Skip to main content
Log in

Interaction of nutrients and four antifungal antibiotics in their effects on Pythium species in vitro and in soil

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Griseofulvin, streptomycin, aureomycin, and actidione, with and without nutrients, were tested againstPythium ultimum Trow (two strains),P. irregulare Buis., andP. rostratum Butler. Streptomycin was tolerated in the highest concentration, and actidione and aureomycin in the lowest.P. rostratum, a saprophytic species, was more resistant to the antibiotics than the pathogenic species, which were inhibited at low concentrations. The two strains ofP. ultimum behaved differently, the oogonial strain being more tolerant than the sporangial strain. Yeast extract was usually superior to sucrose or asparagine in counteracting the toxicity of antibiotics.

Germination of sporangia ofPythium irregulare was studiedin vitro and in a natural soil in the presence of antibiotic and antibiotic-nutrient solutions. Very meager germination of sporangia occurred in soil amended with antibiotics. Actidione severely restricted germination in soil. Nutrients nullified the toxicity to varying degrees. Usually higher germination of sporangia occurredin vitro than in soil. Sub-lethal concentrations of antibiotics induced morphological abnormalities in germ tubes. Aureomycin caused a dendroid type of branching; actidione caused distortion, vacuolation, and vesiculation; griseofulvin caused lysis and septation; and streptomycin caused distortion.

Germ tubes were lysed in a natural soil and in soils amended with antibiotics, but nutrients, in general, prevented early lysis at low concentrations of antibiotics. No resistant bodies were formed prior to the initiation of lysis of germ tubes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayton, R. C. S., The effect of griseofulvin on certain phytopathogenic fungi. Ann. Botany20, 297–305 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barton, R., Occurrence and establishment ofPythium in soils. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.41, 207–222 (1958).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brian, P. W., Studies on the biological activity of griseofulvin. Ann. Botany13, 59–77 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brian, P. W., The ecological significance of antibiotic production. Microbial Ecology. 7th Symp. Soc. Gen. Microbiol.1957, 168–188 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brian, P. W., Griseofulvin. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.43, 1–14 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Butler, F. S., Saprophytic behaviour of some cereal root rot fungi. II. Factors influencing saprophytic colonization of wheat straw. Ann. Appl. Biol.40, 298–304 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dekker, J., Antibiotics in the control of plant diseases. Ann. Rev. Microbiol.17, 243–262 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garret, S. D., Biology of root infecting fungi. Cambridge University Press (1956).

  9. Gattani, M. L., Studies on the control of damping-off of safflower with antibiotics. Plant Disease Reptr.41, 160–164 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendrix, J. W. and Lauder, D. I., Effect of polyene antibiotics on growth and sterol-induction of oospore formation byPythium periplocum. J. Gen. Microbiol.44, 115–120 (1966).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hine, R. B., Effect of streptomycin and pimaricin on growth and respiration ofPythium species. Phytopathology, (Abstr.)52, 736 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isaac, I. and Milton, J. M., Response ofVerticillium species to griseofulvin. J. Gen. Microbiol.46, 273–283 (1967).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jefferys, E. G., Brian, P. W., Hemming, H. G., and Lowe, D., Antibiotic production by the microfungi of acid heath soils. J. Gen. Microbiol.9, 314–341 (1953).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kais, A. G., Germination and growth ofScirrhia acicola in liquid culture inhibited by cycloheximide semicarbazone. Plant Disease Reptr.48, 553–556 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lloyd, A. B. and Lockwood, J. L., Lysis of fungal hyphae in soil and its possible relation to autolysis. Phytopathology56, 595–602 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lockwood, J. L., Soil fungistasis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathology 2, 341–362 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mitchell, R. and Hurwitz, E., Suppression ofPythium debaryanum by lytic rhizosphere bacteria. Phytopathology55, 156–158 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Napier, E. J., Turner, D. I., and Rhodes, A., Thein vitro action of griseofulvin against pathogenic fungi of plants. Ann. Botany20, 261–266 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Park, D., On the role of amendments in the biology of fungi in soil. Soc. Intern. Sci. Rapt. VIe Congr.1956, 3, 23–28 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pramer, D. and Starkey, R. L., Decomposition of streptomycin. Science113, 127 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Vaartaja, O., Selectivity of fungicidal materials in agar cultures. Phytopathology50, 870–873 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vaartaja, O. and Agnihotri, V. P., Germination ofPythium sporangia in nursery soils in Ontario. Bi-Monthly Research Notes22, 6–7 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vaartaja, O. and Agnihotri, V. P., Inhibition ofPythium andThanatephonus (Rhizoctomia) by leachates from a nursery soil. Phytopathol. Z. (In press): (1967).

  24. Vaartaja, O. and Bumbieris, M., Abundance ofPythium species in nursery soils in South Australia. Australian J. Biol. Sci.17, 436–445 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wright, J. W., Biological control of soil-bornePythium infection by seed inoculation Plant and Soil8, 132–140 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaartaja, O., Agnihotri, V.P. Interaction of nutrients and four antifungal antibiotics in their effects on Pythium species in vitro and in soil. Plant Soil 30, 49–61 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01885260

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01885260

Keywords

Navigation