Skip to main content
Log in

Interevention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the Children's Advocacy Model

  • Articles
  • Published:
Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Interagency coordination is a strategy for reducing trauma experienced by children during investigations of alleged sexual abuse. This report examines characteristics and outcomes of clients participating in three programs using the Children's Advocacy Model of interagency coordination. Implications for intervention with victims of child sexual abuse are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreson, A.F. & McMaken, M.E. (1990). Implementing child advocacy: A rationale and a basic blueprint.Juvenile and Family Court Journal 41, 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besharov D. (1991). Child abuse and neglect reporting and investigation: Policy guidelines for decision making.Child and Youth Services, 15(2), 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman J. R. & Smith B. (1987). Responses of social service and criminal justice agencies to child sexual abuse complaints.Response to the Vitimization of Women and Children, 10(3), 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, K. (1990). Child sexual abuse: A coordinated integragency response.Canada's Mental Health. June/September, 7–9.

  • Hunter, R. Yuille, J. C. & Harvey, W. (1990). A coordinated approach to interviewing in child sexual abuse investigations.Canada's Mental Health, June/September, 14–18.

  • Jones, D. P. (1991). Professional and clinical challenges to protection of children.Child Abuse and Neglect. 15, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, E. & Kouloumpos-Lenares, K. (1987). Clinical and state children's services worker collaboration in treating sexual abuse.Child Welfare, 6, 517–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Network of Children Advocacy Centers. (1990).Best practices: A guidebook to establishing a children's advocacy center program. Washington, D.C.: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, R. A. (1978)Multidisciplinary teams in child abuse and neglect programs. Washington, D.C.: National Center on Child Abuse and Neglect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, P. D. (1992). Evaluating multidisciplinary responses to child abuse.NRCCSA News, 1, 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Utah State Department of Human Services (1992).Children's Justice Center Annual Report. Salt Lake City, UT.

  • Walton, E. (1994). The confrontation clause and the child victin of sexual abuse.Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 11(3), 195–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, S.J. (1994). Child protective services: Research for the future.Child Welfare, LXXIII(5), 431–447.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jenson, J.M., Jacobson, M., Unrau, Y. et al. Interevention for victims of child sexual abuse: An evaluation of the Children's Advocacy Model. Child Adolesc Soc Work J 13, 139–156 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01876643

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01876643

Keywords

Navigation