Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Seven experts drew the rectal axes of 18 representative proctographic images on two occasions, with a 1-year interval, in order to assess intraobserver variation in the determination of the anorectal angle (ARA). Intraobserver variation (6%) and interobserver variation (17%) were smallest when the central rectal axis was used to determine the ARA. A strong relation was found between inter- and intraobserver variation (r=0.77). Intraobserver variation tended to be rather small for pictures made during straining, but a relation with the magnitude of the ARA was not found. Although none of the seven experts could reproduce the rectal axes with ≤10% variation in all 18 pictures, redrawing of the central rectal axis delivered ≤10% variation in 86% of determinations. It is concluded that intraobserver variation is influenced by the expertise of the investigator, the method of analysis, and the anorectal configuration to be analyzed. Radiologic assessment of the ARA may yield reliable data on the dynamics of the anorectum if performed by a single investigator on x-ray films that allow confident analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tagart REB. The anal canal and rectum: their varying relationship and its effect on anal incontinence.Dis Colon Rectum 1966; 9:449–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brodén B, Snellman B. Procidentia of the rectum studied with cineradiography. A contribution to the discussion of causative mechanism.Dis Colon Rectum 1968; 11:330–347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kerremans R. Radio-cinematographic examination of the rectum and the anal canal in cases of rectal constipation. A radio-cinematographic and physical explanation of dyschezia.Acta Gastroenterol Belg 1968; 31:561–570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mahieu P, Pringot J, Bodart P. Defecography: I. Description of a new procedure and results in normal patients.Gastrointest Radiol 1984; 9:247–251

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bartolo DCC, Read NW, Jarratt JA, Read MG, Donnelly TC, Johnson AG. Differences in anal sphincter function and clinical presentation in patients with pelvic floor descent.Gastroenterology 1983; 85:68–75

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE, Thomas BM. The balloon proctogram.Br J Surg 1983; 71:29–32

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lahr CJ, Rothenberger DA, Jensen LL, Goldberg SM. Balloon topography: a simple method of evaluating anal function.Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barkel DC, Pemberton JH, Pezim ME, Phillips SF, Kelly KA, Brown ML. Scintigraphic assessment of the anorectal angle in health and after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis.Ann Surg 1988; 208:42–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parks AG, Porter NH, Hardcastle JN. The syndrome of the descending perineum.Proc R Soc Med 1966; 59:477–482

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hardcastle JD, Parks AG. A study of anal incontinence and some principles of surgical treatment.Proc R Soc Med 1970; 63:116–118

    Google Scholar 

  11. Finlay IG, Bartolo DCC, Bartram CI, Ekberg O, Fork FT, Kodner I, Kuijpers JHC, Mahieu PHG, Shorvon PJ, Stevenson GW, Womack N. Symposium: proctography.Int J Colored Dis 1988; 3:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Penninckx F, Debruyne C, Lestar B, Kerremans R. Observer variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle.Int J Colored Dis 1990; 5:94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Skomorowska E, Hegedius V. Sex differences in anorectal angle and perineal descent.Gastrointest Radiol 1987; 12:353–355

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hero M, Arhan P, Devroede G, Jehannin B, Faverdin C, Babin C, Pellerin D. Measuring the anorectal angle.J Biomed Eng 1985; 7:321–325

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bartram CI, Turnbull GK, Lennard-Jones JE. Evacuation proctography: an investigation of rectal expulsion in 20 subjects without defecatory disturbance.Gastrointest Radiol 1988; 13:72–80

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Turnbull GK, Bartram CI, Lennard-Jones JE. Radiologic studies of rectal evacuation in adults with idiopathic constipation.Dis Colon Rectum 1988; 31:190–197

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shorvon PJ, McHugh S, Diamant NE, Somers S. Defecography in normal volunteers: results and implications.Gut 1989; 30:1737–1749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Clinic Gasthuisberg, Catholic University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    F. Penninckx, C. Debruyne, B. Lestar & R. Kerremans

Authors
  1. F. Penninckx
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Debruyne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Lestar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Kerremans
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Penninckx, F., Debruyne, C., Lestar, B. et al. Intraobserver variation in the radiological measurement of the anorectal angle. Gastrointest Radiol 16, 73–76 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887309

Key words

Search

Navigation