Foundations of Physics

, Volume 20, Issue 11, pp 1389–1397 | Cite as

Nonlocality and Gleason's lemma. Part 2. Stochastic theories

  • Andrew Elby
Part II. Invited Papers Dedicated To John Stewart Bell

Abstract

I derive a Gleason-type contradiction from assumptions weaker than those needed to reach a Bell inequality. By establishing the inconsistency between local realism and QM's perfect EPR-type anticorrelations, the proof fills in a gap left open by Bell arguments.

Keywords

Bell Inequality Stochastic Theory Local Realism Bell Argument 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Brown and G. Svetlichny,Found. Phys. 20, 000 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    L. Ballentine and J. Jarrett,Am. J. Phys. 55, 698 (1987).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. Redhead,Incompleteness, Nonlocality, and Realism (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1987).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Jarrett,Noûs 18, 569 (1984).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Elby, “Should we explain the EPR correlations causally,” forthcoming inPhilos. Sci. (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    R. Clifton, M. Redhead, and J. Butterfield, forthcoming inFound. Phys. 21, (1991).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Bohm and B. Hiley,Found. Phys. 11, 529 (1981).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Kochen and E. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Gleason,J. Math. Mech. 6, 885 (1957).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. Heywood and M. Redhead,Found. Phys. 13, 481 (1983).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Suppes and M. Zanotti, in Suppes, ed.,Logic and Probability in Quantum Mechanics (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), p. 445.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Elby
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics, 370 LeConte HallUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations