Skip to main content
Log in

Induction of different chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase isoenzymes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings in response to infection byPlasmopara halstedii

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Plant Pathology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase activities were assayed in roots, hypocotyls and cotyledons of downy mildewsusceptible and -resistant sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) cultivars. While the highestΒ-1,3-glucanase activity was in roots, that of chitinase activity was in hypocotyls. Inoculation of both sunflower cultivars withPlasmopara halstedii resulted in a marked increase of chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase activities. The increase was observed earlier in incompatible than in compatible reactions. Both enzymes occurred in root tissue as a complex mixture of isoenzymes. At least three different peaks with chitinase activity and three with glucanase activity could be resolved by gel filtration chromatography on Sephacryl S-100 and chromatofocusing on PBE 94 (pH 7-4). Following ammonium sulfate precipitation and ion-exchange on CM- and DEAE-Trisacryl, three glucanase and chitinase fractions, referred to as basic, neutral and acidic, were separated on the basis of their Chromatographic behaviour. A different pattern of distribution of chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase fractions was observed between inoculated and non-inoculated plants in both resistant (cv. RS-105) and susceptible (cv. Peredovik) cultivars. In healthy plantsΒ-1,3-glucanase was mainly found in the basic (cv. Peredovik) and neutral (cv. RS-105) fractions, whereas chitinase was in the basic fraction for both cultivars. The neutral and acidic fractions of chitinases were induced in the compatible and incompatible reactions. Inoculation of the plants induced the neutralΒ-1,3-glucanase fraction in resistant and susceptible cultivars and the acidic only in the susceptible one. Induction of the basic fraction of both activities was not observed in any case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Boller T (1993) Antimicrobial functions of the plant hydrolases chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase. In: Fritig B and Legrand M (eds) Mechanisms of Plant Defense Responses (pp. 391–400) Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabello F, Jorrin JV and Tena M (1994) Chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase activities in chickpea (Cicer arietinum). Induction of different isoenzymes in response to wounding and ethephon. Physiologia Plantarum 92: 654–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinge DB, Kragh KM, Mikkelsen JD, Nielsen KK, Rasmussen U and Vad K (1993) Plant chitinases. Plant Journal 3: 31–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AB and Sackston WE (1985) Early stages of infection of resistant and susceptible sunflower seedlings by three races ofPlasmopara halstedii. Canadian Journal of Botany 63: 1725–1729

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulya TJ, Sackston WE, Viranyi F, Masirevic S and Rashid KY (1991) New races of the sunflower downy mildew pathogen (Plasmopara halstedii) in Europe and North and South America. Journal of Phytopathology 132: 303–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Joosten MHAJ and de Wit PJGM (1988) Identification of several pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato leaves inoculated withCladosporium fulvum (Syn.Fulvia fulva) asΒ-1,3-glucanases and chitinases. Plant Physiology 89: 945–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung JL, Fritig B and Hahne G (1993) Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) pathogenesis-related proteins. Plant Physiology 101: 873–880

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Linthorst HJM (1991) Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants. Critical Review of Plant Science 10: 123–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Margis-Pinheiro M, Martin C, Didierjean L and Burkard G (1993) Differential expression of bean chitinase genes by virus infection, chemical treatment and UV irradiation. Plant Molecular Biology 22: 659–668

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JF and Gulya TJ (1991) Inheritance of resistance to race 4 of downy mildew derived from interspecific crosses in sunflower. Crop Science 31: 40–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Siefert F, Langebartels C, Boiler T and Grossmann K (1994) Are ethylene and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid involved in the induction of chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase activity in sunflower cell-suspension. Planta 192: 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Tena M and López-Valbuena R (1983) Increase in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity caused byPlasmopara halstedii in sunflower seedlings resistant and susceptible to downy mildew. Phytopathologische Zeitschrift 107: 47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Vögeli U, Meins F and Boiler T (1988) Co-ordinated regulation of chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase in bean leaves. Planta 174: 364–372

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cachinero, J.M., Cabello, F., Jorrin, J. et al. Induction of different chitinase andΒ-1,3-glucanase isoenzymes in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings in response to infection byPlasmopara halstedii . Eur J Plant Pathol 102, 401–405 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01878135

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01878135

Key words

Navigation