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The postoperative stomach: A comparative study of double-contrast barium examinations and endoscopy

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The results of double-contrast examinations of Billroth I and Billroth II anastomoses were compared to endoscopic results in 37 patients. Radiographic and endoscopic correlation was present in 32 of the 37 patients (86%). All 22 cases with enlarged perianastomotic folds on the double-contrast examination had endoscopic confirmation. The double-contrast examination provides excellent visualization of the Billroth I and Billroth II anastomosis and adjacent mucosal detail. We advocate its use as the routine examination of the postoperative stomach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shirakabe H et al:Atlas of X-ray Diagnosis of Early Gastric Cancer pp 1–34. JB Lippincott Co, Philadelphia, 1966

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gelfand DW: The double-contrast upper gastrointestinal examination in the Japanese style: an experience with 2,000 examinations.Am J Gastroenterol 63:216–220, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Laufer I: Assessment of the accuracy of double-contrast gastroduodenal radiology.Gastroenterology 71:874–878, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laufer I, Mullens JE, Hamilton J: The diagnostic accuracy of barium studies of the stomach and duodenum-correlation with endoscopy.Radiology 115:569–573, 1975

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Moule B, Cochrane KM, Sokhi GS, Russell RI, Blumgart LH: A comparative study of the diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and radiology.Gut 16:411, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gold RP, Seaman WB: The primary double-contrast examination of the postoperative stomach.Radiology 124:297–305, 1977

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ellis K: Gastrojejunal ulcer.Radiology 71:187–196, 1968

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fawcett AN, Johnston, D, Duthie HL: Revagotomy for recurrent ulcer after vagotomy and drainage for duodenal ulcer.Br J Surg 56:111–116, 1969

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gabrielsson N: Gastric ulceration revealed only by gastrophotography.Acta Radiol 12:59–68, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schulman A: Anastomotic gastrojejunal ulcer: accuracy of radiological diagnosis in surgically proven cases.Br J Radiol 33:422–433, 1971

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wychulis AR, Priestley, JT, Foulk WT: A study of 360 patients with gastrojejunal ulceration.Surg Gynecol Obstet 122:89–99, 1966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cotton PB, Rosenberg MT, Axon ATR, Davis M, Pierce JW, Price AB, Stevenson GW, Waldram R: Diagnostic yield of fibre-optic endoscopy in the operated stomach.Br J Surg 60:629–632, 1973

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirschowitz BI, Luketic GC: Endoscopy of the postgastrectomy stomach.Gastroenterology 58:1067, 1970 (abst)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ominsky, S.H., Moss, A.A. The postoperative stomach: A comparative study of double-contrast barium examinations and endoscopy. Gastrointest Radiol 4, 17–21 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887490

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887490

Key words

Navigation