Skip to main content
Log in

Stream corridor management in the Pacific Northwest: II. Management strategies

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

King County, Washington is part of the rapidly growing Pacific Northwest region. Analysis of past and current federal, state, and county regulations and administation reveals how stream corridors have been protected to date. This article draws on scientific literature and a case study to suggest future management strategies and guidelines for controlling development in King County watersheds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bottom, D. L., P. J. Howell, and J. D. Rodger. 1983. Final report fish research project Oregon, salmonid habitat restoration. Department of Fish and Wildlife, Portland, OR. 155 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budd, W. W., P. L. Cohen, P. R. Saunders, and F. R. Steiner. 1987. Stream corridor management in the Pacific North-west: I. Determination of Stream-Corridor Widths.Environmental Management 11:

  • Washington Department of Natural Resources. 1983a. Final forest land management program environmental impact statement. Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. 681 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Department of Natural Resources. 1983b. 1984–1993 forest land management program, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. 195 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • King County Council. 1973. Native growth protection ordinance no. 1683. King County Council, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King County Council. 1979. King County ordinance 4365. King County Council, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • King County Council. 1981. Shorelines master program. King County Council, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Community Development Department. 1982. May Creek basin plan. King County, Council, Seattle, WA. 97 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Community Development Department. 1983a. 1983 annual growth report. King County Council, Seattle, WA. 191 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Community Development Department. 1983b. Newcastle community plan. King County Council, Seattle, WA. 177 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Community Development Department. 1984. 1984 annual growth report. King County Council, Seattle, WA. 232 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planning and Community Development Department. 1985. King County comprehensive plan. King County Council, Seattle, WA. 164 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revised Code of Washington. Chapter 90.58.

  • US Forest Service. 1981. Alpine Lakes area land management plan and final environmental impact statement. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Region, Portland, OR. 220 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Forest Service. 1985. Watershed management. Title 2500. Forest Service Handbook. US Forest Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Forest Service. 1986. Mt. Baker-Snoqualmie National Forests land management plan and draft environmental impact statement. Agriculture, Forest Service, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washington Annotated Code 222–16030.

  • Washington Forest Practice Board. 1976. Washington forest practice rules and regulations. Department of Ecology, Olympia, WA.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cohen, P.L., Saunders, P.R., Budd, W.W. et al. Stream corridor management in the Pacific Northwest: II. Management strategies. Environmental Management 11, 599–605 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880158

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880158

Key words

Navigation